Started By
Message
If Mizzou wins the East again this year, and somehow actually wins the SECCG
Posted on 8/24/15 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 8/24/15 at 1:49 pm
was the East down again? For that matter, was the entire SEC down?
13
Posted on 8/24/15 at 1:50 pm to mizzoukills
Killz GOAT 
Posted on 8/24/15 at 1:50 pm to mizzoukills
yall really need to quit being so insecure.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 1:56 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
For that matter, was the entire SEC down?
By definition
Posted on 8/24/15 at 1:56 pm to mizzoukills
Missouri will never win the SEC as long as the West exists.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 1:57 pm to rmnldr
quote:
The East will never win the SEC as long as the West exists.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 1:58 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:
The East will never win the SEC as long as the West exists.
Fair enough.
But if Mizzou were to pull it off within the next few years...would the excuse be that the entire SEC was down?
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:03 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
But if Mizzou were to pull it off within the next few years...would the excuse be that the entire SEC was down?
It depends.
Mizzou wins no other SEC team finishes in the top 5 = SEC is down.
Mizzou wins and both them and another SEC team finishes in the top 5 = legit.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:05 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
was the East down again? For that matter, was the entire SEC down?
This question seems about 3 or 4 months premature. How the hell is anyone supposed to answer this when there hasn't even been a game played.
I know you don't expect real answers and are trolling, but you can do better. This is sad.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:10 pm to madmaxvol
madmaxvol
Thanks, Max, for the well thought out response. I'm impressed.
I wish other people would follow your lead.
quote:
It depends. Mizzou wins no other SEC team finishes in the top 5 = SEC is down. Mizzou wins and both them and another SEC team finishes in the top 5 = legit.
Thanks, Max, for the well thought out response. I'm impressed.
I wish other people would follow your lead.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:25 pm to mizzoukills
Haven't you heard? Some talking heads outside the SEC are already saying the SEC is down now.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:36 pm to mizzoukills
You know the answer will be yes and yes.
I don't care if they are up, down, or in the middle. M-I-Z!!!!!
I don't care if they are up, down, or in the middle. M-I-Z!!!!!
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:43 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Answer the questions, WG.
it's literally impossible to answer considering nobody has played a game yet? How shoudl we know if the league is down or not?
Y'all somehow think that people are ONLY saying the east has been down because missouri has won. That's not true. When we won it in 2011 it was largely due to the east being down, I think we lost to pretty much every good team we played that year. Similar to Missouri of 2014, we lost to probably the "best" team in the division (SC) but won the division anyway. It's not like we're singling out missouri, it's happened many times. Hell, there are some years in the 90s where the west winner was barely above average. It happens.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:46 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
Mizzou wins and both them and another SEC team finishes in the top 5 = legit.
2013 Mizzou SEC East Title:
Final Rankings
South Carolina #4
Mizzou #5
Therefore the East wasnt down. In fact its only the third time two East teams finished in the top 5 and the first time in a decade its happened.
But yeah...the East was "down"
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:49 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Y'all somehow think that people are ONLY saying the east has been down because missouri has won. That's not true. When we won it in 2011 it was largely due to the east being down, I think we lost to pretty much every good team we played that year. Similar to Missouri of 2014, we lost to probably the "best" team in the division (SC) but won the division anyway. It's not like we're singling out missouri, it's happened many times. Hell, there are some years in the 90s where the west winner was barely above average. It happens.
The East wasnt down in 2013. Some of you all just didnt like the teams that represented the power in the division that year. Some of you will own that and some of you will make illogical arguments because it was USCe and Mizzou instead of Georgia,Tennessee or Florida.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:50 pm to kilo
quote:
2013 Mizzou SEC East Title:
Final Rankings
South Carolina #4
Mizzou #5
And the only other east team to finish the season ranked was a 4 loss vanderbilt team.
the 2 teams at the top were both legit, but the other 5 were bad. That doesn't mean the east was strong, it means those 2 teams were strong.
Again, yall have security issues in that you think that JUST because missouri won we're finding any way to downplay it.
The last time missouri didn't win it (2012) you had 3 east teams finish the season ranked in the top 10, with another in the top 20. That's a much different situation than 2013.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:51 pm to mizzoukills
I think Mizzou is going to be great.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:52 pm to kilo
2013 Mizzou was certainly legit.
I mean, we beat Georgia between the hedges. Enough said.
I mean, we beat Georgia between the hedges. Enough said.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:52 pm to kilo
quote:
The East wasnt down in 2013. Some of you all just didnt like the teams that represented the power in the division that year.
that's simply not true, see my post directly after yours. In '13 there were 2 teams worth a flip, doens't matter what their name is. The other 5 were largely irrelevant.
Look at the 90s...UF/UT were elite the whole decade while UGA was a perennial 8ish win team and nobody else was even worth wasting breath on. Just because UF/UT happened to be extremely good football teams doesn't mean that the division was all that great. Because overall, it wasn't. It was a 2 man show every year. This website didnt' exist in the 90s though so you aren't seeing people make those comments.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News