Started By
Message

re: Did Ole Miss make the right call in firing Cutcliffe in 2004

Posted on 8/3/15 at 10:02 am to
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68422 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 10:02 am to
Yes. He wasn't recruiting and refused to fire staff members go that needed to go. In 2004 we returned everyone from 2003 except for Eli and Chris Collins.
Posted by Feral
Member since Mar 2012
12350 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Probably...yes. They just made two awful hires after firing him.


Fixed
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25270 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 10:14 am to
quote:

How do you explain his success at Duke?


Duke isn't a pressure-cooker job and the ACC has been down relatively-speaking. Give Cut credit tho, he's been dying his hair and seems to be rejuvenated in Durham.

Not sure if the last 2 years are going to be sustainable, but he has clearly done a great job @ Duke.

Having Cutcliffe's offensive prowess with Hugh Freeze-esque recruiting would've been interesting to see. Other than Eli Manning and some decent OL, there wasn't a lot of NFL talent to work with @ Ole Miss during Cutcliffe's tenure.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32176 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Because it's Duke. Duh.
Exactly! They were winning one game per year before he got there.

ACC Coach of the Year (2012, 2013)
Walter Camp Coach of the Year (2013)
The Sporting News Co-Coach of the Year (2013)
Maxwell Football Club Coach of the Year (2013)
Bobby Dodd Coach of The Year (2013)
AFCA Coach of the Year (2013)
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46360 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 10:39 am to
If I saw another run on 3rd down and punt from him I would've strangled him on the field
Posted by WmWallace
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
1820 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 10:47 am to
yessssss!!!!!!
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 11:24 am to
No.

All it bought them was misery. Let's look at the historical record.

After a 10-2 1971, Billy Kinard never won more than 5 games in a season. Ken Cooper never won more than 6 games in a season and Steve Sloan never won more than 5.

Brewer averaged 6.2 wins & 5 losses
Tubs averaged 6.5 wins & 5 losses
Cutts averaged 7.2 wins & 4.8 losses
O averaged 3.3 wins & 8.3 losses
Reverend Nutt averaged 6 wins & 6.5 losses
Freezus has thus far averaged 8 wins & 5 losses

So, as we enter 2015 from a production standpoint the two best coaches at OM since Johnny Vaught retired have clearly been Cutcliff & Freeze. Freeze averages winning a little short of a game a season more and Cutt's average seasonal losses are just a bit better. In conference, Cutts was 25-23 in the SEC and Freeze is sitting at 11-13.

The difference? Freeze gets the benefit of playing the extra cupcake all SEC teams added when the NCAA went to a 12 game schedule in 2006. If Cutts had that game, he's probably got a half dozen more wins.

Firing Cutcliffe accomplished nothing but sending them on 7 year mission to find their way back to being perennial a 5 loss team.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29177 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 11:25 am to
No. A school like Ole Miss would have been well served finding a QB guy like Cutcliffe, getting a freshman in there, and building towards his senior season.
Posted by Quicksilver
Poker Room
Member since Jan 2013
10744 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 12:00 pm to
I think we fired Orgeron a year too soon. The big rumor was that Ole Miss was going to the spread. Can't help but think we were going to install Freeze's offense, with Jevan Snead at quarterback.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32176 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

I think we fired Orgeron a year too soon. The big rumor was that Ole Miss was going to the spread. Can't help but think we were going to install Freeze's offense, with Jevan Snead at quarterback
It was more about getting Nutt than getting rid of Orgeron. One of your big money guys knew that Nutt could be had and arranged the whole deal. Had Nutt not been available at the time, I think Orgeron would have gotten at least one more year. Things did not work out so well for your big money guy either as he got indicted while all of this taking place.
Posted by inelishaitrust
Oxford, MS
Member since Jan 2008
26078 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 1:05 pm to
No. But I like where we are now, and we'd have never gotten Freeze if not for Orgeron.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
10277 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 1:11 pm to
We should have fired Boone and kept Cutcliffe.

The two disasters that followed almost ruined the program.
This post was edited on 8/3/15 at 1:12 pm
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19104 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Did TN make the right call by not hiring him a few years later??


As you well know, UT hired him as OC in '06 and he left after the '07 season to coach at Duke. UT approached him about the job and he wasn't interested (too much pressure).
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10556 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 1:45 pm to
Keeping Cut would have been misery. We knew Bama wasn't going to keep Shula forever.
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
14091 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 2:27 pm to
It was a bad move. That's pretty much universally known. But, had he not been fired, it's highly unlikely he'd been there much longer anyway.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42604 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 3:27 pm to
I'm a huge Cutcliffe fan but at that time Coach Cut was a fantastic OC still trying to figure out how to be a good HC. He had a lot of it together at OM but he was still learning on the job too and OM is a difficult place to have to learn on the job. It really wasn't until Duke that he started to his prime as an Head Coach.
Posted by rebsfan10
Member since Dec 2013
1563 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 3:32 pm to
Cutcliffe is a great guy, but he did not want to recruit. He was successful because he had Eli at QB. People don't realize how much he underachieved before we got Eli. I have no doubt that had Tuberville stayed, we would have made an SEC championship with Romero Miller and Deuce. But the bottom line is, if you are going to be successful in the SEC, you have to recruit at an elite level.
Posted by BRTiger2005
Member since May 2005
1270 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 3:36 pm to
Yes, but they probably should've had a better plan heading into it.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26483 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

OM is a difficult place to have to learn on the job.


Truth.

This makes Freeze's accomplishments, thus far, all the more impressive, especially considering the Mongolian clusterfrick he inherited in the wake of Houston Dale Nutt's two-win swan song.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 8/3/15 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Keeping Cut would have been misery. We knew Bama wasn't going to keep Shula forever.


Shula faced Cut twice and was 1-1.

Overall, Cut was 2-4 against Bama. That's the exact same winning percentage Freezus currently has against Bama and better than Johnny Vaught's career record of 2-5.

Edited to add: The only coach in the history of Alabama football that's lost more than 1 game to Ole Miss is Bear Bryant & Cut is the only coach to date other than Vaught to beat Bama more than once during his entire career at Ole Miss. If you fired him based on performance against Bama, you made an extraordinarily bad call.
This post was edited on 8/3/15 at 3:54 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter