Started By
Message

Is LSU really transitioning to a 3-4 defense?

Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:16 pm
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75823 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:16 pm
I've seen this posted on the LSURb and the SECRb regarding their recruitment of 6'4" 290 pound DE Shavar Manuel.

He appears to be a perfect fit at DT in their current system, but a few LSU posters are saying they are moving to a 3-4 so he would be an End for them.

I haven't seen anything else regarding this schematic change. Is it legit?

ETA: I guess it makes sense with Steele as the DC.
This post was edited on 6/28/15 at 5:17 pm
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43782 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:17 pm to
It's Steele's base D, so a lot of people seem to suspect LSU will head in the direction. Personally, I believe if LSU keeps recruiting DBs the way they are they will stay in a base 4-3, but spend most of the time in a Nickel or 4-2-5, just like they have since 2010.
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:19 pm to
Is LSU transitioning back to losing to Alabama every year?

Oh wait, they already have.

Posted by FourThreeForty
Member since May 2013
17290 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:22 pm to
Copying daddy.
Posted by Purplehaze44
Member since Jun 2015
1432 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:22 pm to
Based on the current coaching staff and the recruits they're going after, it seems an eventual transition is likely, not set in stone, but likely. We'll probably see a good bit of 3-4 packages intermittently throughout the year, and if they go well then we may see a full shift in the next couple years. Linebacker depth is a problem right now for a 3-4, but we seem to be recruiting pass rushing DE/LB hybrids to fill that depth in contrast to Chavis's preferred smaller but quicker LBs.
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
28988 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

It's Steele's base D, so a lot of people seem to suspect LSU will head in the direction. Personally, I believe if LSU keeps recruiting DBs the way they are they will stay in a base 4-3, but spend most of the time in a Nickel or 4-2-5, just like they have since 2010.




this. LSU isn't recruiting for strictly a 3-4, or at least that what recruits are saying
Posted by public_enemy
Member since Feb 2015
4363 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:23 pm to
shite like this has no place here. I'm assuming the op was asking a legitimate question looking for real reponses. Grow the frick up please.
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75823 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Linebacker depth is a problem right now for a 3-4, but we seem to be recruiting pass rushing DE/LB hybrids to fill that depth in contrast to Chavis's preferred smaller but quicker LBs.


Aren't y'all hot and heavy after Keion Joyner though? He fits the description of a Chavis LB.
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
50521 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:25 pm to
Ron Swanson hates you
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75823 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

shite like this has no place here. I'm assuming the op was asking a legitimate question looking for real reponses.


Have an upvote. I don't want this to spiral into a pissing match.

I honestly want to know if it is happening.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43782 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Aren't y'all hot and heavy after Keion Joyner though? He fits the description of a Chavis LB.


LSU's D is based around speed and he fits the mold of a 4-2-5 LB. I really don't think much with change with the base.
Posted by Purplehaze44
Member since Jun 2015
1432 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

Aren't y'all hot and heavy after Keion Joyner though? He fits the description of a Chavis LB.


We are, but we also are getting guys like Thorton and Fowler that could play either DE or 3-4 pass rushing LB, depending on where we decide they're needed and what kind of weight training we give them.
Posted by Purplehaze44
Member since Jun 2015
1432 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:39 pm to
Like I said it's not set in stone, it is Steele's defensive style, and we seem to be getting a couple guys that would fit that system well, but would also benefit a 4-3 or 4-2-5. I think Steele runs whatever we're strongest with which is why I see us trying it out a decent amount in 2015 (though it will still be mostly 4-3) and based on how successful we are with it will go from there.
Posted by DVinBR
Member since Jan 2013
12925 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:53 pm to
who isn't recruiting a top 10 recruit?
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38197 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 6:00 pm to
No. We're going more multiple instead of the vanilla Chavis crap. 4-3 under, 3-4, 2-4-5, etc
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
72825 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Copying daddy.


Who is daddy exactly?
Posted by FightinTiga
Pumpkin Center
Member since Feb 2009
20745 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 6:06 pm to
They're just concerned
Posted by deathlock
Member since Jun 2015
95 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 6:09 pm to
Regardless of scheme, LSU's defense will have to pitch shut outs all year if the Tigers are going to win more than 8 games with that offense.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 6:10 pm to
More of hybrid between the 4-3/3-4 scheme.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 6:11 pm to
I think we're just going multiple, really.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter