Started By
Message
Rationale Bama fans: how many starters do you bring back?
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:05 am
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:05 am
On offense and defense.
ESPN, 247 and ourlads say less than 11
ESPN, 247 and ourlads say less than 11
This post was edited on 1/20/16 at 8:07 am
9
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:06 am to GermantownTiger
We replace QB, RB, C, RT on offense.
NG, DT, MLB, CB on defense.
NG, DT, MLB, CB on defense.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:09 am to GermantownTiger
Enough to beat L6U
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:10 am to GermantownTiger
No Bama fans should respond.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:13 am to roadGator
quote:
No Bama fans should respond.
I'm not sure what a rationale Bama fan would be.
Rational, maybe, but rationale?
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:19 am to GermantownTiger
Calvin Ridley
ArDarius Stewart
OJ Howard
Cam Robinson
Ross P.
Alphonse Taylor
Jon Allen
Rueben Foster
Eddie Jackson
Marlon Humphrey
But they have a ton of depth guys like
Tim Williams
Dashawn Hand
Rashan Evans
Minkah Fitzpatrick
Daron Payne
Played so much they won't have an issue with plugging and playing. Bama's biggest issue is that for the first time since 2011 their breaking in a QB that's not an upper-classman and they don't have a proven stud RB. I know Bo is the next great, but he's injury prone and it'll be interesting to see if he can handle a Derrick Henry workload (40+ carries in big games)
ArDarius Stewart
OJ Howard
Cam Robinson
Ross P.
Alphonse Taylor
Jon Allen
Rueben Foster
Eddie Jackson
Marlon Humphrey
But they have a ton of depth guys like
Tim Williams
Dashawn Hand
Rashan Evans
Minkah Fitzpatrick
Daron Payne
Played so much they won't have an issue with plugging and playing. Bama's biggest issue is that for the first time since 2011 their breaking in a QB that's not an upper-classman and they don't have a proven stud RB. I know Bo is the next great, but he's injury prone and it'll be interesting to see if he can handle a Derrick Henry workload (40+ carries in big games)
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:22 am to Solo Cam
Bo wont get 40+ carries in big games. There will be a much more diversified backfield this year. I'd imagine if Bateman or Barnett start you will see a decent amount of Qb runs too. I actually think our Offesnse gets better next year and our D takes a slight step back in the front 7 but gets better at the back end. Overall I think we will be a better team.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:22 am to Solo Cam
Obligatory "this is the year that Bama is down!" post
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:29 am to catfish 62
quote:
Obligatory "this is the year that Bama is down!" post
Or even "this is a down year for the whole SEC" (in an attempt to proclaim why the top teams in the conf are not really that good).
Conf goes on to dominate the bowl season....
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:44 am to Patton
quote:You lose a Senior QB, All American Center and a 2000 yd rusher/Heisman winner and you think the offense gets better?
I actually think our Offesnse gets better next year
This post was edited on 1/20/16 at 8:46 am
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:45 am to Solo Cam
Yea, I think that's what I just said.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:46 am to Patton
Based on....? QB runs?
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:46 am to Carolina_Girl
quote:
'm not sure what a rationale Bama fan would be.
Rational, maybe, but rationale?
What is the rationale behind this question?
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:48 am to Solo Cam
I think we upgrade talent at QB
I think we can mange a return to our norm for Rb production.
I think the right side of our Oline improves in pass pro.
The worse lose is Kelly and he will not be easy to replace.
I think we can mange a return to our norm for Rb production.
I think the right side of our Oline improves in pass pro.
The worse lose is Kelly and he will not be easy to replace.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:49 am to Solo Cam
We also return a probable Outland favorite at LT, a filthy receiving core, and a ton of experience on defense.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:51 am to Solo Cam
quote:
Solo Cam
quote:
You lose a Senior QB, All American Center and a 2000 yd rusher/Heisman winner and you think the offense gets better?
I think we do, too. Coker was serviceable; Barnett may be great. We probably will not be as run-dependent, which means no stacking the box for our opponents. Our defense won't lose much, if anything. So, sure, we have a good chance at being better.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:53 am to Patton
This, but with Barnett!
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:53 am to GermantownTiger
Wouldn't even irrational fans know this answer?
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:55 am to ErnestTBassmaster
quote:
ErnestTBassmaster
quote:
bamabenny
quote:Read more.
you think the offense gets better
quote:He may be, but this is starting to feel like Jeremy Johnson last year.
Coker was serviceable; Barnett may be great
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:56 am to ErnestTBassmaster
I think whoever we start at QB will be better at escaping the pass rush thus allowing for less 3rd and longs. We were really bad at those this past year.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News