Started By
Message
Nick Fitzgerald or Shea Patterson? Who would you want as your QB
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:36 pm
I think you could throw in Brantley, Allen and Eason as best QBs in the SEC
Regarding these two, though, who would you want as your starting QB
Patterson 72-132 880 Yds 6TD 3 Int 1W 2L
Fitzgerald 196-361 2,413 Yds 21 TD 10 Int 6W 7L
Regarding these two, though, who would you want as your starting QB
Patterson 72-132 880 Yds 6TD 3 Int 1W 2L
Fitzgerald 196-361 2,413 Yds 21 TD 10 Int 6W 7L
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 12:37 pm
19
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:40 pm to Montgomery Hill
Probably the one who's already my QB
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:41 pm to Montgomery Hill
Which one stops you from starting more threads?
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:41 pm to RB10
RA him for alter. Let's get him gone
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:43 pm to Montgomery Hill
LOL, no mention of the 2016 SEC Offensive Player of the Year. Who happens to be a year older and wiser and stronger and faster and improved. Well, you might be living in an alternate universe.
Let's add Hurts' stats along with the stats you provided, and then compare. Hmm, hmmmm, hmmmmmmmmmmm.
Patterson 72-132 880 Yds 6TD 3 Int 1W 2L
Fitzgerald 196-361 2,413 Yds 21 TD 10 Int 6W 7L
Hurts....240-382, 2,780 Yds 23 TD 9 Int 14w 1L
And believe me, you don't even want me to add the running stats to the three QBs in this list, I'm being kind.
Let's add Hurts' stats along with the stats you provided, and then compare. Hmm, hmmmm, hmmmmmmmmmmm.
Patterson 72-132 880 Yds 6TD 3 Int 1W 2L
Fitzgerald 196-361 2,413 Yds 21 TD 10 Int 6W 7L
Hurts....240-382, 2,780 Yds 23 TD 9 Int 14w 1L
And believe me, you don't even want me to add the running stats to the three QBs in this list, I'm being kind.
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:46 pm to texag7
Not really
But good try. Like I said you think if you throw a bunch of shite at a wall some will stick
Didn't they teach you how to be a man in Fish camp
A man doesn't whine to get someone banned because they would rather not have to face the truth. Boy, it is time for you to stop being such a little bitch
But good try. Like I said you think if you throw a bunch of shite at a wall some will stick
Didn't they teach you how to be a man in Fish camp
A man doesn't whine to get someone banned because they would rather not have to face the truth. Boy, it is time for you to stop being such a little bitch
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:47 pm to Montgomery Hill
Personally, I want Fitz as our quarterback... but our receivers disagree. They want someone that is allowed to throw nerf footballs because it doesn't hurt their hands.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:49 pm to Montgomery Hill
quote:
Boy, it is time for you to stop being such a little bitch
Who would you pick as your QB Monty?
quote:
I want Fitz as our quarterback... but our receivers disagree
If only you played WR Yates, It'd be a match made in heaven.
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:51 pm to Montgomery Hill
Fitzgerald, really not a tough decision.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:52 pm to Saskwatch
I like Patterson's potential but at the moment it will have to be Fitzgerald.
May change by October.
May change by October.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:53 pm to Montgomery Hill
They are both hot garbage. So .... option C.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:53 pm to Tidemeister
Let's change places and put Hurts on State and Fitzgerald on Bama
Would the Tide have more losses then or would they have less
Would the Tide have more losses then or would they have less
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:54 pm to Tidemeister
quote:
And believe me, you don't even want me to add the running stats to the three QBs in this list, I'm being kind.
Why wouldn't they? That gives Fitzgerald better overall numbers in fewer games.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 1:05 pm to RB10
Fitzgerald did have excellent running stats, but my main point was to emphasize that how in the world could Hurts not even be in the top 5 returning QBS when passing combined with running and wins are factored.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 1:07 pm to Montgomery Hill
Hurts is really overrated and his release takes forever. He reminds me of a skinny Chris Relf. I do expect him to improve and finish his career strong, but bama also doesn't have the quarterback whisperer coach.
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 7/6/17 at 1:07 pm to Montgomery Hill
Patterson
Posted on 7/6/17 at 1:09 pm to Montgomery Hill
Austin Allen
Posted on 7/6/17 at 1:14 pm to Tidemeister
I believe if you replace Hurts with any of the other 5 QB's Bama would have won the National Championship last year
Call me wrong if you want but I believe that Saban limits his QB play because they are so strong in other areas while other QB's in the SEC have to attempt to substitute for lack of a defense or running game
Call me wrong if you want but I believe that Saban limits his QB play because they are so strong in other areas while other QB's in the SEC have to attempt to substitute for lack of a defense or running game
Posted on 7/6/17 at 1:17 pm to Tidemeister
quote:
Fitzgerald did have excellent running stats, but my main point was to emphasize that how in the world could Hurts not even be in the top 5 returning QBS when passing combined with running and wins are factored.
That's easy - you can put freaking Etling behind Bama's OL, and along with their running game, he'd probably put up better numbers than Hurts.
Posted on 7/6/17 at 1:23 pm to Montgomery Hill
Jalen Hurts 
This post was edited on 7/7/17 at 9:54 am
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News