Started By
Message
re: Case Closed: We can all agree that Mizzou and A&M were homerun additions
Posted on 7/7/15 at 3:50 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 7/7/15 at 3:50 pm to mizzoukills
A topic worthy of "Case Closed" status would be frickLSU®. We can all agree on that.
0
Posted on 7/7/15 at 3:54 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Case Closed: We can all agree that Mizzou and A&M were homerun additions
I don't know much about Mizzou but A&M has been a guaranteed win on the schedule every year.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 4:00 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
Missouri has been fine. I'd be ok with swapping Texas A&M with another Big 12 team though.
Exactly. Would rather swap TAMU for Texas or TCU. TAMU is too freaking weird and the culture does not fit the SEC at all. Not sure what conference they do fit
Posted on 7/7/15 at 4:02 pm to constant cough
quote:
I don't know much about Mizzou but A&M has been a guaranteed win on the schedule every year.
Obviously not since y'all quit on them before.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 4:03 pm to StopRobot
TAMU would say that you all don't fit their conference, because TAMU now owns this conference.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 4:54 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
Biggest mistake since granting Arkansas statehood.
that mudhole between Mizzou and La is a state?
who says?
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:04 pm to Jagd Tiger
Isn't that area between MO and LA where our piss and poo ends up? Seriously?
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:22 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
It's pretty common knowledge that the entire basketball landscape what experiencing a sporting "dark ages" at that time. That Arkansas team wouldn't have won the conference let alone made the tournament in any normal year.
Basketball in general had not recovered by 1995 when Arkansas represented almost as well, making it to the finals.
That year is often referred to as "the stone age" in basketball circles.
Arkansas needs a stone age in football.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:25 pm to mizzoukills
I think Texas would've been the better choice.
Stick with primary flagship state schools.
Next wave should be Virginia and North Carolina.
Schools like A&M are like Virginia Tech to me.
Stick with primary flagship state schools.
Next wave should be Virginia and North Carolina.
Schools like A&M are like Virginia Tech to me.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:29 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
Basketball in general had not recovered by 1995 when Arkansas represented almost as well, making it to the finals.
That year is often referred to as "the stone age" in basketball circles.
Arkansas needs a stone age in football
quote:
PygmalionEffect
Eta: Sorry, I had to...
He was making a joke by comparing the Arkansas basketball situation to what many on here say about Mizzouri's two east football titles.
This post was edited on 7/7/15 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:38 pm to GeauxToBed
quote:
He was making a joke by comparing the Arkansas basketball situation to what many on here say about Mizzouri's two east football titles.
He was?
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:41 pm to GeauxToBed
Is winning the division really a "title?" I mean there's no trophy or anything. They could hang a banner I guess.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:54 pm to mizzoukills
As much as I don't want to admit it, I will. They were damn good additions. From a marketing prospective, and the large amount of people moving to Houston, A&M was a great additions.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 6:06 pm to StopRobot
quote:
Exactly. Would rather swap TAMU for Texas or TCU. TAMU is too freaking weird and the culture does not fit the SEC at all. Not sure what conference they do fit
I agree. Nothing fits the SEC better than small private religious schools and leftist west-coast style urban universities.
SEC cawabunga, braaa!!!
Posted on 7/7/15 at 6:08 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I think Texas would've been the better choice.
Stick with primary flagship state schools.
I agree. Kick LSU out for the UL Rajin Cajins.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 6:19 pm to StopRobot
quote:
Exactly. Would rather swap TAMU for Texas or TCU. TAMU is too freaking weird and the culture does not fit the SEC at all. Not sure what conference they do fit
I call BS. Tejas would be the absolute worst partner. That is unless you want to see the SEC implode. TCU...well nice troll.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 6:20 pm to Sleeping Tiger
The school you call Texas "flagship" has less students and a smaller stadium then the Texas Aggies.
The Texas Aggies sold 102,500 season tickets this year and the fagship sold 45,000.
Now if your criteria is irrelevant leather helmet football than the flagship is in Austin.
The Texas Aggies sold 102,500 season tickets this year and the fagship sold 45,000.
Now if your criteria is irrelevant leather helmet football than the flagship is in Austin.
Posted on 7/7/15 at 6:22 pm to mizzoukills
I like the TAMU addition. I'm just worried that adding Missouri has made the SEC-W teams get complacent in the SECCG. We need our champions to be peaking in the post-season.
Page 13 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News