Started By
Message
re: Hypothetical Scenario
Posted on 7/5/15 at 12:31 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 7/5/15 at 12:31 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
I'm pretty sure that the following numbers solidify my point:
58-10
45-33
35-28
1
Posted on 7/5/15 at 12:33 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
I'm pretty sure that the following numbers solidify my point:
I have numbers that suggest otherwise:
41-27-3
Those numbers say go get your fricking shine box.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 12:39 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
State had a top SEC QB and a defense worth a damn
Posted on 7/5/15 at 12:39 pm to Korin
quote:
That should've been in place in 03
Nobody in the country could have beaten LSU that day in Atlanta
Posted on 7/5/15 at 12:41 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Nobody in the country could have beaten LSU that day in Atlanta
The National Champion that year, SC could have.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 12:43 pm to DaleDenton
You used to at least try to hide your hook 
Posted on 7/5/15 at 1:03 pm to skrayper
quote:
#1 The new tie breaker is the combined conference record of the cross divisional opponents. If that is also a tie, it's a coin flip. Rankings no longer matter.
if that's the case A&M is already fricked in all tiebreaker scenarios b/c Derek Mason has cratered Vandy
Posted on 7/5/15 at 1:09 pm to Dr RC
That's a stupid scenario, you're assuming that all 3 beat Bama and auburn.
You can't actually believe that?
You can't actually believe that?
This post was edited on 7/5/15 at 1:14 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News