Started By
Message
re: Ranking of SEC schools since realignment
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:07 pm to 5thTiger
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:07 pm to 5thTiger
When I think realignment I think 1992. That was when the divisions were formed and the conference realigned. Don't think the addition of adding two middling Big 12 programs for TV money only is anything more than just an enhancement.
0
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:07 pm to MSUbulldogs03
I think he pretty clearly laid out his criteria. Maybe LSU above Florida, but certainly not MSU
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:09 pm to cas4t
quote:
there should be a "since realignment board" that Mizzou and aTm posters are only allowed to post on. That way you can suck each other off in peace.
amen.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:10 pm to Robert Goulet
quote:
I was hoping for the "Ranking of SEC schools since the last full moon", but I guess this will do.
Or maybe "Ranking of SEC schools in Missouri's top 2 years in program history".
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:11 pm to 5thTiger
I came of age when the modern era started so that is my myopic starting point.
If you have recently "came of age" I have no problem with since realignment being your myopic starting point.
If you have recently "came of age" I have no problem with since realignment being your myopic starting point.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:20 pm to ATLdawg25
quote:
Or maybe "Ranking of SEC schools in Missouri's top 2 years in program history".
I really didnt follow the SEC close enough before Mizzou joined to give an accurate ranking for these two years.
We can only give opinions since we joined if we are being honest
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:22 pm to piggilicious
quote:Well thats rich, a hog fan crying about banal posting on tRant.
amen
Isnt that a hoot.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:22 pm to 5thTiger
Is this a response thread, because it feels like a response thread?
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:24 pm to JesusQuintana
2012- 11-2; 8-5
2013- 4-8; 7-6
2014- 7-5; 10-3
22-15 in the East--1-1 in bowls
25-14 in the West-- 2-1 in bowls
He's ranking UF ahead of us because they finished in the top 10. Is a top 11 finish really that less impressive?
2013- 4-8; 7-6
2014- 7-5; 10-3
22-15 in the East--1-1 in bowls
25-14 in the West-- 2-1 in bowls
He's ranking UF ahead of us because they finished in the top 10. Is a top 11 finish really that less impressive?
This post was edited on 5/5/15 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:27 pm to 5thTiger
Ranking of SEC schools since realignment (insufferable version)
[ranking rules listed below]
1. Alabama - 38
2. LSU - 26
3. A&M - 24
4. Georgia - 23
5. Auburn - 21
5. Miss St - 21
7. Mizzou - 20
7. Ole Miss - 20
9. South Carolina - 18
10. Florida - 16
11. Vanderbilt - 11
12. Arkansas - 7
13. Tennessee - 6
14. Kentucky - 2
rules:
1.games involving non sec teams are meaningless and award no points
2. victories over SECW teams count double
3. victories over Alabama count triple
4. Against better judgment, Alabama not awarded points for beating self.
[ranking rules listed below]
1. Alabama - 38
2. LSU - 26
3. A&M - 24
4. Georgia - 23
5. Auburn - 21
5. Miss St - 21
7. Mizzou - 20
7. Ole Miss - 20
9. South Carolina - 18
10. Florida - 16
11. Vanderbilt - 11
12. Arkansas - 7
13. Tennessee - 6
14. Kentucky - 2
rules:
1.games involving non sec teams are meaningless and award no points
2. victories over SECW teams count double
3. victories over Alabama count triple
4. Against better judgment, Alabama not awarded points for beating self.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:29 pm to BearBait09
quote:
Alabama not awarded points for beating self.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:34 pm to 5thTiger
I don't know what you're rambling about, but my post still applies.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:40 pm to BearBait09
quote:
4. Against better judgment, Alabama not awarded points for beating self.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 12:43 pm to Old Sarge
Posted on 5/5/15 at 1:01 pm to ATLdawg25
quote:
Or maybe "Ranking of SEC schools in Missouri's top 2 years in program history".
Nope, this is all 3 seasons since A&M and Mizzou joined...including our 5-7 year.
Is it really so bizarre to only include history of which all teams are associated?
quote:
LSU above UF
Trying to stay consistent but I could be persuaded. Which is better.... 1 Top 10 or 2 Top 25's.? Could flip flop, but it is easier to justify.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 1:51 pm to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
LSU and MSU both have had better seasons than UF since realignment.
I guess you put State behind them just because you're blinded by what UF did in the late '00's, but what was the reasoning behind LSU?
They went 12-1 and won a BCS bowl?
Posted on 5/5/15 at 2:01 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
They went 11-2 and lost a BCS bowl to Louisville.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 2:04 pm to MSUbulldogs03
So a better season would be 12-1 and a BCS win.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 2:14 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Are you talking LSU or UF? I agree LSU should 100% be ahead of UF, and I think MSU should be right above them.
Posted on 5/5/15 at 2:15 pm to MSUbulldogs03
Nah, I'm just giving you a hard time because you said they have had better seasons
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News