Started By
Message
re: IYO: SEC Tiers
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:14 pm to HurdForHeisman1
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:14 pm to HurdForHeisman1
quote:
Tier 1:
Alabama
LSU
Florida
Tier 2:
Georgia
Tennessee
Auburn
Tier 3:
Texas A&M
Ole Miss
Arkansas
Tier 4:
Mississippi State
Missouri
South Carolina
Tier 5:
Kentucky
Vanderbilt
That looks about right. I might flip Ole Miss and South Carolina.
0
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:15 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Since college football warehouse is dedicated to college football history, I would take their opinion over yours. They say A&M is much, much closer to being Ole Miss. You are only 82 points ahead of them. You are almost double that amount of points (162) behind Auburn.
I would take their ratings over winsipedia since they include strength of schedule. Any ranking system would be bogus without it. Winsipedia also includes irrelevant factors like NFL draft picks and number of all Americans.
Just remember that the CFDW is one person's random site.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:17 pm to Nguyening
Kind of like you using conference championships to determine who is better because it is one of the few categories that favors you. Forget that the teams didn't play the same competition.
I believe Texas has more conference championships than Alabama. I guess this means Texas has a better program , huh?
However, we do that when all 3 programs have played in the same conference you have the same number of conference championships as Ole Miss and less than Auburn
I believe Texas has more conference championships than Alabama. I guess this means Texas has a better program , huh?
However, we do that when all 3 programs have played in the same conference you have the same number of conference championships as Ole Miss and less than Auburn
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:18 pm to Nguyening
quote:
You would take a subjective ranking website over unbiased hard numbers because they suit your argument?
I gave you wins, win %, and conf championships and you give CFBwarehouse points?
That's like Monopoly money bro
Y'all weren't in the same conference until 2012 though.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:25 pm to Korin
Not surprised you are dumb enough to respond to my post and ignore the original post ranking Florida on the same level as Bama and LSU. That is probably the biggest bs post in this entire thread. Florida is probably the 6th out of the big 6 historically and God knows they are nowhere close to being on the same level as Alabama
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:26 pm to auburnphan23
You do realize that we're ranked above Auburn in your precious CFDW rankings, right? 
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:28 pm to auburnphan23
quote:sorry, but this is Sig worthy coming from Phan
Florida is probably the 6th out of the big 6 historically and God knows they are nowhere close to being on the same level as Alabama
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:32 pm to TT9
quote:
TT9
Fun fact of the day :
Hitler was also a vegetarian.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:33 pm to TT9
He's been championing the CFDW rankings all thread long not realizing that we're ranked ahead of Auburn.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:36 pm to Vols&Shaft83
It's been pointed out many times here.
He also hated smoking, and my monkey smokes like a mofo!
So Adolf can die in a fire while drowning.
He also hated smoking, and my monkey smokes like a mofo!
So Adolf can die in a fire while drowning.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:55 pm to TT9
All time football only
Tier 1
Alabama
Tier 2
Tennesee LSU Florida
Tier 3
Georgia Auburn
Tier 4
Arkansas
Tier 5
aTm Missouri ole miss
Tier 6
USCe Miss St kentucky
Tier 7
Vanderbilt
Tier 1
Alabama
Tier 2
Tennesee LSU Florida
Tier 3
Georgia Auburn
Tier 4
Arkansas
Tier 5
aTm Missouri ole miss
Tier 6
USCe Miss St kentucky
Tier 7
Vanderbilt
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:56 pm to Korin
I would take their rankings over any other I have seen, but that doesn't mean they are perfect. I would include conference championships as long as you balance it out with strength of schedule to show the difference in difficulty between the conferences.
If you truly count all time going back to when teams first started playing football in the 1890's, Florida has the fewest conference championships among the big 6 by a fairly wide margin
If you truly count all time going back to when teams first started playing football in the 1890's, Florida has the fewest conference championships among the big 6 by a fairly wide margin
Posted on 7/6/15 at 11:00 pm to auburnphan23
What about da crystal?
Posted on 7/6/15 at 11:00 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
If you truly count all time going back to when teams first started playing football in the 1890's, Florida has the fewest conference championships among the big 6 by a fairly wide margin
Surely you're not bringing up SIAA championships
ETA: And it's not a wide margin... it's 12 vs. 8 (11 if you count the probation titles)
This post was edited on 7/6/15 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 7/6/15 at 11:00 pm to auburnphan23
Since college football warehouse is dedicated to college football history, I would take their opinion over yours. Right? 
Posted on 7/6/15 at 11:03 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
I would take their rankings over any other I have seen, but that doesn't mean they are perfect.
They ranked Vandy 41st. Most rankings have Vandy near the very bottom, which I don't agree with, but 41st? That's only 6 spots behind Clemson.
Oh, and South Carolina is 61st.
This post was edited on 7/6/15 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 7/6/15 at 11:05 pm to redeye
You're gonna confuse him even more now.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 11:08 pm to PAGator
Why not? Alabama counts national championships from that time and most every other conference claims league championships from that time. Every team obviously counts wins and losses from that time. The SEC teams that won them generally list them on their official website
Posted on 7/6/15 at 11:11 pm to auburnphan23
Because it wasn't really a conference, not in a modern sense. It was like 20 something schools and there were only 3 or 4 conference games. The Big Ten and Big 8 existed in their (near) modern state at the time so you can't really count them the same.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 11:14 pm to PAGator
If you count probation titles, I guess Auburn should claim 93. We had the best record that year and beat Florida head to head
Auburn and Alabama also finished with the same number of losses in either 71 or 72, but bama won the conference title by themselves because they played and won one extra conference game. Seems pretty odd to me.
Auburn and Alabama also finished with the same number of losses in either 71 or 72, but bama won the conference title by themselves because they played and won one extra conference game. Seems pretty odd to me.
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News