Started By
Message
re: I Really Don't Think Washington Gets In, Here's Why....
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:01 am to Hussss
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:01 am to Hussss
quote:
Schedule absolutely sucked. They were never in the game with the only Blue Blood they played (USC).
So, has this changed since last Tuesday? Last Tuesday the committee told you they didn't give a shite about this.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:01 am to Tillman
Don't be surprised to see Mich instead of Penn St. since they beat the Big 10 champ by 39, lost in double OT to OH St on several controversial calls, and lost by only 3 on the road. They are a Blue Blood and have a Rock Star coach ... remember, it's all about ratings and money, NOT what's FAIR.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:03 am to Hussss
michigan has no shot with 2 losses and no conference title.
This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 9:05 am
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:04 am to Hussss
quote:
We will see...
obviously
i think OSU is a lock. it comes down to Penn State or wasshington for 4th. i'm going with penn state simply b/c the com is so high on OSU but will feel bad if they pass over a team that beat OSU. and won big 10 title.
This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 9:07 am
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:07 am to Hussss
quote:
Not a Blue Blood
80 million West Coast viewers... they getting in.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:09 am to Tillman
Glad to see you are not one of the HATERS flaming away about how Washington is definitely in. Their schedule and victories are a complete JOKE. May as well have W Mich in if Wash makes it.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:14 am to Hussss
Conference championships need to mean something. This year shows this "system" is still pure bullshite. When you win something on the field and you are stepped over by a beauty queen that didnt really get it done on the field how much sense does that make?
This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 9:20 am
Posted on 12/4/16 at 9:15 am to Hussss
fact Michigan beat Colorado pretty bad helps make case for PSU over washington.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News