Started By
Message
re: Auburn has the best team in the SEC
Posted on 3/25/17 at 4:09 pm to CNB
Posted on 3/25/17 at 4:09 pm to CNB
says the guy who stalks me on here and seems to be unhinged
you one of these guys who is a nut about sports. you want to physically fight people over it, etc.
i don't see any reason u and i need to interact on here.
i mostly talk about football and SC doesn't do much in football.
anyway i'm going to stop responding to you because you are an attention ho.
you one of these guys who is a nut about sports. you want to physically fight people over it, etc.
i don't see any reason u and i need to interact on here.
i mostly talk about football and SC doesn't do much in football.
anyway i'm going to stop responding to you because you are an attention ho.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 4:12 pm
1
Posted on 3/25/17 at 4:10 pm to Tillman
quote:
you one of these guys who is a nut about sports.
You got me. Guilty.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 4:14 pm to CobraCommander83
quote:
Maybe so but ESPN and other media sources started to use the term.
the sports media also likes to talk about politics all the time. doesn't mean it makes sense.
Clemson wins more than most football programs. it doesnd't make sense to associate losing with Clemson.
only really bad losses to less talented teams that i can think of for Clemson was to Duke once with Bowden, and to Wake 1 time.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 4:29 pm to Tillman
quote:
until Pitt this past season, Clemson had beat like 35 unranked teams in a row.
What does this have to do about "Clemsoning"? Nothing.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 5:09 pm to jangalang
quote:
hat does this have to do about "Clemsoning"? Nothing.
i thought the point of CLemsoning was losing to bad teams despite having superior talent on your roster.
but in truth Clemsoning is used by people ike you even when Clemson loses to team that are ranked.
it is interesting that you pretend like CLemson has never been very good in fball, , while at the same time you appear to expect Clemson to win every game.
if CLemson is typically bad to mediocre in fball, then how could Clemson ever 'pull a Clemson' and lose to an inferior opponent.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 6:01 pm to Tillman
quote:
i thought the point of CLemsoning was losing to bad teams despite having superior talent on your roster.
Your ignorance is showing again.
quote:
interesting that you pretend like CLemson has never been very good in fball, , while at the same time you appear to expect Clemson to win every game.
Never said Clemson hasn't ever been good in football. It's your own tiresome faulty logic that creates these contradictions. Nobody has ever said Clemson is expected to win every game either. Even their overall record against Auburn says as much.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 6:07 pm to jangalang
majority of games against Auburn were pre 1970. not relevant to current state of football. consider that in the early years of football no black kids were on the teams. you didn't have innovative spread, hurry up offenses that passed a lot, etc.
20 of Auburn's wins came in 1942 or before, when basically no games were on television.
another 11 W's in the 1950's, 60s, and early 70s, still not heavilty televised.
you like to chant Clemsoning while at same time acting like Clemson historicaly hasn't been very good. it is a contradiction, an obvious one.
20 of Auburn's wins came in 1942 or before, when basically no games were on television.
another 11 W's in the 1950's, 60s, and early 70s, still not heavilty televised.
you like to chant Clemsoning while at same time acting like Clemson historicaly hasn't been very good. it is a contradiction, an obvious one.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 6:56 pm to Tillman
quote:
majority of games against Auburn were pre 1970. not relevant to current state of football. consider that in the early years of football no black kids were on the teams.
WtF do black kids have to do with anything? So you're saying the overall record isn't relevant and you think you're not a fool?
quote:
you like to chant Clemsoning while at same time acting like Clemson historicaly hasn't been very good. it is a contradiction, an obvious one.
