Started By
Message
re: Early Point Spread Projections for all SEC Games
Posted on 6/5/12 at 3:44 pm to gatordmb89
Posted on 6/5/12 at 3:44 pm to gatordmb89
quote:quote:
Georgia -1.5 at Auburn
Should be a pk.
0
Posted on 6/5/12 at 3:45 pm to Slippery Slope
You need more "!!!!!!!"
Posted on 6/5/12 at 3:48 pm to parkjas2001
DON'T YOU TELL ME WHAT TO DO. I WILL CHOKE YOU OUT.
Posted on 6/5/12 at 3:48 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
@ UGA: AU leads 22-16-2
@ AU: UGA leads 14-12-2
Neutral : UGA leads 21-16-2
You math does not add up, Auburn leads the series.. Where did you get your info... You have it as UGA 51-Auburn 50 with 6 ties...
The actual official Record: 54-53-8...
Link Provided as Proof
Posted on 6/5/12 at 3:51 pm to Grateful Reb
quote:
Tennessee -1 at Vanderbilt
Posted on 6/5/12 at 3:52 pm to WDE24
quote:
Projected standings if the favorite won every game
Mississippi State 5-3
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:09 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Stassen also says that UF/UGA started in 1904 though. 
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:10 pm to USMC Gators
cause it did 
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:15 pm to USMC Gators
nope, 1904.
btw, i was wiki'ing all of this and found out that apparently since 2009 GA/FLA winners get the okefenokee oar
when did that start happening?
btw, i was wiki'ing all of this and found out that apparently since 2009 GA/FLA winners get the okefenokee oar
when did that start happening?
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:17 pm to Damn Good Dawg
That stupid oar started in 09 as an agreement between the student bodies.
And 1915.
And 1915.
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:19 pm to USMC Gators
1904, and that's gay
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:22 pm to Grateful Reb
Arkansas an undergdog to AU and USC? Thats a joke.
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:23 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Ive used stassen before but have noticed some of their historical errors.
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:24 pm to parkjas2001
this is the first time i have noticed but he is right about the AU/UGA record being wrong. i wonder what is going on over there?
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:24 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Arkansas an undergdog to AU and USC? Thats a joke.
Point spreads are not predictions.
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:25 pm to piggidyphish
quote:
I like Georgia in this one. Home field doesn't seem to mean all that much when these two play.
Misconception.
Maybe so. I didn't go back and research it. It just seems to me that the road team wins in this game about as often as the home team does. Of course, that's just in the 20-30 years that I've been paying attention to it. What happened in the early days, I have no idea.
This post was edited on 6/5/12 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:28 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
His point is that recently...UGA has won wherever the game has been played.
No, I was making the point that Auburn and Georgia both seem to beat each other on the road as much as they do at home.
ETA: FWIW, CFB Datawarehouse says the record is as follows:
@ Athens: Auburn leads 17-12-1
@ Auburn: Georgia leads 14-10-2
Last 30 years (1982-2011):
@Athens: Auburn leads 10-5
@Auburn: Georgia leads 8-6-1
So, I guess my general impression was correct (if I counted right).
This post was edited on 6/5/12 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 6/5/12 at 4:31 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
I really wish ppl would or could realize that these point spreads are not predictions. They are betting lines that the casinos feel will get the most money on each side of the bet.
While this is technically true, there are enough knowledgeable big money gamblers who would rape them if they had a spread that was too far off that the spreads they set initially are usually pretty close to what they think will happen. Then, if the money goes one way or the other, they will try to balance it by moving the spread. Some exceptions may be made for certain teams (like Notre Dame for years) that have an established history of biased betting on or against them.
This post was edited on 6/5/12 at 4:32 pm
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News