Started By
Message
Rivalry discussion: What's worse?
Posted on 2/19/15 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 2/19/15 at 12:31 pm
A > Not being permanently tied to and branded with another school (not having a traditional rival)
B > Trying to convince everyone that your rivalry is the best and most important (having a rival and being gay about it)
edited for clarification
B > Trying to convince everyone that your rivalry is the best and most important (having a rival and being gay about it)
edited for clarification
This post was edited on 2/19/15 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 2/19/15 at 12:35 pm to white beans
A. It reeks of desperation.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 12:38 pm to white beans
LSU is a pussy institution is the answer.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 12:40 pm to sorantable
quote:damn right
LSU is a pussy institution
Posted on 2/19/15 at 12:41 pm to Legendary0903
I love to see you guys posting again
TSIO FTW!!!!
TSIO FTW!!!!
Posted on 2/19/15 at 12:42 pm to white beans
LSU, so lonely and bitter.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 12:56 pm to white beans
But Lsu doesn't have any real rivals
Posted on 2/19/15 at 1:01 pm to white beans
having david duke as a rep in the last 25 years.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 1:01 pm to white beans
C. Trying to convince Alabama to hate LSU when LSU falls on the radar somewhere around Miss State or Ole Miss.
D. Not having anyone to play when rivalry week rolls around.
D. Not having anyone to play when rivalry week rolls around.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 1:05 pm to Roses of Crimson
quote:why is this such a bad thing?
Not having anyone to play when rivalry week rolls around.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 1:09 pm to white beans
Someday, someone is going to have to explain to me this board's fixation on the concept of rivalries.
It's a seemingly endless topic of discussion, and I don't get it.
Is it an SEC thing?
A regional/geography thing?
It's a seemingly endless topic of discussion, and I don't get it.
Is it an SEC thing?
A regional/geography thing?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News