Again, your faulty reasoning skills spoils your adequate understanding of the complete discussion.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 6:57 pm to jangalang
why do you spend so much time trying to beat up on Clemson? i'd be more interested in how AUburn could get better, if i was an AUburn fan. Clemson wouldn't be on my mind.
do you think most non-Auburn fans perceive Auburn as better program as Clemson.or care one way or another?
yes, i do think overall record is irrelevant for reasons that I've covered. CLemson was like the CItadel until 1955. it didn't become a university until 1965.
you are talking about overall record because you can't talk about modern times.
do you think most non-Auburn fans perceive Auburn as better program as Clemson.or care one way or another?
yes, i do think overall record is irrelevant for reasons that I've covered. CLemson was like the CItadel until 1955. it didn't become a university until 1965.
you are talking about overall record because you can't talk about modern times.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:00 pm to Tillman
quote:
AUburn
quote:Of course. What a dumb question
do you think most non-Auburn fans perceive Auburn as better program as Clemson.or care one way or another?
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:02 pm to ChexMix
quote:
Of course. What a dumb question
what's your source of that. you obviously an auburn superfan and the thing about both alabama and auburn fans, is you think peopel around the country make a poiont of watching your teams. it is like what everybody lives for. lol
auburn has been rather mediocrer thed last few years or so. it has the occsaional good year.
auburn got destroyed by an Olkla team in the bowl last year that Clemson destroyed in bowls the previous two years. but you act like your program is superior and people view it that way. who are these people and do they watch football.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:10 pm to Tillman
quote:We are a superior program in every way and everyone knows that.
but you act like your program is superior and people view it that way.
We created you.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:11 pm to ChexMix
quote:
e are a superior program in every way and everyone knows that.
We created you.
lol here we go.
i would have thought Auburn people would be the friendliest to Clemson fans on here, given i had always heard talk of them being 'sister schools', but actually in general Auburn fans are the most hostile or at least tied with the cocks, although the cocks on here didn't even attend SC and aren't like most SC grads.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:13 pm to Tillman
quote:Its not hostile to state facts. We created you. You're welcome
lol here we go.
i would have thought Auburn people would be the friendliest to Clemson fans on here, given i had always heard talk of them being 'sister schools', but actually in general Auburn fans are the most hostile or at least tied with the cocks.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:13 pm to ChexMix
quote:
not hostile to state facts. We created you. You're welcome
no we hired away coaches from Auburn and school presidents. they preferred to be at Clemson, and this was before the lake was built and Clemson had a Chipolte. lol
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 7:15 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:15 pm to Tillman
quote:whatever you have to tell yourself bud.
no we hired away coaches from Auburn and school presidents. they preferred to be at Clemson, and this was before the lake was built and Clemson had a Chipolte. lol
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:17 pm to ChexMix
wut will u say if Clemson wins 4 in a row against Auburn this year, and without Watson and the other NFL players that left?
it looks like if Auburn made Clemson, the student has become the master. lol
it looks like if Auburn made Clemson, the student has become the master. lol
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:19 pm to Tillman
quote:Probably the same thing when Auburn beats Clemson without Watson and the other NFL players that left both teams.
wut will u say if Clemson wins 4 in a row against Auburn this year, and without Watson and the other NFL players that left?
Good game
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:20 pm to ChexMix
will you remind us of how Auburn is a superior program yet again.
hope it all works out for you guys and you get a trophy for winning the all time series with Clemson.
hope it all works out for you guys and you get a trophy for winning the all time series with Clemson.
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 3/25/17 at 7:39 pm to Tillman
quote:
why do you spend so much time trying to beat up on Clemson? i'd be more interested in how AUburn could get better, if i was an AUburn fan. Clemson wouldn't be on my mind.
do you think most non-Auburn fans perceive Auburn as better program as Clemson.or care one way or another?
A clemson fan posting about Auburn in a thread about Auburn being the best in the SEC on a board specific to SEC fans...I have always wondered if you were a alter bama fan, but this might be the clearest proof.
I absolutely believe most people consider Auburn a better program in a 30 year or 20 year or even 10 year window of time...that said ya'lls last 5 years has been impressive. Dabo was close to being shown the door and ya'll stuck with him and it paid. I have zero doubt he'd been run out at Auburn under similar circumstance (multiple loses to rival/loosing games he shouldn't have lost) its our weakness. If Dabo can maintain a similar level post Watson it will stamp his mark on the history of CFB...if not he'll just be another coach that won big with lots of talent and a great QB. We've had a few of those through the years.
Page 10 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News