Started By
Message

re: Had an interesting conversation with a former SEC football player

Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:47 pm to
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:47 pm to
I just want to make a general comment that the concept of amateurism as some kind of important sports principle is outdated.

If somebody wants to argue that the university itself shouldn't be paying salaried athletes, I can buy that argument, but there is no good reason why an athlete can't use his own name and likeness for marketing purposes. The only reason why they can't is to protect revenue streams for the schools, conferences, the NCAA, and tv networks.
This post was edited on 5/4/16 at 12:48 pm
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8174 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

they ARE breaking the law because of a little something called tax evasion. Did your guy pay taxes on the 2500 doubt it, did Mom doubt that oo


Stiff penalties heading their way. Do you worry if they drive without a seatbelt?
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20471 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

frick the guy that takes money to support his family instead of listening to the NCAA's rules



It's already been established that that whole story is a line of OM bullshite.
Posted by TouchdownTony
Central Alabama
Member since Apr 2016
9656 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:49 pm to
Bottom line, EVERYBODY buys or pays for some players. Maybe to get them initially or help them out during their tenure. Yes, your school does too.

4 and 5 star guys let it known what the price is. If you don't bid, thats your business but you have zero chance of landing them. Not all get money or gifts but the top notch guys do. If you compete your school is doing it. I played at a D2 school for a year and I can tell you without a doubt some got money even at that level. I can also tell you not everybody gets money and I know that for a fact.
This post was edited on 5/4/16 at 12:50 pm
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:51 pm to
quote:


It's already been established that that whole story is a line of OM bull shite.
Where did Hugh Freeze and the network touch you?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139776 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:51 pm to
Unless OM sent the money directly to the power company then I call bullshite on this particular instance. I wonder how many times a perfectly good and working car was "fixed" with money from OM.

Frick paying these players unless you make the football team a for profit venture, stop making the players go to school if they don't want to study and stop reducing entrance requirements for those that do want to actually go to classes and graduate.

Amateur doesn't mean diddly any longer so pull the curtains back fully and see what develops from that.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8174 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:52 pm to
FYI, I laugh every time I see someone use the nickname Boss Hog. I don't know why. I think I picture the old man from DOH trying to play football.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20471 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Where did Hugh Freeze and the network touch you?




As far as I know, Freeze hasn't been implicated here.

But I'm not going to buy into the shite because of an invented sob story.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68437 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:02 pm to
Really? Established by who? People speculating on a message board don't count
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

If somebody wants to argue that the university itself shouldn't be paying salaried athletes, I can buy that argument, but there is no good reason why an athlete can't use his own name and likeness for marketing purposes.


I agree with this 100%.


I doubt we will see this happen though, because people will start saying "What about the needs of the players who are not offered those opportunities." We have become a society that thinks everybody has to be equal in every way....doesn't matter how much talent they have, how smart they are or how hard they work....they should have everything that everybody else has.
Posted by WonderWartHawg
Member since Dec 2010
10397 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:04 pm to
A lot of illegal aliens send money back to Mexico too. Does that make it alright?
Posted by rebsfan10
Member since Dec 2013
1564 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

it doesn't matter what they do with money they are not supposed to be receiving. The way you tell it, it would be ok for a heroin dealer to sell his stuff on the streets but it's ok because he took care of mom.
they ARE breaking the law because of a little something called tax evasion. Did your guy pay taxes on the 2500 doubt it, did Mom doubt that oo


Guess we better start using our tax dollars to prosecute all waiters and anyone else who gets cash tips. Guarantee you they're not reporting that income.
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15369 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

, I can buy that argument, but there is no good reason why an athlete can't use his own name and likeness for marketing purposes.


Youre absolutely right. There is no law that Jacob Eason cannot go out and sign autographs for money or appear in commercials or accept cash from people. There is no law. He just can't play football at UGA and do it.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8174 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:06 pm to
Well, I think one argument would be that they would sell their likeness but it would really be paying for them to go to a booster's school. Its definitely a pandora's box. I wish that all of the schools in the NCAA would just get together, pool some money, and give them a little more than they do now. I know its a flawed thought but I don't really know the best answer.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Guess we better start using our tax dollars to prosecute all waiters and anyone else who gets cash tips. Guarantee you they're not reporting that income.


I'm trying to grasp the essence of your argument, here. Are you saying that since there is graft and corruption, then all of it should be allowed?

Because we have a lot of crooked politicians that would be glad to hear that. I'm sure Bernie madoff would be happy, too.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Youre absolutely right. There is no law that Jacob Eason cannot go out and sign autographs for money or appear in commercials or accept cash from people. There is no law. He just can't play football at UGA and do it.

What other feasible option does he have to continue pursuing a career in football while getting a paycheck?

Colleges have the market on 18-22 years old football monopolized. There is no other avenue to choose.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8174 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Colleges have the market on 18-22 years old football monopolized.



Because nobody is interested in paying of it. And the professional leagues aren't that interested either.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Youre absolutely right. There is no law that Jacob Eason cannot go out and sign autographs for money or appear in commercials or accept cash from people. There is no law. He just can't play football at UGA and do it.


I think his point was...it SHOULD be ok for them to cash in on their likeness and play. IF EA comes out with a computer football game with Nick Chubb's number and name as a player, shouldn't he be compensated for it? I mean, I have no problem with a school making a profit off of Chubb. Chubb is getting something in return. An education. But why should a game maker make money off his name and likeness if he can't?
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Because nobody is interested in paying of it. And the professional leagues aren't that interested either.


Why would the professional leagues pay for it when they have a free farm league already grandfathered in?

You're wrong that nobody is interested in paying for it. If that were true, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Posted by lsufan31
MS
Member since Mar 2013
2176 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

they are precluded from realizing their market value immediately by the system in place



This is true for everyone who is not working in general labor, or fast food. I had to finish college, and put 10 years in to the industry before I finally got some breaks. And I don't believe ANY 18 year old kid should be different.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter