Started By
Message
Is this the year Arkansas finally beats A&M?
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:56 pm
Arkansas is the only West team to not beat A&M since they joined the SEC. Hawgs still hold a commanding lead overall (41–29–3)
13
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:56 pm to craigbiggio
Not with Fat arse at the helm.
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:57 pm to craigbiggio
Yes
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:58 pm to craigbiggio
there is always next year...
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:58 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
(41–29–3)
Damn, we are going to blow this
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:01 pm to rockiee
I honestly didn't know Arkansas owned that arse that bad before I looked it up just now
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:04 pm to craigbiggio
If a 12 game lead is considered commanding, what would a 26 game lead be called?
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:06 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
I honestly didn't know Arkansas owned that arse that bad before I looked it up just now
Yep, I think that is why the older crowd takes the A&M loses harder than the younger ones.
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:07 pm to craigbiggio
No
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:07 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
Is this the year Arkansas finally beats A&M?
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:08 pm to texag7
Are you seriously riding Bama dick because I pointed out that Arkansas owns A&M historically? 
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:15 pm to craigbiggio
Didn't think you would answer that one.
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:24 pm to texag7
Commanding is probably the same word I would use tbh. Not sure if it's more embarrassing trailing a blue blood by 26 or Arkansas by 12. Splitting hairs at that point
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:30 pm to craigbiggio
Nah, we play them in September. If the game was in November, they would beat us like a drum .
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:32 pm to craigbiggio
It's one series I have never been able to understand. Both programs are nearly identical in all historical facets. I think part of it is Arkansas' best decade was the '60s, which was by far the worst for A&M. And A&M's best decade in the '90s, Arkansas was not good, but they left in '92, so it didn't even up.
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:39 pm to RoscoeHarper
quote:
I think part of it is Arkansas' best decade was the '60s, which was by far the worst for A&M.
Yep, Ark. was 9-1 in the 60's so if you take out that decade then Ark. only leads 32-28-3
Posted on 5/17/17 at 2:04 pm to Pygthagorean Theorem
quote:
Pygthagorean Theorem
Why do you even post on here? All you do is post mopey shite that no one wants to hear.
Posted on 5/17/17 at 2:09 pm to RoscoeHarper
quote:
RoscoeHarper
It's one series I have never been able to understand. Both programs are nearly identical in all historical facets. I think part of it is Arkansas' best decade was the '60s, which was by far the worst for A&M. And A&M's best decade in the '90s, Arkansas was not good, but they left in '92, so it didn't even up.
It is odder than that.
For all the "ownage" Arkansas had for us in the SWC, they sure didn't get much mileage out of it. SWC titles tells a totally different story:
SWC Titles
==========
Arkansas: 14 titles (7 of them outright)
A&M: 17 titles (15 of them outright)
A&M from post WWII to the late 60s were historic Kansas State/South Carolina bad with just a couple of years of exceptions. It just seems that Arkansas would have been able to win more SWC titles than A&M (and especially more outright titles). Texas owned that conference with 25 titles (19 outright).
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 5/17/17 at 2:11 pm to Porcine Human
quote:
Porcine Human
GFY. Sorry I don't drink the koolaid and don't shite out sunshine and rainbows about our head coach. If you can't handle the honesty, go back to Hogville to get all of the sunshine pumping you can handle.
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 5/17/17 at 2:34 pm to Pygthagorean Theorem
quote:
Pygthagorean Theorem
So pleasant.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News