Started By
Message
re: Latest top selling universities from CLC
Posted on 6/29/15 at 8:47 am to Hugh McElroy
Posted on 6/29/15 at 8:47 am to Hugh McElroy
quote:
Lil' Bro ain't worried that Texas is ahead of them, too, or that Big Bro is ahead of them. They just glad that Texas is ahead of Big Bro.
So Big Bro is a puss that can't beat Lil Bro?
Sounds reasonable
0
Posted on 6/29/15 at 8:48 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Texas still >>>>> A+M
Congrats on the moral victory!
Posted on 6/29/15 at 8:53 am to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
Texas still >>>>> A+M
I thought aTm #wrts
Posted on 6/29/15 at 8:55 am to LSU_Saints_Hornets
Congrats on the moral victory!
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:15 am to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
Congrats on the moral victory!
Congrats at being a tamu aggie. Not everyone gets into UT. Those who don't usually wind up at ACC, Texas State or tamu. You got into the third best school of those four. That's something to hang your hat on.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:16 am to notsince98
quote:
Mizzou @19.
With as well as Mizzou has done, I'm shocked you're that low. The world of college sports and brand popularity is an unfair world.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:23 am to cypressbrake3
I'm always amazed at how Mich. is followed around the country. I currently work with 3 Mich fans right in the heart of Alabama.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:26 am to notsince98
quote:
Mizzou @19.
Honeymoon effect?
Not saying Tigers can't be a solid Top 25 to Top 50, just suggesting sales may be higher in the 1st 5 years until you reach a leveling off place. Places like Texas and Texas A&M that produce lots of living alumni each year should always have a population edge over the longer timeline.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:34 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
Honeymoon effect?
Not saying Tigers can't be a solid Top 25 to Top 50, just suggesting sales may be higher in the 1st 5 years until you reach a leveling off place. Places like Texas and Texas A&M that produce lots of living alumni each year should always have a population edge over the longer timeline.
No, we have been between 15 and 21 for about the last decade.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:38 am to cypressbrake3
My guess is we don't use CLC.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:39 am to notsince98
quote:
No, we have been between 15 and 21 for about the last decade.
Interesting.
What year did they have their highest spot? Pre SEC or post SEC?
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:46 am to notsince98
I wonder why the SEC move didn't have the same effect for Mizzou that it did for A&M. We had been stuck around #20 as well for pretty much forever. We moved to the SEC, shot up to #5 with Manziel and the top 5 finish, and have settled into #6 post-Manziel. If we could start winning 10 games every year, we could climb into the top 3 or 4.
This post was edited on 6/29/15 at 9:47 am
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:59 am to Hugh McElroy
quote:LINK
COLLEGIATE LICENSING COMPANY EXTENDS PARTNERSHIP WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
Monday, June 29, 2015
ATLANTA, GA (June 29, 2015) – The Collegiate Licensing Company (CLC), the licensing affiliate of IMG College, today announced a 10-year extension of its partnership with The University of Alabama.
Alabama, the company’s first client upon its founding in 1981, is currently CLC’s top-selling institution in units sold, royalty revenue, and sales. The University’s licensing program, which has generated more than $98 million since its inception, continues to build momentum – royalties have increased 83% in the last five years and 250% since 2005. Alabama’s licensing revenue has increased in 13 of the past 15 years. The program is currently experiencing the best distribution in its history, with official Crimson Tide merchandise sold in more than 7,000 retail locations.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 10:01 am to logjamming
quote:
Congrats at being a tamu aggie. Not everyone gets into UT. Those who don't usually wind up at ACC, Texas State or tamu. You got into the third best school of those four. That's something to hang your hat on.
You have way too much specific Aggie hate for being some random Ohio St. fan.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 10:04 am to cardboardboxer
I think it likely he's one of our resident longhorns.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 10:30 am to Hugh McElroy
I just remembered something...
When A&M moved to the SEC, we jumped from like 19 to 15. Arky at the time was 9. Some Hog posters used that as evidence that Arky was a bigger brand. That used to be true, I guess. Not anymore.
When A&M moved to the SEC, we jumped from like 19 to 15. Arky at the time was 9. Some Hog posters used that as evidence that Arky was a bigger brand. That used to be true, I guess. Not anymore.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 10:30 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
My guess is we don't use CLC.
As if Moo State had other options.
Face it pal, your school doesn't generate enough interest to make the list.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 10:32 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
Interesting.
What year did they have their highest spot? Pre SEC or post SEC?
Pre. I think it was 2008 or 2009.
Keep in mind the posted ranking is only for the 3rd quarter. It doesn't cover the entire fiscal year. I think fall quarters are when Mizzou does better.
Posted on 6/29/15 at 10:36 am to cypressbrake3
quote:Apparently we do. LINK
As if Moo State had other options.
Not familiar enough with it to know all the in's and out's, but I know we generate more interests than at least 2/3's of the teams on that list.
quote:Hilarious.
Moo State
35-29
This post was edited on 6/29/15 at 10:38 am
Posted on 6/29/15 at 10:52 am to Hugh McElroy
quote:
I think it likely he's one of our resident longhorns.
If I were a longhorn, would that automatically make me better than you because I was accepted to the State's flagship university?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News