Started By
Message
Blind Résumé Comparison
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:39 pm
To the distinguished and discerning college football aficionados, I would like to draw your attention to an interesting thought experiment.
Below is a blind résumé comparison between two similar teams in similar situations. Since, according to many on this board, football started very very recently, so we shall confine this case study to the 2014 season. Please evaluate the teams' 2014 season, and provide projections or insights into the 2015 season, if possible. They are in the same region of the country, to factor in recruiting.
Please note, this thread is entirely voluntary. No one is being coerced into participating in this purely academic debate among scholars.
Résumé 1
Overall Record: 9-4
Coach: 7th year
OC: 3rd year
DC: 3rd year
Regular season record vs top 10 teams: 0-1
Regular season record vs top 25 teams: 0-2
Final standing in conference: 5th
Gave vs. conference champ: DNP
Game vs. runner up: L
Game vs. 3rd place: L
Game vs. 4th place: L
Lost bowl game
Résumé 2
Overall Record: 11-3
Coach: 14th year
OC: 2nd year
DC: 6th year
Regular season record vs top 10 teams: 0-1
Regular season record vs top 25 teams: 1-2
Final standing in conference: 4th
Gave vs. conference champ: L
Game vs. runner up: L
Game vs. 3rd place: L
Game vs. 4th place: DNP
Won bowl game
Feel free to comment on any similarities or differences between the resumes. I think they are fairly comparable TBH. Not much was accomplished by either team, and the future looks about the same for both programs.
Below is a blind résumé comparison between two similar teams in similar situations. Since, according to many on this board, football started very very recently, so we shall confine this case study to the 2014 season. Please evaluate the teams' 2014 season, and provide projections or insights into the 2015 season, if possible. They are in the same region of the country, to factor in recruiting.
Please note, this thread is entirely voluntary. No one is being coerced into participating in this purely academic debate among scholars.
Résumé 1
Overall Record: 9-4
Coach: 7th year
OC: 3rd year
DC: 3rd year
Regular season record vs top 10 teams: 0-1
Regular season record vs top 25 teams: 0-2
Final standing in conference: 5th
Gave vs. conference champ: DNP
Game vs. runner up: L
Game vs. 3rd place: L
Game vs. 4th place: L
Lost bowl game
Résumé 2
Overall Record: 11-3
Coach: 14th year
OC: 2nd year
DC: 6th year
Regular season record vs top 10 teams: 0-1
Regular season record vs top 25 teams: 1-2
Final standing in conference: 4th
Gave vs. conference champ: L
Game vs. runner up: L
Game vs. 3rd place: L
Game vs. 4th place: DNP
Won bowl game
Feel free to comment on any similarities or differences between the resumes. I think they are fairly comparable TBH. Not much was accomplished by either team, and the future looks about the same for both programs.
8
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:40 pm to Porker Face
Bert ate both Resumes
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:41 pm to Porker Face
Arky fan
DR
Porker Thread
DV
DR
Porker Thread
DV
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:45 pm to the808bass
quote:
Arky fan
DR
Porker Thread
DV
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
the808bass
maybe a little more accurately:
quote:
Arky fan
must click
Porker Thread
must post
:bertsessed:
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
Arky fan DR Porker Thread DV
But he still got you to click on the thread and make a post. Well thought out response on your part.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:52 pm to Porker Face
Team with 10 regular season wins, conference championship appearance, and bowl win > team with 9 regular season wins and bowl loss.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 4:16 pm to chilge1
quote:
conference championship appearance
what are you looking at?
Posted on 7/19/15 at 4:27 pm to lefty08
I have no idea why people are adding things to my hypothetical situation
Posted on 7/19/15 at 4:28 pm to lefty08
It only stands to reason that if team #2 played 14 games they played in CCG.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 4:55 pm to the808bass
quote:
Arky fan
DR
Porker Thread
DV
I dunno. I like Porker's unhealthy obsession with Missouri.
Maybe he saw me on TV. I was doing some late game field maintenance dressed in black.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 5:04 pm to Mizz-SEC
quote:
Missouri
???
This is a blind resume comparison. Please quit projecting your shitsquad onto my anonymous teams
Posted on 7/19/15 at 5:24 pm to Porker Face
Thank you for bringing interesting, thoughtful threads here once again
Posted on 7/19/15 at 5:30 pm to Porker Face
What is the point of this thread?
Posted on 7/19/15 at 5:31 pm to GeauxToBed
Had to have a hog fan start a thread so you would have somewhere to post
Posted on 7/19/15 at 5:31 pm to lefty08
That's not what I asked.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 5:31 pm to GeauxToBed
Just to discuss these teams and what they accomplished, if anything
Posted on 7/19/15 at 6:20 pm to Mizz-SEC
Damn Mizzou control yourself when you win the Super Bowl.
This post was edited on 7/19/15 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 7/19/15 at 6:52 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
Bert's resume means nothing. The Big 10 sucked through most of his successful years.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 8:16 pm to Porker Face
Pretty sad no one could even take a stab at the real life basis of the teams
Maybe the intellectuals aren't as bright as I thought
Maybe the intellectuals aren't as bright as I thought
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News