Started By
Message
APR Scores for 2015-2016 released; SEC football scores inside
Posted on 5/10/17 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 1:52 pm
quote:
APR scores for 2015-2016 tell a familiar story in the SEC, with Vanderbilt football on top.
The NCAA released its Academic Progress Rate scores for the last full academic year on Wednesday. Among SEC football programs, the Commodores finished first with a 992 out of a possible 1,000.
Alabama, Auburn and Florida tied for second in the conference with a score of 980. Ten SEC teams finished with scores better than the national average for football (962).
Kentucky football came in last in the conference with an APR score of 958, which is still well above the score of 930 needed to avoid possible penalties. Penalties for failing to reach that benchmark can include reduced practice time and postseason bans.
Here’s how every team in the league ranked last year.
APR scores: SEC football (2015-2016)
1. Vanderbilt – 992
t-2. Alabama – 980
t-2. Auburn – 980
t-2. Florida – 980
t-5. Mississippi State – 974
t-5. Missouri – 974
7. Tennessee – 972
8. Ole Miss – 971
9. South Carolina – 970
10. Arkansas – 966
11. Texas A&M – 962
12. Georgia – 961
13. LSU – 959
14. Kentucky – 958
Here’s an explanation of how APR is calculated, from NCAA.org:
- Each student-athlete receiving athletically related financial aid earns one point for staying in school and one point for being academically eligible.
- A team’s total points are divided by points possible and then multiplied by 1,000 to equal the team’s Academic Progress Rate.
- In addition to a team’s current-year APR, its rolling four-year APR is also used to determine accountability.
Currently, teams must earn a 930 four-year average APR or a 940 average over the most recent two years to participate in NCAA championships. In 2015-16 and beyond, teams must earn a four-year APR of 930 to compete in championships.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 1:57 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
Lol @ Kentucky
First they have to share a magazine cover, now this.
Bad day for the Wildcats.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:01 pm to craigbiggio
This just proves how little UK actually cares about football. If 10 SEC schools are above the national average then the requirements can't be very stringent
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:03 pm to Vecchio Cane
When 2 schools from the state of Alabama are tied for second....
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:07 pm to Weagle25
quote:
When 2 schools from the state of Alabama are tied for second....
APR is a measure of attrition. It's not a measure of academic prestige or success but rather a measure of whether or not programs are retaining student athletes and making sure that those who do leave early leave in good standing and/or with the proper waivers.
What APR tells you more than anything is whether or not a program is in trouble internally and/or has had several coaching changes back to back to back. There's a correlation to good or high APR scores (retention) and success on the field.
APR does not take into account actual grades (a 4.0 is the same as a 1.85).
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:13 pm to TideSaint
FAT
POOR
AND STUPID
POOR
AND STUPID
quote:
14. Kentucky – 958
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:15 pm to Prof
quote:
APR is a measure of attrition. It's not a measure of academic prestige or success but rather a measure of whether or not programs are retaining student athletes and making sure that those who do leave early leave in good standing and/or with the proper waivers.
What APR tells you more than anything is whether or not a program is in trouble internally and/or has had several coaching changes back to back to back. There's a correlation to good or high APR scores (retention) and success on the field.
So Vanderbilt perennially being on top of this list is due to all their on-field success?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:18 pm to TideSaint
Football really bringing the overall apr of our AD down. We had 13 sports score 1000.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:32 pm to CrimsonCrusade
quote:
So Vanderbilt perennially being on top of this list is due to all their on-field success?
Come on, you know that's not the case. They're always at the top because no vandy players leave early, and no players perform so poorly in school , as to be academically ineligible.
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:32 pm to CrimsonCrusade
quote:
So Vanderbilt perennially being on top of this list is due to all their on-field success?
It's not that having a good APR = success. It's that there's a correlation between having a good APR and on field success. IOW, teams that do well on the field often have good APR scores and it's quite easy to understand why. Teams that suffer high attrition have far less depth and are often bereft of upperclassmen. However, correlation is not causation. Simply having a low or 'good' attrition rate isn't going to magically make you a successful program but it's sure as hell a lot harder to be successful if you have an attrition rate that destabilizes your program.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:53 pm to TigerTalker16
If you are going to troll at least do it with skill
Fat
Drunk
Stupid
Is no way to go through college
On a side note for being really good at making moonshine and bourbon it might explain why KY residents are below average on some other metrics.
Fat
Drunk
Stupid
Is no way to go through college
On a side note for being really good at making moonshine and bourbon it might explain why KY residents are below average on some other metrics.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:53 pm to TideSaint
quote:
1. Vanderbilt – 992
Buy the company that prints the shirts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 2:59 pm to TideSaint
quote:
APR scores: SEC football (2015-2016)
1. Vanderbilt – 992
t-2. Alabama – 980
t-2. Auburn – 980
t-2. Florida – 980
t-5. Mississippi State – 974
t-5. Missouri – 974
Big 5
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:11 pm to TideSaint
It's all those Ohio recruits. That's my story.
In all seriousness, transfers and attrition has killed their APR. As long as they're above the penalty point it is what it is.
Men's BB scored a 1000.
In all seriousness, transfers and attrition has killed their APR. As long as they're above the penalty point it is what it is.
Men's BB scored a 1000.
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:15 pm to TigerTalker16
quote:
TigerTalker16
"Fat, poor, and stupid" is good enough for a winning record and a winning streak against Mizzou apparently.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:25 pm to TigerTalker16
Kentucky also doesnt appear to like football all that much either.
LINK
quote:
Nothing was more disheartening than the attendance at Senior Day. Even though everyone knew it was going to be an easy win vs. Austin Peay, in previous years the stadium would’ve looked like an average crowd (with empty seats in the corners), excited to send the seniors off by becoming bowl eligible for the first time in six years. Instead, maybe 20,000 people were there. To the fans that didn’t miss a game, I applaud you and I thank you for supporting your football program. For those that stayed away from Commonwealth Stadium, it’s okay, there’s still time for redemption but you better act soon. You’re running out of excuses.
LINK
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:26 pm to TideSaint
For those interested, on a football team utilizing a full complement of 85 scholarships, I believe each person that's not academically qualified will dock your school ~6 APR points and each person that drops out (not sure how transfers work, but I believe you have to elligible to transfer) will dock your school almost 12 APR points.
The relative weight of each non-qualifier or drop-out would go up as the number of scholarship players goes down.
The relative weight of each non-qualifier or drop-out would go up as the number of scholarship players goes down.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:36 pm to kilo
quote:
Kentucky also doesnt appear to like football all that much either.
Pretty sure Mizzou was behind us in average attendance for 2016. You know, glass houses and all.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News