Started By
Message
Blue-Chip Ratio
Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:34 pm
THE 2017 BLUE-CHIP RATIO: YOUR COLLEGE FOOTBALL CHAMP WILL BE ONE OF THESE 10 TEAMS
by Bud Elliott
I have a pretty good idea who will win the national championship this season. The list of true contenders is short.
It’s not based on my opinion, but rather a simple stat I’ve been tracking for a few years: the Blue-Chip Ratio, which shows what percentage of a team’s signees are rated four- or five-stars ("blue chips") as recruits.
It boils down to teams that sign more four- and five-star recruits than two- and three-stars, over the previous four recruiting classes. That’s an exclusive club, usually consisting of the top 10 percent of FBS programs. All of the national champs over the last decade-plus have accomplished it, and often, the team taking home the trophy has signed many more elite players.
Clemson took home the title in 2016 after signing 52 percent blue chips in the 2013-16 classes. In 2015, it was Alabama with a 77 percent mark. In 2014, it was Ohio State at 68 percent. In 2013, it was Florida State at 53. And on and on.
As my colleague Bill Connelly has said, winning in college football takes talent acquisition, development, and deployment. I agree. But Gene Chizik has a national title, while Mark Dantonio and Gary Patterson do not; acquisition is by far the most important element. By NCAA rule, coaches get just 20 hours per week with their players. Only so much development can be done.
(It’s worth it to add a disclaimer. This metric is quite useful for determining which teams have signed elite talent. It is not the most useful for differentiating between bad and below average teams, or below average and average; some teams simply do not have much of a shot of signing elite prospects and instead try to find diamonds in the rough. That’s a strategy that can produce wins, though perhaps not rings.)
THIS YEAR, IN ORDER, IT IS ALABAMA, OHIO STATE, LSU, FLORIDA STATE, GEORGIA, USC, MICHIGAN, AUBURN, CLEMSON, AND NOTRE DAME.
THESE TEAMS MADE THE BLUE-CHIP RATIO CUT
Team Blue-Chip Ratio
Alabama 80%
Ohio State 71%
LSU 65%
Florida State 65%
Georgia 63%
USC 63%
Michigan 61%
Auburn 59%
Clemson 56%
Notre Dame 56%
That’s it. Ten teams. There are no real surprises; it’s all bluebloods. This year features the lowest number of teams meeting the 50 percent threshold since I began tracking. Usually there are two or three more.
LINK
by Bud Elliott
I have a pretty good idea who will win the national championship this season. The list of true contenders is short.
It’s not based on my opinion, but rather a simple stat I’ve been tracking for a few years: the Blue-Chip Ratio, which shows what percentage of a team’s signees are rated four- or five-stars ("blue chips") as recruits.
It boils down to teams that sign more four- and five-star recruits than two- and three-stars, over the previous four recruiting classes. That’s an exclusive club, usually consisting of the top 10 percent of FBS programs. All of the national champs over the last decade-plus have accomplished it, and often, the team taking home the trophy has signed many more elite players.
Clemson took home the title in 2016 after signing 52 percent blue chips in the 2013-16 classes. In 2015, it was Alabama with a 77 percent mark. In 2014, it was Ohio State at 68 percent. In 2013, it was Florida State at 53. And on and on.
As my colleague Bill Connelly has said, winning in college football takes talent acquisition, development, and deployment. I agree. But Gene Chizik has a national title, while Mark Dantonio and Gary Patterson do not; acquisition is by far the most important element. By NCAA rule, coaches get just 20 hours per week with their players. Only so much development can be done.
(It’s worth it to add a disclaimer. This metric is quite useful for determining which teams have signed elite talent. It is not the most useful for differentiating between bad and below average teams, or below average and average; some teams simply do not have much of a shot of signing elite prospects and instead try to find diamonds in the rough. That’s a strategy that can produce wins, though perhaps not rings.)
THIS YEAR, IN ORDER, IT IS ALABAMA, OHIO STATE, LSU, FLORIDA STATE, GEORGIA, USC, MICHIGAN, AUBURN, CLEMSON, AND NOTRE DAME.
THESE TEAMS MADE THE BLUE-CHIP RATIO CUT
Team Blue-Chip Ratio
Alabama 80%
Ohio State 71%
LSU 65%
Florida State 65%
Georgia 63%
USC 63%
Michigan 61%
Auburn 59%
Clemson 56%
Notre Dame 56%
That’s it. Ten teams. There are no real surprises; it’s all bluebloods. This year features the lowest number of teams meeting the 50 percent threshold since I began tracking. Usually there are two or three more.
LINK
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:42 pm to ALA2262
Well no shite! So what youre saying is the more 4 and 5 star players your team recruits it enhances your chances for a MNC?
Well damn who woulda thunk it
Well damn who woulda thunk it
Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:46 pm to kbrake37
I am not Bud Elliot, but yeah, that is what he is saying.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 7:57 pm to ALA2262
No A&M? Huh. How about that??
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:07 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Alabama at 80% and they still cant just walk away with the title every year
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:16 pm to kbrake37
Football is more complicated than the blue-chip ratio dude
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:26 pm to RebelTheBear
quote:
Football is more complicated than the blue-chip ratio dude
While true, complications mostly involve sorting out those with blue-chip talent.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:37 pm to ALA2262
quote:
Alabama 80%
LSU 65%
Georgia 63%
Auburn 59%
Clemson 56%
Auburn plays four of these teams.. two at the valleys and two at home. Going to have to earn it, with some help from some divine intervention.
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 8:38 pm
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:42 pm to ALA2262
quote:
Georgia 63% USC 63%
quote:
Michigan 61% Notre Dame 56%
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:49 pm to ALA2262
Wow,if only this information was posted earlier.
Thanks Dr Scoop!
Thanks Dr Scoop!
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:17 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Your first thought is about A&M? Weird
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:32 pm to ALA2262
It's a good thing I can read German for this thread.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:32 pm to ALA2262
Another stupid talent metric. If you want to measure the number of former "blue chip" recruits, then just count them from the 247 roster lists, using some straightforward criteria for what equals a "blue chip". You don't need a ratio, don't need to look at the two deep, or know how many were signed 4 years ago. A simple head count is probably as good or better than any other measure, and less prone to manipulation.
It took me about 3 minutes to determine that UGA has 56 former 4 or 5 star recruits on roster. Can't imagine how his ratio statistic adds any information beyond the raw number.
It took me about 3 minutes to determine that UGA has 56 former 4 or 5 star recruits on roster. Can't imagine how his ratio statistic adds any information beyond the raw number.
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:23 am to ALA2262
quote:
Alabama 80%
no surprise here....
but, How come these teams
quote:
Auburn 59% Clemson 56%
give bama more trouble than
quote:
LSU 65%
Posted on 8/23/17 at 9:59 am to Mr.Sinister
Good God, being a Georgia fan has to be miserable.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News