Started By
Message
re: If conference goes to 16 teams, should we invite Tulane and GT back?
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:20 pm to BoomNation
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:20 pm to BoomNation
Why the hell do you guys want NCST? Because they look ok this year? This is lazy AF analysis on about 85% of this thread. NCST is no better than Mizzou or Texas A&M and it is not debateable. NCST brings very little to the TV market as Raleigh isnt exactly a mecca. Their stadium is ok but Carter Finley isnt all that.
If the SEC wants TV markets VT and Texas are your guys.
NCST or UCF add nothing. To suggest they are is like a dumbass AD taking the hot young coach without thinking through it clearly.
If the SEC wants TV markets VT and Texas are your guys.
NCST or UCF add nothing. To suggest they are is like a dumbass AD taking the hot young coach without thinking through it clearly.
2
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:35 pm to magildachunks
If the conference expands, they're not going to do so by doubling down in markets they already completely own like Georgia and Louisiana.
They'll look to go to North Carolina, Virginia or Oklahoma.
They'll look to go to North Carolina, Virginia or Oklahoma.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:35 pm to magildachunks
I think you guys should bring in UNLV, University of Toronto, and South Lake Carroll High School.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:56 pm to TheDude321
Get rid of Arkie and Mizzou and stay at 12
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:58 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
I'd take both back if the SEC gets turned down by Texas or Oklahoma or Oklahoma State. I'd like to see GA Tech back in the SEC in a way. I don't care for Tulane back in the SEC unless you want to have a beatable team in the SEC West to sort of schedule a break for the power teams.
Vandy West
we need to make this happen
would restore the power balance between East & West
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:59 pm to magildachunks
GT would win the East every year.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:00 pm to ChopBlockOclock
quote:
To suggest they are is like a dumbass AD taking the hot young coach without thinking through it clearly.
or somebody like Eaux or Lyle
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:03 pm to magildachunks
Including Sewanee?
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:14 pm to magildachunks
quote:
all the OGs
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:15 pm to magildachunks
No to Ga. Tech
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:17 pm to magildachunks
Tulane and Ga Tech can screw each other.
2 for 16: Virginia team and Oklahoma team.
4 for 18: N Carolina team and another Texas team. I would like UT just to watch the Aggies heads explode!
2 for 16: Virginia team and Oklahoma team.
4 for 18: N Carolina team and another Texas team. I would like UT just to watch the Aggies heads explode!
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:20 pm to magildachunks
quote:
Bring back all the OGs
Sure, we could bring back Sewanee too, right.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:22 pm to memphis tiger
quote:
Sure, we could bring back Sewanee too, right.
No we cannot.
They are div-III and therefore do not qualify.
Let's be realistic folks.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:31 pm to magildachunks
GT....yeah.
Tulane.....no frickin way.
Tulane.....no frickin way.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:37 pm to ChopBlockOclock
quote:
Why the hell do you guys want NCST? Because they look ok this year? This is lazy AF analysis on about 85% of this thread. NCST is no better than Mizzou or Texas A&M and it is not debateable. NCST brings very little to the TV market as Raleigh isnt exactly a mecca. Their stadium is ok but Carter Finley isnt all that.
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill (basically one city) is over 2 mill in population. So, you are dead wrong about the market. North Carolina and Duke will never, ever join the SEC. It is a question of history and pride. Plus they have multibillion dollar endowments so they do not need us in the least. NC State is just different.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 11:30 pm to dkreller
quote:
GT would win the East every year.
I believe their robotics team would dominate
Posted on 10/18/17 at 12:21 am to RD Dawg
1. We already have 100% coverage in Texas. We don't want another Texas team.
2. We want teams from populous states NOT already represented in the SEC.
3. NC State would get us mucho coverage in a populous state. Virginia Tech would do the same for Virginia and the DC market.
4. Forget Oklahoma. State is too small and their legislature demands both Ok State and OU remain in the same conference. We would LOSE money in the SEC payout of we took those two schools.
2. We want teams from populous states NOT already represented in the SEC.
3. NC State would get us mucho coverage in a populous state. Virginia Tech would do the same for Virginia and the DC market.
4. Forget Oklahoma. State is too small and their legislature demands both Ok State and OU remain in the same conference. We would LOSE money in the SEC payout of we took those two schools.
Posted on 10/18/17 at 4:57 am to magildachunks
We don't want the GnaTs!
Posted on 10/18/17 at 5:02 am to calcotron
No you don't. 16 = 4x4 pods that you can pair up each year to get your "divisions". & everybody is played at least once every 3 years.
SEC Championship Game
Year 1: A/B winner vrs. C/D winner
Year 2: A/C winner vrs. B/D winner
Year 3: A/D winner vrs. B/C winner
SEC Championship Game
Year 1: A/B winner vrs. C/D winner
Year 2: A/C winner vrs. B/D winner
Year 3: A/D winner vrs. B/C winner
This post was edited on 10/18/17 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 10/18/17 at 5:05 am to BoomNation
It was a scheduling nightmare in their plans:
Pod A
Pod B (rotate with Pod C yearly)
Pod C (rotate with Pod B yearly)
Pod D
Pods A&D were NEVER set to meet!
Pod A
Pod B (rotate with Pod C yearly)
Pod C (rotate with Pod B yearly)
Pod D
Pods A&D were NEVER set to meet!
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News