Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/30/16 at 2:26 am to UFMatt
Under Bama rules (where you can win the title despite losing the bowl to the team that you finish ahead of) we should get a split title for 1995.
Posted on 7/30/16 at 6:37 am to lilaznfish123
quote:
Auburn committed a bunch of violations in 2010 such as changing players' grades, so according to your logic, Michael Dyer should not have been playing for the 2010 game
That's a new one. Link?
Posted on 7/30/16 at 1:00 pm to MrMojoRisin
4 for LSU, not 2
This post was edited on 7/30/16 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 7/30/16 at 1:26 pm to BowlJackson
quote:
Pretty simple really: Jameis should've been in jail that night for rape. Kind of ironic without a rapist on the field, Auburn would've raped FSU. Also, it's just a matter of time before some Reggie Bush shite is exposed and they have to forfeit.
Auburn University, your 2013 Could've, Would've, Should've National Champions!
Posted on 7/30/16 at 1:36 pm to montanagator
quote:
Under Bama rules (where you can win the title despite losing the bowl to the team that you finish ahead of) we should get a split title for 1995.
This is a disturbing lack of understanding of reality. In the years you are referring to, Bama won the AP and/or UPI titles, the only ones that mattered at the time. Period. Does any instance exist in which a school does NOT claim titles awarded by one of these two organizations? It's totally fine if you don't respect those titles, but that doesn't change the fact that they happened. At any rate, a system was in place at the time, yet Florida didn't win shite in 1995 besides the SEC. You are comparing apples to spaceships.
Posted on 7/30/16 at 1:51 pm to AlabamaAlum07
quote:
I assume he's talking about this.
LINK
I assume that as well, hence my comment. Because some website shows a bunch of non-consequential titles on it, hardly can be translated to "OU can claim". That's massively ignorant. Oklahoma cannot claim a bunch of those because nobody cares about them.
This post was edited on 7/30/16 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 7/30/16 at 2:02 pm to Weagle25
quote:
Also getting jobbed in '83
We should claim absolutely. Miami getting the crown is the definition of mythical and arbitrary national champions. we played and beat something like 9 ranked teams that season.
Posted on 7/30/16 at 2:40 pm to montanagator
quote:
Under Bama rules (where you can win the title despite losing the bowl to the team that you finish ahead of) we should get a split title for 1995.
Why am I not surprised that a UF fan has no idea what he's talking about when it comes to CFB history?
Posted on 7/30/16 at 2:57 pm to boxedlunch
quote:
I assume that as well, hence my comment. Because some website shows a bunch of non-consequential titles on it, hardly can be translated to "OU can claim". That's massively ignorant. Oklahoma cannot claim a bunch of those because nobody cares about them.
A lot of those supposed selectors on there aren't even in the NCAA records book either.
Posted on 7/30/16 at 3:03 pm to thatthang
quote:
uburn University, your 2013 Could've, Would've, Should've National Champions
Like Bear Bryant himself said "We'll accept any National Championship awarded to us, even if it was by a laundromat in Tuscaloosa."
So I'll take it
Posted on 7/30/16 at 3:04 pm to BowlJackson
Damn right.
Posted on 7/30/16 at 3:36 pm to AlabamaAlum07
quote:
A lot of those supposed selectors on there aren't even in the NCAA records book either.
Which basically makes them irrelevant, outside of an "hey that's interesting" sort of way. Nobody claims them. Nobody really cares about them.
Some of the origins of those are rather funny when you consider people think winning team means their team "can claim them".
Posted on 7/30/16 at 3:38 pm to Rhymenoceros
quote:
We should claim absolutely. Miami getting the crown is the definition of mythical and arbitrary national champions. we played and beat something like 9 ranked teams that season.
You mean something like 6.
Posted on 7/30/16 at 3:40 pm to boxedlunch
quote:
Which basically makes them irrelevant, outside of an "hey that's interesting" sort of way. Nobody claims them. Nobody really cares about them.
Some of the origins of those are rather funny when you consider people think winning team means their team "can claim them".
One of them is called the ARGH Rankings. I imagine a bunch of pirates sitting around a table.
Posted on 7/30/16 at 3:44 pm to boxedlunch
quote:
You mean something like 6.
I'll actually support the Barners for once...they played 4 teams who finished ranked in the top 10 (plus we finished #15) while Miami only played 2. They should've at least gotten a share of the title.
Posted on 7/30/16 at 4:04 pm to AlabamaAlum07
quote:
I'll actually support the Barners for once...they played 4 teams who finished ranked in the top 10 (plus we finished #15) while Miami only played 2. They should've at least gotten a share of the title.
I'll support them too, they should have one. However, they beat 6 ranked teams, no more.
Posted on 7/30/16 at 5:43 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
2007: Mizzou went 12-2
Lol frick no
Posted on 7/30/16 at 5:46 pm to KCM0Tiger
1909 baby!!
Posted on 7/30/16 at 5:56 pm to boxedlunch
quote:
You mean something like 6.
Ok. Not too mention our only loss was to #3 Texas, and we beat #5 Florida who routed Miami. Still pisses me off today
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News