Started By
Message
re: Does anyone else miss having 3 cross divisional games a year
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:10 am to DarthRebel
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:10 am to DarthRebel
U have to have divisions to have a title game. I may be wrong on this and feel free to correct me. This is why the big 12 does not have one. they dont have enough teams to split into divisions plus they are in one conference
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:11 am to Duckie
quote:
yes. The SEC can't hold off 9 sec game schedules for much longer though.
The SEC can't maintain permanent cross season opponents much longer
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:12 am to mrbroker
quote:
U have to have divisions to have a title game. I may be wrong on this and feel free to correct me
Nah they changed the rule
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:18 am to Cockopotamus
quote:
The SEC can't maintain permanent cross season opponents much longer
The day that UGA/AU and Bama/UT don't play yearly is the day the SEC will essentially die inside.
I understand the SEC is a corporation hellbent on maximizing profits and will do basically anything to bow down to the almight dollar, but there's something to be said for tradition, which is one thing that makes CFB 1000x better than the pros.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:24 am to Farmer1906
quote:
We need to ditch the 2 divisions.
lol... no.
The divisional format and SECCG is what's made the SEC the King of Conferences.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:30 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
The day that UGA/AU and Bama/UT don't play yearly is the day the SEC will essentially die inside.
What's helping their decision is the fact that Tennessee is down. IMO if Tennessee, LSU, Bama, Florida, and UGA were all top 12 teams the rest of the country wouldn't say shite. The SEC actually needs Tennessee to be good to keep some of the tradition
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:34 am to Duckie
quote:Yes they can. Alabama runs the SEC offices and they will always get what they want. They want to play their pussy arse game with Tennessee every year. No way in the world they give that up.
The SEC can't hold off 9 sec game schedules for much longer though.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 10:54 am to Teague
quote:
I'd rather just go back to a 12 team SEC.
I say 13 teams. Kick Missouri out
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:01 am to d1 bound
quote:
I say 13 teams. Kick Missouri out
They've actually been more successful than A&M so both of them can go back to the Big 12 but that's more about the TV deal
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:02 am to winston318
Yes, playing the same 7 teams every year makes the seasons kind of indistinguishable.
We only change one conference team, one major OOC team and then the scrubs.
We only change one conference team, one major OOC team and then the scrubs.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:05 am to winston318
quote:
I miss Kentucky even though we played them last season
I miss the annual LSU game, too. Having Georgia and LSU on our schedule every year was the highlight of our football schedule. They are two of the best-traveling fan bases and our fans love to go there. I hope someday we can resume the annual series.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:11 am to winston318
quote:
Who knows how long it will be until we play Georgia again because the last time we played they won
not the greatest example of cause and effect, but I enjoy watching LSU play UGA as well
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:11 am to IAmReality
quote:
It will be TWELEVE years before Bama makes a return trip to Athens, let that sink in how crazy and stupid that is.
LSU last played at South Carolina in 2008. They won't get back there until 2027.
Nineteen years.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:15 am to WildTchoupitoulas
A&M won't be coming to Lexington until 2025. It will have been 13 years since they joined the conference. We need to play 9 conference games.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:20 am to winston318
Just switch to a 9 game Conf Schedule
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:22 am to CrimsonCrusade
quote:
We desperately need to go to a 9 conference game schedule and eliminate the late season cupcakes.
Agreed. 9 conference games may have saved Auburn from the embarrassment against Jacksonville State, and Arky might have been able to avoid bolstering Toledo's resume.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:23 am to cave canem
9 conference
1 good OOC
2 creme puffs
That's fine.
We don't need 3 creme puff games a year.
1 good OOC
2 creme puffs
That's fine.
We don't need 3 creme puff games a year.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:29 am to Duckie
quote:Nick Saban has been lobbying for 9 SEC games since the most recent expansion. And literally every SEC program votes it down every year.
yes. The SEC can't hold off 9 sec game schedules for much longer though.
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:30 am to CockInYourEar
quote:
Just switch to a 9 game Conf Schedule
TBH Bama was the only school that would agree to a 9 game conference schedule.
quote:
Alleva went more in depth with his assessment that the mighty SEC was simply too powerful to play nine conference games. A 9-game SEC schedule would doom the league’s College Football Playoff chances because, by golly, everyone is just so good and can beat one another
This post was edited on 10/9/15 at 11:32 am
Posted on 10/9/15 at 11:37 am to CockInYourEar
quote:IF the fans want 9 game conference schedule, then the fans should petition your AD's. Blow up their email and bombard them with letters - tell them what you want.
Just switch to a 9 game Conf Schedule
Because this shite has been voted down since Saban suggested it years ago. The SEC needs a 9 game schedule, but because Alabama/Nick Saban has wanted it for years now the rest of the SEC (all 13 teams) vote that shite down every year.
Why?
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News