Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:18 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Bad? It isn't a 'bad' thing it just isn't a good win.
Tell us why? We dropped two TD passes and settled for a FG after their DB held our TE and kept him from scoring another.
You still insist on labeling teams based upon their past. 3 years ago Clemson had done nothing for a long, long time. last year they beat Alabama for the NC. In your world that was impossible.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:18 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
And what happened in that Game? It was literally over in the 1st Q. I would argue they didn't even deserve to be there.
They were 12-0 against a good schedule.
Do I think they were one of the two best teams? No, but they did what they needed to do to get to that point. No one else deserved it over them. They were undoubtedly relevant.
It still doesn't matter in 2017. None of their prior years' teams are playing their games this year.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:18 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Why does that matter? Why wouldn't you evaluate that win based on the body of evidence in this season?
Because any sane non delusional college football fan doesn't rate wins over Temple, Boston College, and Mich State? That is why. Lets not pretend that any of those wins mean anything.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:20 am to DawgsLife
quote:
Tell us why?
1 point win
Temple, Boston College, and Mich State
Any other questions?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:20 am to cas4t
quote:
And Francois was a true freshman last year. Those 3 losses were Louisville (Heisman winner), Clemson (eventual champs) and NC (pretty decent team).
Louisville was not very good, though. Look what LSU did to them. And we dominated NC last year with one of our worst teams in a long, long time.
You could be right, but we are still speculating about what FSU would be doing this year if they had Francois.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:21 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Because any sane non delusional college football fan doesn't rate wins over Temple, Boston College, and Mich State? That is why. Lets not pretend that any of those wins mean anything.
Why wouldn't a sane college football fan look at all available information when judging a team?
I'm not arguing to put them in the top five, but they've done everything you would reasonably expect from a top 20-25ish team, which is how they're rated currently.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:22 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
1 point win
And we could have had 18 more.
quote:
Temple, Boston College, and Mich State
Your point? The beat them all. Badly. You, nor I, for that matter, no exactly how good ND is this year.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:23 am to DawgsLife
quote:
but we are still speculating about what FSU would be doing this year if they had Francois.
yes we are having to speculate because Bama knocked the guy out for the season and took FSU's soul. It happens.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:24 am to DawgsLife
quote:
And we could have had 18 more.
But you didn't because.......
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:24 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Because any sane non delusional college football fan doesn't rate wins over Temple, Boston College, and Mich State?
And yet here you are saying they are no good based on nothing. They have looked good. They have beaten the teams they should have beaten and they have beaten them badly. That is what good teams do. maybe we should wait and see before labeling other teams.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:25 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
But you didn't because.......
Two dropped passes and a missed PI call.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:29 am to DawgsLife
I don't think Louisville was bad. Loss to Clemson, UK (bad loss) and Houston (Herman).
They weren't great but they weren't bad.
No doubt.
They weren't great but they weren't bad.
quote:
You could be right, but we are still speculating about what FSU would be doing this year if they had Francois.
No doubt.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:32 am to skrayper
Bert is big boy
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:32 am to cas4t
quote:
They weren't great but they weren't bad.
Bad was probably too strong a word. they were not very good, though. When they lost they were dominated, though.
Hope to see more of you on here!
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:33 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
But you didn't because.......
Probably the same reason Ole Miss beat Alabama two years in a row and Arkansas came within a point of beating them one of those years. Sometimes stuff happens?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:36 am to ChopBlockOclock
Auburn won a championship 6 years ago dipshite. Please enlighten us with more of your incredible opinions
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:42 am to Boomer00
And OU has only played an overrated Ohio State team. The fighting Urban Meyers are averaging 11 pts/game against their last 3 ranked teams they've played
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:52 am to skrayper
What a lie. There is nobody else at that table. Bama done cheated their way to nuking the conference. Nice job, Kim Jong Saban. Thanks for destroying football. ALL the other fans should boycott until Bama is on a long term bowl ban.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 11:06 am to TheJimBrown7
"And OU has only played an overrated Ohio State team. The fighting Urban Meyers are averaging 11 pts/game against their last 3 ranked teams they've played."
Keep winning and you might jump us. Your team and mine both have tough games on the horizon.
Keep winning and you might jump us. Your team and mine both have tough games on the horizon.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News