Started By
Message

Opening kickoff between Missouri/Vandy

Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:10 am
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:10 am
How was this not ruled a fumble, even after review?

If this had happened in a big game that mattered, the game might have been protested.

LINK

This post was edited on 10/29/15 at 11:17 am
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:11 am to
Do you have a link? I was too busy watching any other game
Posted by BigBlue8Titles
Kentucky
Member since Nov 2014
2450 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:11 am to
Missouri vs. Vandy?? I hope this game isn't the CBS 3:30 feature game
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95852 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:12 am to
I saw that fumble you are referencing. It's ridiculous it wasn't considered a fumble. The VANDY fan I asked about it said that they considered forward progress stopped.

Complete bullshite.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:13 am to
LINK

ETA: It's even more obvious if you saw it live.

The refs ruled that the Missouri player's forward progress had stopped. You have to be a legitimate retard to make that call
This post was edited on 10/29/15 at 11:15 am
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139673 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:13 am to
You'll have to provide the video. No one watched that game.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139673 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:14 am to
That was a fumble.

Who won that game? Anyone know?
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95852 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:15 am to
Vandy
Posted by Dore5674
Nashville
Member since May 2012
1105 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:15 am to
It's as bad of a call as you will ever witness. Vandy sent in a formal complaint easily could have cost the game.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:16 am to
Wow. How on earth could they have called that forward progress? They made that terrible call, and that screwed them into confirming it because of shitty review rules
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95852 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:17 am to
I love the fact that they reviewed the call (according to SBnation) even though forward progress is not reviewable, and STILL confirmed the call.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139673 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Vandy


Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:18 am to
It's kinda like, we fricked up, we gotta do something. The rules won't let us fix the frick up but let's try to see if we can anyways. Nope? frick.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:18 am to
One of the worst calls I've ever seen.

And you probably can't tell from the angle showed on SB Nation, but it was an absolutely crushing hit. Dude got rocked and the defender put his helmet right on the ball. It was a perfect form hit.

The ref who made that call shouldn't be able to work a game the rest of the year.
Posted by 5thTiger
Member since Nov 2014
7996 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:19 am to
Definitely a fumble. Honestly can't believe they didn't change it after the review.

Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139673 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:19 am to
SEC officials suck in good games for the Big 6 teams. I can't imagine the of suckage for the refs that get assigned to watch Vandy beat Mizzu.
This post was edited on 10/29/15 at 11:21 am
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:21 am to
quote:

It's as bad of a call as you will ever witness. Vandy sent in a formal complaint easily could have cost the game.

Mason was livid on the sidelines (as livid as he gets, at least).

Again, if that happened in a bigger game, it would be talked about nationally for days.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139673 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Honestly can't believe they didn't change it after the review.


Well since reviewing forward progress is not allowed, believe it.
Posted by 5thTiger
Member since Nov 2014
7996 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Well since reviewing forward progress is not allowed, believe it.


Yeah...but they did review it....which makes it even weirder.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95852 posts
Posted on 10/29/15 at 11:24 am to
It's funny that they still went through the process though

I bet it played out just as Genro described
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter