Started By
Message

Rules committee to review ineligible receiver downfield rule next week

Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:14 am
Posted by AHM21
Member since Feb 2008
24445 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:14 am
LINK

quote:

Reviewing rules regarding ineligible receivers downfield, focusing on the balance between offense and defense. Part of this effort will be to find ways to help officials call this rule more consistently. Currently, linemen are allowed to be 3 yards past the line of scrimmage.


Posted by aspiclark
Member since Jul 2014
3140 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:15 am to
REC.
Posted by r2d2
Member since Dec 2006
6842 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:18 am to
Not to take Bama's side but I hope they make some changes.
Posted by TiggerWoods
Auburn
Member since Nov 2010
3974 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:18 am to
Saban so butt hurt about this
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:19 am to
This post was edited on 2/4/16 at 11:20 am
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Additionally, the committee will consider allowing the instant-replay official to stop the game and enforce a targeting foul that was not detected by the on-field officials.


interesting
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30160 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Additionally, the committee will consider allowing the instant-replay official to stop the game and enforce a targeting foul that was not detected by the on-field officials.
quote:

interesting
More "player safety" issues? The games are long enough without introducing another stoppage of game to review this. IMO
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:25 am to
quote:

The games are long enough without introducing another stoppage of game to review this. IMO



I think its interesting that they are essentially allowing the replay booth to call a penalty after the fact.

Can of worms with that one
This post was edited on 2/4/16 at 11:25 am
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42604 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:25 am to
They just need to be more consistent and find some sort of happy medium. You gotta allow a few steps and allow for players to do their jobs battling in the trenches without having to look down and count their steps but you can't let them 10 yards down the field. But yeah, it's gotten to the point of comedy when the rules committee jumps on whatever complaint Saban happens to have. I honestly don't know of another coach they do that for and I'm sure plenty have legitimate gripes.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64361 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:27 am to
Rules committee of 2017 to review legality of counted each point scored against Alabama as 1/2 of a point. Ruling can be applied retroactively.
Posted by KTownRebel
Kennesaw, GA
Member since Oct 2014
2854 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:27 am to
Guys ...



Guys look


Look guys




Seriously look



He is still mad. Lmao
Posted by LarrytheGolfer
Glen Iris
Member since Mar 2014
2433 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:29 am to
Bama would have 5 championships in a row had it not been for this cheating tactic.
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:31 am to
They should expand the rule to 5 yards downfield. Who gives a shite that it messes up defensive keys? If you have a qb that can run and pass then a team should be allowed to use both without have to show their hand.
Posted by Roses of Crimson
Sweet home Ala-bam
Member since Nov 2014
1631 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:31 am to
Ole Miss and Aub looking at ground right now with hands on hips. Dammit was just uttered.
Posted by Gary Busey
Member since Dec 2014
33277 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:32 am to
Auburn gonna be fricked.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79879 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:32 am to
If they were concerned with player safety, they would blow a play dead the second a helmet comes off instead of penalizing a player for continuing to play.
Posted by Roses of Crimson
Sweet home Ala-bam
Member since Nov 2014
1631 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:41 am to
Seriously, this is one of the more easier rules to enforce. The problem comes with the line judge. It was explained one night one a radio show i listed to on ESPN. Usually the line judge is concerned with the QB crossing the line of scrimmage. If you time it just right the line judge will not pick up the illegal man due to focusing on the QB. The back judge and ref have either a depth perception issue or are studying holding either offensively or defensively and are reluctant to make the call.
It is however, as cut and dried as it gets in relation to the 3 yds. It's a rule that's been in since day one but is rarely called. I'm fine with letting them go 10 yds downfield but let's make the rule to say that.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30583 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:41 am to
quote:

I think its interesting that they are essentially allowing the replay booth to call a penalty after the fact.

Can of worms with that one
A very rare concurrence.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42160 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:42 am to
it's still hard to enforce, do you go to replay 10 times a game to try and catch it
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
7540 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 11:43 am to
but then L5U would use that to stop offensive gains. sort of like them "playing" hurt to stop no huddle offenses.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter