Started By
Message

Mizzou decreasing football stadium capacity by 6,000 seats

Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:07 pm
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15511 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:07 pm
With today's approval of the south end zone renovation, Mizzou will officially decrease capacity from 71,004 to about 65,000.

I assume many of you will take the low hanging fruit and try to relate this to the SJW protest. I would expect nothing else from the Rant.

However, I am more interested in this from the aspect on two different fronts:

1. Live attendance has been declining and become a major issue for many schools. This is largely due to a better product on TV rather than the hassle of driving potentially hundreds of miles, paying for a ticket, paying for concessions/beer, paying for a hotel (1 or 2 nights), and cost of time. If that isn't bad enough, you get a better view, better replays, and production from the TV broadcast.

2. This probably hasn't had much real world impact YET on football, however the CTE crisis is a major threat to the sport. Either football will cease to exist, making spending millions on stadium expansions more risky in the long term....or football will evolve into an entirely different "less violent" game, which fans may be less interested in.

That being said, I'm interested to see how schools respond to these challenges and issues. Sure, schools like Alabama, Tennessee, LSU, etc are always going to draw big numbers. But for the non-elite programs, I think it may become a more common thing to see. If I recall correctly, Kentucky's most renovation was to improve the stadium while also reducing capacity. I think we may see schools start focusing a lot more on fan experience and stadium atmosphere when renovating and upgrading, rather than adding size and capacity.

TL;DR - Attempting actual discussion on tRant.
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:08 pm to
Should have figured out a way to keep the Rock M. Sad to see that tradition go away.

Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15511 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

Should have figured out a way to keep the Rock M. Sad to see that tradition go away.




Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69892 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

1. Live attendance has been declining and become a major issue for many schools.


Not for us. But we're awesome fans.
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15511 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

Not for us. But we're awesome fans.



Noted in the OP, thank you
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118889 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:11 pm to
It was posted already, but a smart move on their part.
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15511 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

It was posted already, but a smart move on their part.



While I'm not a huge fan of the design, I agree that it was smart on Mizzou's part. We weren't filling up the stadium as it was.

I saw somewhere that Mizzou only hit 70,000 nine times in the last 10 years (keep in mind Mizzou counts attendance by people who actually came through the gates and not just tickets sold). That being said, it was pretty clear we could afford a downgrade.

I think the new 65,000 capacity will create a better atmosphere, and should produce exponentially more sellouts.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42557 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:15 pm to
No, Kills.
Posted by Carolina_Girl
South Cackalacky
Member since Apr 2012
23973 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:20 pm to
1. Not at our place.

2. Not in our conference.
Posted by Carolina_Girl
South Cackalacky
Member since Apr 2012
23973 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Not for us. But we're awesome fans.


We're more awesome. So there.
Posted by DoreonthePlains
Auburn, AL
Member since Nov 2013
7436 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

Not for us. But we're awesome fans.



Ooooor just don't know how cable or satellite TV works. One or the other
Posted by Wrenchruh
Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2012
2413 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:23 pm to
Ever notice how bad the camera angle is at Missouri's stadium. It's too close to the field and you can't see shite when the ball is outside the twenties?

UT's and A&Ms stadiums give the best camera angle for TV imo.
Posted by Carolina_Girl
South Cackalacky
Member since Apr 2012
23973 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

Ever notice how bad the camera angle is at Missouri's stadium. It's too close to the field and you can't see shite when the ball is outside the twenties?



Probably planned to decrease the need for safe spaces.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:28 pm to
A&M's cameras are a mile back and up in the ionosphere
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38205 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:29 pm to
So it won't turn into this?



Or this?



Not even this?



That's a little disappointing
This post was edited on 8/25/17 at 7:31 pm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118889 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Not for us. But we're awesome fans.


I witnessed your awesome fans leaving in the first quarter of the Bama game last year. The guy in front of me said to his wife "I'm going to the RV".
Posted by David Ricky
Hailing From Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2015
24170 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

Ever notice how bad the camera angle is at Missouri's stadium. It's too close to the field and you can't see shite when the ball is outside the twenties?



All of this. Drives me fricking nuts anytime I watch them on tv. Vandy's angle sucks too, but for opposite reasons. Its like the camera is on top of the press box or something
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15511 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

So we're never gonna get this?





That's a massive stadium....like 105,000.

So unless Mizzou wins 5 national titles + the Cardinals/Chiefs/Royals leave.....the answer is no, we aren't :(


ETA: The very last one that you posted is still very much within the realm of possibility. But not for another 20-25 years probably.
This post was edited on 8/25/17 at 7:33 pm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118889 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:32 pm to
Shrinking is the smart move. UK did that as well. More and more people are going to give up the expense and hassle of attending games live and watching from home or a bar going forward.

I got tired of sitting around drunks who spilled their drinks all over the place and were just generally annoying.
Posted by SpookeyTiger
Williamsburg, MO
Member since Jan 2012
3529 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 7:41 pm to
The people of Missouri basically only care about the St. Louis Cardinals. Everything else is secondary so it makes sense that Mizzou would decrease their stadium.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter