Started By
Message
Lengthy A&M vs UT statistical comparison
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:15 pm
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:15 pm
Stolen from another board:
TEAM RANKINGS:
ESPN Power Index:
A&M: 7
Tenn: 12
Massey Rating:
A&M: 5
Tenn: 7
FPI Team Efficiency:
A&M: 10 (85.0)
Tenn: 31 (68.9)
SOS through 5 games:
A&M: 14
Tenn: 17
OFFENSE:
Efficiency:
A&M: 16 (76.9)
Tenn: 45 (60.5)
Scoring Offense:
A&M: 32 (39.2 pts/gm)
Tenn: 56 (33 pts/gm)
Total Offense:
A&M: 13 (521 yds/gm)
Tenn: 88 (381.6 yds/gm)
Rushing:
A&M: 12 (258.6 pds/gm)
Tenn: 63 (174.6 yds/gm)
Passing:
A&M: 43 (262.4 yds/gm)
Tenn: 87 (207 yds/gm)
First Downs:
A&M: 33 (24.2/gm)
Tenn: 93 (19.6/gm)
TOP:
A&M: 112 (26:28/gm)
Tenn: 97 (27:48/gm)
Penalties:
A&M: 59 (53.4 yds/gm
Tenn: 65 (54.8 yds/gm)
Turnover Margin:
A&M: 39 (+.4/gm)
Tenn: 47 (+.2/gm)
Fumbles (Lost):
A&M: 104: 10 2/gm (5 total lost: 50%)
Tenn: 53: 15 3/gm (3 lost: 20%)
Interceptions Thrown:
A&M: T-35 (3 total)
Tenn: T-99 (6 total)
Sacks Allowed:
A&M: 22 (1.25/gm)
Tenn: 65 (2/gm)
TFL Allowed:
A&M: 27 (4.4/gm)
Tenn: 65 (5.4/gm)
3rd down conversion %:
A&M: 64 (40.26%)
Tenn: 46 (44%)
4th down conversion %:
A&M: T-19 (71.43 %) 5 of 7
Tenn: T-110 (33.33%) 1 of 3
Red Zone Conversions:
A&M: 67 (82.61%) TD% (47.83%)
Tenn: 62 (85%) TD% (70%)
Long Plays from Scrimmage:
A&M: T-32:
20+ - 30
30+ - 20
40+ - 13
50+ - 5
60+ - 4
70+ - 2
80+ - 2
90+ - 1
Tenn: T-72:
20+ - 23
30+ - 10
40+ - 5
50+ - 2
60+ - 2
70+ - 0
80+ - 0
90+ - 0
DEFENSE:
Efficiency:
A&M: 19 (79.9)
Tenn: 33 (65.6)
Scoring:
A&M: 12 (15.4 pts/gm)
Tenn: 45 (23 pts/gm)
Total:
A&M: 64 (388.2 yds/gm)
Tenn: 43 (360.8 yds/gm)
Rushing:
A&M: 45 (134.8 yds/gm)
Tenn: 57 (149 yds/gm)
Passing:
A&M: 87 (253.4 yds/gm)
Tenn: 48 (211.8 yds/gm)
Sacks:
A&M: 16 (3.2/gm)
Tenn: 91 (1.6/gm)
TFL:
A&M: 1 (10/gm)
Tenn: 37 (6.6/gm)
Fumbles:
A&M: T-15 (45.45%) 11 forced- 5 recovered
Tenn: T-2 (70%) 10 forced- 7 recovered
Passed Defended (INT):
A&M: T-10: 25 PBU (5 INT): 6 passed defended/gm
Tenn: T-56 18 PBU (3 INT): 4.2 passed defended/gm
Opponent 3rd down %:
A&M: 35 (33.73)
Tenn: 42 (34.21%)
Opponent Red zone conversion %:
A&M: 3 (53.85% scoring): 20 attempts 6 TDS 5 FGs allowed
Tenn: 111 (93.75% scoring): 16 attempts- 10 TDs 5 FGs allowed
Opponent Long Plays from Scrimmage:
A&M: T-99:
10+ - 77
20+ - 21
30+ - 10
40+ - 4
50+ - 3
60+ - 2
70+ - 1
80+ - 0
90+ - 0
Tenn: T-53:
10+ - 62
20+ - 16
30+ - 10
40+ - 6
50+-3
60+ - 1
70+ - 0
80+ - 0
90+ - 0
SPECIAL TEAMS:
Efficiency:
A&M: 31 (63.0)
Tenn: 26 (64.4)
FG %:
A&M: 48 (78.6%) 11 of 14
Tenn: 81 (66.7%) 4 of 6
Punting:
A&M: 20 (44.3 avg)
Tenn: 49 (41.97 avg)
Kickoffs:
A&M: 3 (65.03 avg. yds) 76.32% touchback
Tennessee: 26 (63.93 avg. yds.) 55.17% touchback 78
TEAM RANKINGS:
ESPN Power Index:
A&M: 7
Tenn: 12
Massey Rating:
A&M: 5
Tenn: 7
FPI Team Efficiency:
A&M: 10 (85.0)
Tenn: 31 (68.9)
SOS through 5 games:
A&M: 14
Tenn: 17
OFFENSE:
Efficiency:
A&M: 16 (76.9)
Tenn: 45 (60.5)
Scoring Offense:
A&M: 32 (39.2 pts/gm)
Tenn: 56 (33 pts/gm)
Total Offense:
A&M: 13 (521 yds/gm)
Tenn: 88 (381.6 yds/gm)
Rushing:
A&M: 12 (258.6 pds/gm)
Tenn: 63 (174.6 yds/gm)
Passing:
A&M: 43 (262.4 yds/gm)
Tenn: 87 (207 yds/gm)
First Downs:
A&M: 33 (24.2/gm)
Tenn: 93 (19.6/gm)
TOP:
A&M: 112 (26:28/gm)
Tenn: 97 (27:48/gm)
Penalties:
A&M: 59 (53.4 yds/gm
Tenn: 65 (54.8 yds/gm)
Turnover Margin:
A&M: 39 (+.4/gm)
