Started By
Message
Arkansas or Missouri?
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:10 pm
Who will be the better overall athletic program over the next 20 years?
12
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:11 pm to TeLeFaWx
Do we throw in track field?
If so, then Arkie.
If so, then Arkie.
This post was edited on 3/3/13 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:13 pm to TeLeFaWx
push
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:13 pm to TeLeFaWx
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:14 pm to TeLeFaWx
A&M.
That's what this thread is about right?
That's what this thread is about right?
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:15 pm to TeLeFaWx
Stick to perch jerkin'
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:17 pm to TeLeFaWx
Arkansas. Better facilities, booster support, etc.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:18 pm to bayou2003
quote:
Arkansas. Better facilities, booster support, etc
This, and it is not even close!
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:19 pm to WildcatMike
If you throw in wrestling. Mizzou.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:21 pm to reedus23
LO.L.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:23 pm to TeLeFaWx
Arkansas will be a little better in football and baseball. Missouri will be a little better in basketball. Arkansas is great in track, Missouri is great in something equally as irrelevant I'm sure.
Arkansas will be a bit better, IMO.
Arkansas will be a bit better, IMO.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:24 pm to Politiceaux
quote:
Missouri is great in something equally irrelevant
That would be Softball
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:25 pm to RIPZOU
quote:
That would be Softball
40 national titles?
This post was edited on 3/3/13 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:52 pm to TeLeFaWx
Something not being taken into consideration.
Missouri has better HS athletes and 2 major cities that are finally catching the youth football bug. Its a highly underrated recruiting area right now, and it's going to greatly improve.
Kids are growing up with a decent Mizzou program now, instead of a terrible one, will also make a difference.
Missouri has better HS athletes and 2 major cities that are finally catching the youth football bug. Its a highly underrated recruiting area right now, and it's going to greatly improve.
Kids are growing up with a decent Mizzou program now, instead of a terrible one, will also make a difference.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:54 pm to mograyback
That is like debating if the Lions or the Cardinals will be a better football team in 20 years. Both are year in and year out competing for the basement of the league
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:57 pm to GenesChin
Same question except Arkansas or aTm?
Posted on 3/3/13 at 9:58 pm to WonderWartHawg
aTm, without a question.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 10:01 pm to mograyback
quote:
Something not being taken into consideration.
Missouri has better HS athletes and 2 major cities that are finally catching the youth football bug. Its a highly underrated recruiting area right now, and it's going to greatly improve.
Kids are growing up with a decent Mizzou program now, instead of a terrible one, will also make a difference.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 10:02 pm to TeLeFaWx
Well 20 years ago Arky was "good". They suck now.
Missouri sucks now so I say in 20 years they'll be "good" while Arky will still suck.
Missouri sucks now so I say in 20 years they'll be "good" while Arky will still suck.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 10:14 pm to Politiceaux
quote:
Missouri will be a little better in basketball
Over the next 20 years? Unlikely.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News