Started By
Message
re: Colin Cowherd Oklahoma to the SEC eventually
Posted on 6/30/15 at 10:38 pm to nebraskafaninwi
Posted on 6/30/15 at 10:38 pm to nebraskafaninwi
quote:
The mere fact that idiots don't know Oklahoma already rejected the SEC show show little people around here know.
You're a special kind of stupid.
0
Posted on 6/30/15 at 10:38 pm to Tiger Live2
quote:
UVA DID NOT want VA Tech in the ACC
maybe, but doesn't mean either will leave for SEC.
I know UNC-UVA-Duke-Wake-Gtech are always going to stay together. Probably throw in NC State with that.
ACC has the potential to be biggest money conference if the teams in it will just stay put.
ACC has the largest populated state footprint of any conference.
This post was edited on 6/30/15 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 6/30/15 at 10:54 pm to AU24
Colin Cowherd ; dr
Seriously. Cow Turd is the biggest idiot in all of sports commentary. Baseless, bullshittary. frick Cow Turd. fricking commie left coast arse wipe.
and frickLSU® for good measure.
Seriously. Cow Turd is the biggest idiot in all of sports commentary. Baseless, bullshittary. frick Cow Turd. fricking commie left coast arse wipe.
and frickLSU® for good measure.
Posted on 6/30/15 at 11:00 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
and frickLSU® for good measure.
Glad you put this part. Otherwise I would of had to agree with every word you said.
Posted on 6/30/15 at 11:15 pm to nebraskafaninwi
quote:
Oklahoma said no to the SEC during the last round of conference expansion. Oklahoma's president wants AAU status. That is well known by people in the academic world and he has been working towards it. He wants the B1G so he can continue to get AAU status. He isn't getting AAU status with a move to the SEC.
There are SEC schools I'm sure could go AAU before OU. OU is not the academic powerhouse you're trying to convince us it is..
Posted on 6/30/15 at 11:19 pm to Jamie Lannister
Posted on 6/30/15 at 11:27 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
RAd
quote:
aTm fan
Shocker...
Posted on 6/30/15 at 11:34 pm to KaiserSoze99
Somewhere right now Texas fans are laughing. 
Posted on 6/30/15 at 11:43 pm to Fratigerguy
If and when the SEC goes to 16 teams, football premium brands should be the key deciding factor (Texas, Oklahoma, Clemson, Florida State). Here is a case for adding Texas and OU.
***SEC Pods w/ permenant opponent from each pod.
1. Texas – Texas A&M – Vandy – South Carolina
2. Oklahoma – MSU – Auburn - Georgia
3. Arkansas – LSU – Alabama - Kentucky
4. Missouri – Ole Miss – Tennessee - Florida
1. LSU – Arkansas – Alabama - Kentucky
2. Texas A&M – Texas – Vandy – South Carolina
3. Ole Miss – Missouri – Tennessee - Florida
4. Mississippi State – Oklahoma – Auburn - Georgia
1. Alabama – Arkansas – LSU - Kentucky
2. Auburn – Oklahoma – MSU - Georgia
3. Tennessee – Missouri – Ole Miss - Florida
4. Vanderbilt – Texas – Texas A&M – South Carolina
1. Florida – Missouri – Ole Miss – Tennessee
2. Georgia – Oklahoma – MSU - Auburn
3. South Carolina – Texas – Texas A&M - Vandy
4. Kentucky – Arkansas – LSU - Alabama
Pods can be set-up to continue traditional match-ups.
***SEC Pods w/ permenant opponent from each pod.
1. Texas – Texas A&M – Vandy – South Carolina
2. Oklahoma – MSU – Auburn - Georgia
3. Arkansas – LSU – Alabama - Kentucky
4. Missouri – Ole Miss – Tennessee - Florida
1. LSU – Arkansas – Alabama - Kentucky
2. Texas A&M – Texas – Vandy – South Carolina
3. Ole Miss – Missouri – Tennessee - Florida
4. Mississippi State – Oklahoma – Auburn - Georgia
1. Alabama – Arkansas – LSU - Kentucky
2. Auburn – Oklahoma – MSU - Georgia
3. Tennessee – Missouri – Ole Miss - Florida
4. Vanderbilt – Texas – Texas A&M – South Carolina
1. Florida – Missouri – Ole Miss – Tennessee
2. Georgia – Oklahoma – MSU - Auburn
3. South Carolina – Texas – Texas A&M - Vandy
4. Kentucky – Arkansas – LSU - Alabama
Pods can be set-up to continue traditional match-ups.
