Started By
Message
How does the Fluker situation differ from the Langham situation?
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:21 pm
I keep hearing about Langham, but I'm not familiar with the story. What happened with Langham, and how is it different than this situation?
2
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:24 pm to ezrulz
Langham signed his name on a napkin and accepted a steak dinner.
Fluker used a few crooks to go to NoLA.
That is how I see it.
Fluker used a few crooks to go to NoLA.
That is how I see it.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:27 pm to cjared036
Pretty sure Bama admin copped to knowing about his being ineligible in hopes of getting off light.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:28 pm to cjared036
quote:
Langham signed his name on a napkin
Ive always loved the napkin excuse.
There were also other aspects besides Langham in that infraction ruling
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:47 pm to ezrulz
The biggest thing was how Alabama handled it. They basically said "screw you" to the NCAA so the NCAA broke their dick off in us.
I don't think that'll happen this time. We learned our lesson.
I don't think that'll happen this time. We learned our lesson.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:51 pm to cjared036
quote:
How does the Fluker situation differ from the Langham situation?
Langham actually signed with an agent and got some benefit, then decided to return to Bama. Coach Stallings didn't like the NCAA investigator and kicked them out of his office. That led to greater problems.
Fluker didn't sign with agent, but apparently took money from runner. This time Bama is investigating and will cooperate in any investigation should one begin.
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 4:09 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
Fluker didn't sign with agent, but apparently took money from runner. This time Bama is investigating and will cooperate in any investigation should one begin.
Along with Mark Barron and rumors of Stinson
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News