Started By
Message
Over/Under NCs by each SEC Coach
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:39 am
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:39 am
Predict the over/under or even for each coaches' number of NCs (just as a HC) when their career is over?
Saban: 6.5 (Currently 5)
Bert: .5 (Currently 0)
McElwain: 1.5 (Currently 0)
Smart: 1.5 (Currently 0)
Butch: .5 (Currently 0)
Muschamp: .5 (Currently 0)
Odom: .5 (Currently 0)
Gus: .5 (Currently 0)
Stoops: .5 (Currently 0)
Les: 1.5 (Currently 1)
Freeze: .5 (Currently 0)
Sumlin: .5 (Currently 0)
Mullins: .5 (Currently 0)
Mason: .5 (Currently 0)
Remember this is about their whole career and not just their current school.
Saban: 6.5 (Currently 5)
Bert: .5 (Currently 0)
McElwain: 1.5 (Currently 0)
Smart: 1.5 (Currently 0)
Butch: .5 (Currently 0)
Muschamp: .5 (Currently 0)
Odom: .5 (Currently 0)
Gus: .5 (Currently 0)
Stoops: .5 (Currently 0)
Les: 1.5 (Currently 1)
Freeze: .5 (Currently 0)
Sumlin: .5 (Currently 0)
Mullins: .5 (Currently 0)
Mason: .5 (Currently 0)
Remember this is about their whole career and not just their current school.
This post was edited on 4/26/16 at 8:59 am
8
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:41 am to rockiee
Under
Under
Under
WAY Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
WAY Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:41 am to rockiee
quote:
Smart: 2.5 (Currently 0)
why would you set the bar this high? How many NCAA head coaches are there out there that have 2 national titles to their credit...and you're setting that line for a guy who hasn't even coached a game in his career yet? Yeesh!
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:43 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
why would you set the bar this high? How many NCAA head coaches are there out there that have 2 national titles to their credit...and you're setting that line for a guy who hasn't even coached a game in his career yet? Yeesh!
This post is very ironic but I believe he does have the highest potential at this point out of the new coaches. It might need to be 1.5 but I stuck with 2.5 if enough people think its too high, I don't have a problem moving it.
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:44 am to Tennessee Jed
quote:
Under
Under
Under
WAY Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
Under
SEC going to be bad for awhile, huh?
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:45 am to rockiee
quote:
I believe he does have the highest potential at this point out of the new coaches
he has potential out the yin yang but that doesn't change the fact that an O/U of 2.5 national titles for a guy who has yet to coach his first game is insanely unreasonable. I think 0.5 would be a fine bar to start with. And some of those coaches should be set at 0 because they don't have a chance.
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:45 am to rockiee
If we're including future jobs, I would say over on Freeze.
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:47 am to rockiee
quote:
Smart: 2.5 (Currently 0)
Wtf?
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:49 am to Tennessee Jed
Saban will have 7+.
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:50 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
And some of those coaches should be set at 0 because they don't have a chance.
Obviously this isn't some type of betting line. You could bet under on all and win a vast majority of them. Want to see who actually believes some of the coaches with 0 have a chance but wanted to included all at the same time.
This post was edited on 4/26/16 at 8:51 am
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:50 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
And some of those coaches should be set at 0 because they don't have a chance.
Bert, Stoops, Mullens, Freeze, Muschamp and Odom shouldn't even be listed.
This post was edited on 4/26/16 at 8:51 am
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:52 am to Tennessee Jed
quote:
If we're including future jobs, I would say over on Freeze.
Yes we are
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:53 am to rockiee
Of the ones currently at 0, the only ones that I can see potentially winning one someday:
mcelwain
smart
gus
I'm a bit torn on freeze, as I could maaaaaaaaybe see it if all the starts align.
But those 4 above are the only ones I'd say I could actually envision winning.
mcelwain
smart
gus
I'm a bit torn on freeze, as I could maaaaaaaaybe see it if all the starts align.
But those 4 above are the only ones I'd say I could actually envision winning.
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:54 am to CNB
quote:
Bert, Stoops, Mullens, Freeze, Muschamp and Odom shouldn't even be listed.
I mean its very likely that they won't win one in their entire career but I wanted to include all coaches, otherwise you get one guy who asked why you didn't include one.
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:55 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Of the ones currently at 0, the only ones that I can see potentially winning one someday:
mcelwain
smart
gus
I'm a bit torn on freeze, as I could maaaaaaaaybe see it if all the starts align.
But those 4 above are the only ones I'd say I could actually envision winning.
Do you think it will have to be at another school if Freeze is going to win one?
Posted on 4/26/16 at 9:01 am to Herman Frisco
quote:
Saban will have 7+.
Could see that, his number is very hard to set
Posted on 4/26/16 at 9:06 am to rockiee
quote:
Do you think it will have to be at another school if Freeze is going to win one?
yes.
Freeze probably has more talent to work with in oxford than any other stop he'll have, but he can't even win his division. That's not necessarily a knock on him and more so a testament to how ridiculously good not only the SEC is but also the sec west.
If he does win one I imagine it'll be a major football program just one in not as rugged of a schedule as the SEC.
gus, smart, and mcelwain and I can all potentially see winning one at their current schools. Adn teh only reason I include gus is because he's actually been there before and was a minute away from it. Looking at current trends he's obviously on teh way down. Mc is on the way up, and we just don't know about smart yet.
This post was edited on 4/26/16 at 9:07 am
Posted on 4/26/16 at 9:08 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Freeze probably has more talent to work with in oxford than any other stop he'll have
It is clear that Freeze loves Ole Miss so its going to take a nice offer to get him to make a move.
Posted on 4/26/16 at 9:11 am to rockiee
Freeze seems to get the team pumped enough to beat bama but they have letdown games that he shouldn't have. He has improved their record every year, which absolutely deserves commendation, but I just dont' think "national title winner" with freeze.
12: 6 losses
13: 5 losses
14: 4 losses
15: 4 TD loss to uf, home loss to arkansas, 2 TD loss to memphis
He has one season at OM with less than 4 losses, and all 3 of the losses could be considered "bad".
It's going to take more than simply beating alabama in the regular season for freeze to make a national statement, IMO.
12: 6 losses
13: 5 losses
14: 4 losses
15: 4 TD loss to uf, home loss to arkansas, 2 TD loss to memphis
He has one season at OM with less than 4 losses, and all 3 of the losses could be considered "bad".
It's going to take more than simply beating alabama in the regular season for freeze to make a national statement, IMO.
Posted on 4/26/16 at 9:17 am to WG_Dawg
Honestly, I don't know how you predict who will win a national title outside of Alabama (yea, I know, that sounds homerish, but it is what it is) and maybe Ohio State.
Any of those guys could make a run at 1 title. Who would have predicted Dabo Swinney and Clemson being in the National Title Game in 2015? Auburn and Gus in 2013?
Any of those guys could make a run at 1 title. Who would have predicted Dabo Swinney and Clemson being in the National Title Game in 2015? Auburn and Gus in 2013?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News