Started By
Message
Better passing attack in 2015: AU or UGA
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:13 pm
Let's hear it
ETA: in an attempt to prevent trolling, yes I guess I'm indirectly discussing slayton and Godwin but more from an angle of what offenses the teams will look like next year and what they are selling.
ETA: in an attempt to prevent trolling, yes I guess I'm indirectly discussing slayton and Godwin but more from an angle of what offenses the teams will look like next year and what they are selling.
This post was edited on 2/1/15 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:14 pm to Rhymenoceros
We have Chubb... You dont
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:16 pm to Rhymenoceros
We won't run it nearly as much next year plus we have a qb who can throw it deep this year unlike Mason last year. Still I'm not sure who actually does throw for more yards.
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:16 pm to Kneehigh
quote:
We have Chubb... You dont
Soooo Auburn? ?
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:18 pm to Rhymenoceros
Regardless, Georgia wins big over AU (again) next year.
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:19 pm to MenloDawg
quote:
This is an odd topic.
How so? Pretty sure it is a straight forward question. AU has been more recent a read option, pass off the run team, and UGA is a more proto typical NFL style and airs it out more. New UGA OC but AU going to a more conventional QB next year.
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:19 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:
This is an odd topic.
Agreed. What the frick?
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:20 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
We won't run it nearly as much next year plus we have a qb who can throw it deep this year unlike Mason last year. Still I'm not sure who actually does throw for more yards.
Thanks for actually responding, so you think y'all run less despite Chubb and new QB?
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:21 pm to TheJones
quote:
Agreed. What the frick?
Okay?
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:25 pm to Rhymenoceros
Historically, teams that run the ball as much as we did in 2014 do not run it nearly as much the following season. Of course our running game will be the strength of our O in 2015, but we will have a more explosive passing game than we did with Mason - it just won't be as consistent.
I would expect our passing attack will be ridiculous in a few years when Eason is slinging it around to Godwin and Slayton. Is that what you wanted to hear?
I would expect our passing attack will be ridiculous in a few years when Eason is slinging it around to Godwin and Slayton. Is that what you wanted to hear?
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:30 pm to Rhymenoceros
quote:
Thanks for actually responding, so you think y'all run less despite Chubb and new QB?
We ran it around 63% of the time last year which only 2 other teams in the SEC have done in the last 20 or so years and none repeated it so I think it's safe to say we'll throw it more next year. Plus, we're usually at about a 50/50 split between the run and pass.
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:33 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
We shall endeavor to do what we always try to do - have a balanced offense.
Given Ramsey will be a new QB for us and we will have one of the best stable of RBs in the country, I would not be too surprised if we are a bit run heavy next season.
A lot will depend on how well Ramsey protects the ball on pass plays, so ...
As for Auburn, I know nothing about your new QB and I'm not sure what you're bringing back on the OL or at RB. So, again ...
Given Ramsey will be a new QB for us and we will have one of the best stable of RBs in the country, I would not be too surprised if we are a bit run heavy next season.
A lot will depend on how well Ramsey protects the ball on pass plays, so ...
As for Auburn, I know nothing about your new QB and I'm not sure what you're bringing back on the OL or at RB. So, again ...
This post was edited on 2/1/15 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:35 pm to MenloDawg
quote:
This is an odd topic.
My guess it is based on the argument on other sites due to Godwin/Slayton recruiting battle.
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:35 pm to MenloDawg
quote:
I would expect our passing attack will be ridiculous in a few years when Eason is slinging it around to Godwin and Slayton. Is that what you wanted to hear
It was a catalyst for the conversation, sure, but don't know people can't answer in a legitimate fashion?
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:44 pm to GoldenDawg
Regardless, it will still lead to jack shite for UGA if they do win.:contractextension:
This post was edited on 2/1/15 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:56 pm to AUbagman
quote:
Regardless, it will still lead to jack shite for UGA if they do win.
34-7. Still burns, don't it.
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:59 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
My guess it is based on the argument on other sites due to Godwin/Slayton recruiting battle.
this... from the AU/UGA 247 boards.
Posted on 2/1/15 at 10:01 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:Not at all. After the TAMU game we mailed it in the rest of the season. On the other hand, you will never get over this
34-7. Still burns, don't it
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News