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:03 am to G&P
1. Texas A&M – Auburn - Virginia Tech – South Carolina
2. Oklahoma – MSU – Alabama - Georgia
3. Arkansas – LSU – Tennessee - Kentucky
4. Missouri – Ole Miss – Vanderbilt - Florida
1. LSU – Arkansas – VT - Florida
2. Auburn – A&M – Alabama – Georgia
3. Ole Miss – Missouri – Tennessee - SC
4. Mississippi State – Oklahoma - Vandy – Kentucky
1. Virginia Tech – A&M – LSU - Kentucky
2. Alabama – Oklahoma – Auburn - Georgia
3. Tennessee – Arkansas – Ole Miss - Florida
4. Vanderbilt – Missouri - Miss St – South Carolina
1. Florida – Missouri – LSU – Tennessee
2. Georgia – Oklahoma – MSU - Auburn
3. South Carolina - Texas A&M - Ole Miss - Vandy
4. Kentucky – Arkansas – Miss St - Alabama
2. Oklahoma – MSU – Alabama - Georgia
3. Arkansas – LSU – Tennessee - Kentucky
4. Missouri – Ole Miss – Vanderbilt - Florida
1. LSU – Arkansas – VT - Florida
2. Auburn – A&M – Alabama – Georgia
3. Ole Miss – Missouri – Tennessee - SC
4. Mississippi State – Oklahoma - Vandy – Kentucky
1. Virginia Tech – A&M – LSU - Kentucky
2. Alabama – Oklahoma – Auburn - Georgia
3. Tennessee – Arkansas – Ole Miss - Florida
4. Vanderbilt – Missouri - Miss St – South Carolina
1. Florida – Missouri – LSU – Tennessee
2. Georgia – Oklahoma – MSU - Auburn
3. South Carolina - Texas A&M - Ole Miss - Vandy
4. Kentucky – Arkansas – Miss St - Alabama
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:06 am to AU24
OH NO
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:16 am to Ericvol2096
Not bad Eric.
LSU vs. Texas A&M is huge for both fan bases. It's a keeper.
LSU vs. Texas A&M is huge for both fan bases. It's a keeper.
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:17 am to Jamie Lannister
quote:
ACC has the potential to be biggest money conference if the teams in it will just stay put.
ACC has the largest populated state footprint of any conference.
No, they don't have that potential. Your footprint doesn't matter, as you already sold all of your rights to ESPN. The Big 10 and the SEC kept some of their rights to use in a network, but if there is ever a ACC network ESPN has already paid for almost all the content it needs for a long time. By the time that contract expires footprint and conference networks might not matter anymore.
Back in realignment the ACC basically signed away everything- its Tier 3 content (and therefore future ACC Network money), its conference rules (ND as half member), its academic snobbery (when it picked UL over UCONN)-to survive. There are no major additional potential revenue sources to tap, your conference will fall far behind the SEC and Big 10 with certainty. The consolation is that the ACC will stay close to the PAC or Big 12 in money.
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:22 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Back in realignment the ACC basically signed away everything- its Tier 3 content (and therefore future ACC Network money), its conference rules (ND as half member), its academic snobbery (when it picked UL over UCONN)-to survive. There are no major additional potential revenue sources to tap, your conference will fall far behind the SEC and Big 10 with certainty. The consolation is that the ACC will stay close to the PAC or Big 12 in money.
Not exactly sure the details on that...but all the more reason ESPN will make sure the ACC doesn't get poached. So much invested in its survival. They especially won't risk their entire investment failing for the chance at a little more money for another investment.
There are a few teams that the ACC can lose without too much of a fight. (Va Tech, maybe NC State), but outside that, you are all just dreaming.
The future of expansion is West.
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:25 am to G&P
I wasn't sure if you'd want that over Arkansas.
Don't see a way to keep both.
Which is bigger to LSU?
Don't see a way to keep both.
Which is bigger to LSU?
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:41 am to nebraskafaninwi
quote:
Oklahoma heading to the B1G would be amazing, since you can have games.... Oklahoma vs Nebraska - bring back the rivalry. Oklahoma vs Michigan Oklahoma vs Ohio State Oklahoma vs Penn State
Because......
Oklahoma vs. Alabama
Oklahoma vs. Auburn
Oklahoma vs. LSU
Oklahoma vs. Texas A&M - bring back a rivalry
Oklahoma vs. Mizzou - bring back another rivalry
Oklahoma vs. Arkansas
would all suck.
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:45 am to tylerdurden24
quote:
frick them. And frick Mizzou.
That way you can start playing in the SEC title game again?
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:48 am to 5thTiger
quote:
Not exactly sure the details on that...but all the more reason ESPN will make sure the ACC doesn't get poached. So much invested in its survival. They especially won't risk their entire investment failing for the chance at a little more money for another investment.
I pretty much agree with you, especially now that ESPN (via the ACC) finally has its claws into some Notre Dame games. Basically the last contract ESPN gave the ACC what it took for each team to make $20 million a year because that was perceived nationally (thanks to the PAC) as the point of stability. If the ACC is seen as unstable again in the future I could see them starting a network with the content they already have and paying a token amount more to keep them happy.
Still the point remains the ACC sold its shirt to stay stable last time, and there isn't some huge pool of content left for them to monetize. They will fall behind the SEC.
We could see a defection or two without the ACC crumbling (like when the B1G took Maryland).
This post was edited on 7/1/15 at 9:49 am
Posted on 7/1/15 at 10:00 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Kick LSU out and replace them with the fricking longhorns. Seriously, LSU is a shitty, POS school, whereas, while the fricking longhorns are conference-destroying arse wipes, at least they aren't poor, bankrupt, and stupid as frick, like LSU, right?
You sound mad jealous
Posted on 7/1/15 at 10:03 am to Mizzou to my Lou
quote:
That way you can start playing in the SEC title game again?
lol there's a huge difference between getting to the sec title game and winning it.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News