Tenn: 47 (+.2/gm)
Fumbles (Lost):
A&M: 104: 10 2/gm (5 total lost: 50%)
Tenn: 53: 15 3/gm (3 lost: 20%)
Interceptions Thrown:
A&M: T-35 (3 total)
Tenn: T-99 (6 total)
Sacks Allowed:
A&M: 22 (1.25/gm)
Tenn: 65 (2/gm)
TFL Allowed:
A&M: 27 (4.4/gm)
Tenn: 65 (5.4/gm)
3rd down conversion %:
A&M: 64 (40.26%)
Tenn: 46 (44%)
4th down conversion %:
A&M: T-19 (71.43 %) 5 of 7
Tenn: T-110 (33.33%) 1 of 3
Red Zone Conversions:
A&M: 67 (82.61%) TD% (47.83%)
Tenn: 62 (85%) TD% (70%)
Long Plays from Scrimmage:
A&M: T-32:
20+ - 30
30+ - 20
40+ - 13
50+ - 5
60+ - 4
70+ - 2
80+ - 2
90+ - 1
Tenn: T-72:
20+ - 23
30+ - 10
40+ - 5
50+ - 2
60+ - 2
70+ - 0
80+ - 0
90+ - 0
DEFENSE:
Efficiency:
A&M: 19 (79.9)
Tenn: 33 (65.6)
Scoring:
A&M: 12 (15.4 pts/gm)
Tenn: 45 (23 pts/gm)
Total:
A&M: 64 (388.2 yds/gm)
Tenn: 43 (360.8 yds/gm)
Rushing:
A&M: 45 (134.8 yds/gm)
Tenn: 57 (149 yds/gm)
Passing:
A&M: 87 (253.4 yds/gm)
Tenn: 48 (211.8 yds/gm)
Sacks:
A&M: 16 (3.2/gm)
Tenn: 91 (1.6/gm)
TFL:
A&M: 1 (10/gm)
Tenn: 37 (6.6/gm)
Fumbles:
A&M: T-15 (45.45%) 11 forced- 5 recovered
Tenn: T-2 (70%) 10 forced- 7 recovered
Passed Defended (INT):
A&M: T-10: 25 PBU (5 INT): 6 passed defended/gm
Tenn: T-56 18 PBU (3 INT): 4.2 passed defended/gm
Opponent 3rd down %:
A&M: 35 (33.73)
Tenn: 42 (34.21%)
Opponent Red zone conversion %:
A&M: 3 (53.85% scoring): 20 attempts 6 TDS 5 FGs allowed
Tenn: 111 (93.75% scoring): 16 attempts- 10 TDs 5 FGs allowed
Opponent Long Plays from Scrimmage:
A&M: T-99:
10+ - 77
20+ - 21
30+ - 10
40+ - 4
50+ - 3
60+ - 2
70+ - 1
80+ - 0
90+ - 0
Tenn: T-53:
10+ - 62
20+ - 16
30+ - 10
40+ - 6
50+-3
60+ - 1
70+ - 0
80+ - 0
90+ - 0
SPECIAL TEAMS:
Efficiency:
A&M: 31 (63.0)
Tenn: 26 (64.4)
FG %:
A&M: 48 (78.6%) 11 of 14
Tenn: 81 (66.7%) 4 of 6
Punting:
A&M: 20 (44.3 avg)
Tenn: 49 (41.97 avg)
Kickoffs:
A&M: 3 (65.03 avg. yds) 76.32% touchback
Tennessee: 26 (63.93 avg. yds.) 55.17% touchback 78
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:16 pm to Hugh McElroy
A&M has scored 7 points against the VOLS all time
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:17 pm to Hugh McElroy
So what you're saying is A&M is clearly the better team.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:19 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
stolen from TexAgs
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:26 pm to Manzielathon
quote:
So what you're saying is A&M is clearly the better team.
The stats reflect the fact that UT has struggled to win their games, while aTm has won theirs convincingly. So yes, the stats say aTm is the better team.
This post was edited on 10/3/16 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:30 pm to Hugh McElroy
Aggy stacked
Vololololols fuuuuucked
Vololololols fuuuuucked
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:36 pm to Manzielathon
Sure, the stats clearly say that A&M is better. But the games ain't played on paper, and UT is good. I expect a battle.
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:40 pm to Hugh McElroy
Aggy should have no problem with VOLS then imo
This post was edited on 10/3/16 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:41 pm to Hugh McElroy
Yeah, A&M has been better so far. Who is disputing that?
Posted on 10/3/16 at 7:13 pm to Hugh McElroy
Damn, looks like there's no need to play the game
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News