Started By
Message
Ranking SEC Rosters in 2017
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:52 am
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:52 am
Athlon
1. Bama
2. LSU
3. UGA
4. Auburn
5. ATM
6. Florida
7. Tenn
8. Ole Miss
9. USC
10. Ark
11. Miss State
12. Kentucky
13. Mizzou
14. Vandy
Also why did we allow Mizzou in the SEC?
1. Bama
2. LSU
3. UGA
4. Auburn
5. ATM
6. Florida
7. Tenn
8. Ole Miss
9. USC
10. Ark
11. Miss State
12. Kentucky
13. Mizzou
14. Vandy
Also why did we allow Mizzou in the SEC?
15
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:54 am to GermantownTiger
aTm too high
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:54 am to GermantownTiger
Meeehhhh
They list teh '13 classes on there as well, which for us only has 2 players still on the team; a backup LB and a punter.
They list teh '13 classes on there as well, which for us only has 2 players still on the team; a backup LB and a punter.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:55 am to GermantownTiger
Big 6 all in top 7
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:56 am to WG_Dawg
Top 4 would still be the same without 2013
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:57 am to GermantownTiger
Misread the title as Ranking SEC Posters. I'd come for my trophy.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:00 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
They list teh '13 classes on there as well, which for us only has 2 players still on the team
If you take the '13 class out, the order basically remains the same. UT actually jumps Florida and A&M. UGA does tighten the gap slightly
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:02 am to WilliamTaylor21
I bet you're used to getting participation trophies
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:14 am to GermantownTiger
Dan Mullen really is one of the best talent evaluators/developers in the country.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:27 am to MNW
Using nothing but recruiting stars is about the dumbest way to rate rosters/talent imaginable.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:36 am to GermantownTiger
Jesus Bama recruiting is absurd. LSU with the 4.8 avg class is pretty nice too though
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:37 am to Dore5674
quote:
Using nothing but recruiting stars is about the dumbest way to rate rosters/talent imaginable.
Agree 100%
Posted on 2/8/17 at 12:02 pm to MNW
Coming from teams that can't recruit lol
Posted on 2/8/17 at 12:38 pm to Dore5674
quote:
Using nothing but recruiting stars is about the dumbest way to rate rosters/talent imaginable.
It's the lazy way to do it, but the list does paint a pretty good picture of the lay of the SEC land nowadays. That suggests it's not completely useless.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:01 pm to randomways
quote:Does it, though? How many times has UGA even won the East over the past five years? How often is A&M a top five team in the conference?
It's the lazy way to do it, but the list does paint a pretty good picture of the lay of the SEC land nowadays. That suggests it's not completely useless.
Vandy just beat Georgia last year, for Christ's sake.
It reaffirms that Bama is far and away the best team in the conference -- that's it.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:09 pm to GermantownTiger
It's amazing how A&M has so much talent every year and they only win like 8 games. I wish we could have as much
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:11 pm to GermantownTiger
quote:
why did we allow Mizzou
you didnt
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:13 pm to GermantownTiger
We have like 2 players left on the roster from the 13 class I believe. Not sure why it's even counted. Most of that class was gone by the end of 2015. LOL Sumlin
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:21 pm to GermantownTiger
Athlon is another one of those, jokes.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:31 pm to GermantownTiger
Without taking into account early NFL departures and attrition in general this list is meaningless other than Alabama on top.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News