Started By
Message

re: Georgia proposes SEC ban transfers already booted for assault/domestic violence

Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by Eric4tigers
Member since Apr 2015
994 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22326 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:44 pm to
I support.
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
24094 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:49 pm to
I didn't want him in the first place. But it seems weird to bring up Taylor, when the woman was arrested for lying to police about the incident.
Posted by bigdawg7780
SC
Member since Oct 2013
2788 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 1:04 pm to
Because he was kicked out for this before going to Alabama?
Posted by The Nino
Member since Jan 2010
21520 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 1:05 pm to
I think most would agree with this
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46175 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 1:18 pm to
This would be a stupid rule. Just let the schools decide if they want to take them. Alabama looked stupid because of Taylor and I'm sure they learned from the mistake.

Just because you make one mistake in your life doesn't necessarily mean you should never be able to play SEC football again.
Posted by jdevers
Member since Nov 2008
2059 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 1:22 pm to
Good start. Honestly though it should be changed to read anyone kicked off a team for ANY illegality. I know there are lots of minor crimes, but people aren't kicked off of teams or out of school for them.

Collegiate athletics is a privilege and the players are adults. Junior high and high school mistakes are the mistakes of minors and there should be some leniency there for change and forgiveness.
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46175 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Good start. Honestly though it should be changed to read anyone kicked off a team for ANY illegality. I know there are lots of minor crimes, but people aren't kicked off of teams or out of school for them.

Why? Even if it's a major crime, if they've learned from their mistake and gone through the proper punishment, they should be able to play football.

No school is going to take those high risks guys very often.

Nick Marshall is not a bad guy (as far as I know). Cam Newton is a great guy and role model. With this rule in place, those statements might not be true
This post was edited on 5/24/15 at 1:28 pm
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 1:32 pm to
It's not, a thug like Jonathan Taylor should have some sort of consequences for his actions.
This post was edited on 5/24/15 at 7:39 pm
Posted by h0bnail
Member since Sep 2009
7382 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Maybe Georgia shouldn't introduce these derelicts to the conference to begin with


Maybe you should check his list of offers before throwing stones.
Posted by Rabern57
Alabama
Member since Jan 2010
13361 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 1:50 pm to
Richt just wants to use this to keep players from transferring out after they get in trouble. By telling them if they want to leave they can't go to the SEC and hope that makes them stay.

Maybe he should come up with rules to keep his players in line and he won't have to worry about them getting in trouble to start with or become the bad thugs that need to be banned from the SEC.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 2:14 pm to
It's pretty unbelievable that there would even be cause for a discussion about a rule like this, but I would be opposed to the rule. If a school wants to further compromise their admissions requirements, that's their prerogative.
Posted by InfernoOrangeSS
Pelham, AL
Member since Mar 2014
815 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

The only reason the rule would be written that way (sec ban only) is because the conference doesn't have the authority to do anything about the other leagues. We can't tell the big 12 what to do so why not start where we can? Why should one state pass a law when there isn't an identical law in the next state? You do what you have the authority to do. Anyone saying this is a bad idea is letting their dislike of UGA cloud their judgement. How is it controversial at all to say guys like Jonathan Taylor shouldn't be allowed to play in the SEC? It's extremely common sense.


I completely agree. It's worded the way it is because the SEC can only govern the SEC. Anything more broad would have to come from the NCAA. I think anyone decrying this idea is only doing it out of a dislike for UGA. It sounds to me like a good idea.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30589 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Because he was kicked out for this before going to Alabama?
Has he been convicted of the charge in GA. yet?..what was the sentence?
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
25656 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

I think anyone decrying this idea is only doing it out of a dislike for UGA. It sounds to me like a good idea.


You're obviously a bammer alter... ......


quote:

Under an SEC legislative proposal that Georgia is sponsoring, athletes like Taylor could not transfer to an SEC school if they had been disciplined for “serious misconduct” by a school or athletic department while enrolled at another college. Sexual assault, domestic violence, stalking, dating violence or other forms of physical violence would be considered serious misconduct.


I think these were cited as examples of "serious misconduct" not the only things that would fall under this umbrella. I would think being dismissed from school for felony theft from the school or other students/teammates even if the charges are pleaded down due to 1st offender statutes, beating up other students, weapon offenses, felony drug offenses, etc.. would/could also come under the same "serious misconduct" heading...
This post was edited on 5/24/15 at 3:13 pm
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9414 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 3:02 pm to
Good. I'm sick of Saban bringing thugs to UA. They can have their 2nd or 3rd chance somewhere else.
Posted by AthDawg7
Member since Oct 2013
132 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Richt just wants to use this to keep players from transferring out after they get in trouble. By telling them if they want to leave they can't go to the SEC and hope that makes them stay.


Are you really that stupid? The players are not transferring out on their own they are kicked off the team. Even if they wanted to stay they can't because they have been dismissed.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55217 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 3:03 pm to
I support this.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48888 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

This is a good thing. Saban was morally wrong.
Posted by JETigER
LSU 2011 National Champions
Member since Dec 2003
7081 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 3:08 pm to
the commercial "It's on us/me" to stop domestic abuse will never have Nick Saban in it.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter