Started By
Message
Anyone interested in joining a college fantasy football league?
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:07 pm
We've currently got 9 openings in our 3rd satellite league. Winner of each satellite league gets an auto-invite to the main league.
If you have any questions, I'll answer them here. The website for the league can be found here: LINK
The league rules are as follows
If you have any questions, I'll answer them here. The website for the league can be found here: LINK
The league rules are as follows
This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:16 pm to joshnorris14
I'd be glad to Taco it up.
This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 6/4/17 at 12:28 pm to CCTider
Commish here - you can fill out the join form at www.cffleague.com and I can answer any questions you might have.
This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 6/4/17 at 1:09 pm to Porcine Human
If you submitted the form I responded to the email. Just FYI.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 3:06 pm to joshnorris14
College fantasy football is not nearly as good as NFL fantasy football.
Too many teams play too many crappy opponents.
One week, you're begging for the Michigan QB because they are playing Rutgers, and the next week you want the Oklahoma State QB because they are playing Kansas.
Too many teams play too many crappy opponents.
One week, you're begging for the Michigan QB because they are playing Rutgers, and the next week you want the Oklahoma State QB because they are playing Kansas.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 3:11 pm to East Coast Band
A. you never want a Michigan QB
B. Mayfield will be taken probably in the first round.
The player pool is limited for that very reason. It helps cut down on that and forces you to play your best players. Back in 2008 I ran a league that was all FBS and that's exactly what it was, I hated it and didn't play again til 2011. It was starting a RB from SJSU only because he was playing San Diego. That's not the case with a smaller player pool. There's a lot less in the FA player pool that you might think and you more often than not want to play your studs unless they're playing the Tide.
B. Mayfield will be taken probably in the first round.
The player pool is limited for that very reason. It helps cut down on that and forces you to play your best players. Back in 2008 I ran a league that was all FBS and that's exactly what it was, I hated it and didn't play again til 2011. It was starting a RB from SJSU only because he was playing San Diego. That's not the case with a smaller player pool. There's a lot less in the FA player pool that you might think and you more often than not want to play your studs unless they're playing the Tide.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 3:23 pm to kufta4
How does this site compare to fantrax.com? I've used that site for college football fantasy the last 3 years and even college basketball fantasy last season and they have a good format IMO
Posted on 6/4/17 at 3:31 pm to BowlJackson
Sorry for the confusion but we use Fantrax. cffleague.com is just where we house a lot of our information. All time records, owners list, official rules etc.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 3:32 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
College fantasy football is not nearly as good as NFL fantasy football.
I agree. Honestly I would love to find a simple game staight-up pick'em. Just to gauge my thought on who will win key games. No lines. Just who wins straight-up.
Posted on 6/4/17 at 4:13 pm to kufta4
Gotcha
How many spots do you have left? I'm on mobile so I might not be able to fill out your form for a couple hours but I'm always down to join another league
How many spots do you have left? I'm on mobile so I might not be able to fill out your form for a couple hours but I'm always down to join another league
Posted on 6/4/17 at 4:17 pm to BowlJackson
There's 9 spots in the 3rd satellite league left. I require a cell after the submission and whoever submitted earlier hasn't returned that info yet. You're not official until that point.
You can submit on mobile so here's the direct link. If you want to expedite the process, include your cell in the comments. It wont be posted anywhere and is only used for fantasy emergencies.
LINK
You can submit on mobile so here's the direct link. If you want to expedite the process, include your cell in the comments. It wont be posted anywhere and is only used for fantasy emergencies.
LINK
Posted on 6/4/17 at 5:53 pm to East Coast Band
I went back and looked just for the fun of it.
Michigan's QB scored 10 points vs Rutgers in last year's 78-0 win. 100 yards passing and 1 TD 0 INTs. A start like this most likely would have resulted in a loss that week.
Oklahoma State's QB score 14.8 points against Kansas. 220 yards passing and 1 TD with -12 rushing and a sack.
I wanted for comparison to show JT Barrett vs Oklahoma. Basically the opposite of the games listed as the ones you're targeting. Against Oklahoma Barrett scored 35 fantasy points. That's about the range an avg QB scores in this league. Less and you're disappointed. 40 or more and you can say your QB had a good game. My best performance last year was 61 points with Washington's QB vs Oregon where they just went off. Turned out to be the only week I won in what was a really awful year for me.
So it's not really that easy. In the limited player pool, sometimes the thinking is if I have Rudolph playing Kansas, and he throws 1 TD, the RBs score 2 and if there's a non offensive TD from either a kick or punter return or a pick or fumble, is Rudolph riding the pine at that point. Looks as though that may have been the case for both QBs in your example.
Michigan's QB scored 10 points vs Rutgers in last year's 78-0 win. 100 yards passing and 1 TD 0 INTs. A start like this most likely would have resulted in a loss that week.
Oklahoma State's QB score 14.8 points against Kansas. 220 yards passing and 1 TD with -12 rushing and a sack.
I wanted for comparison to show JT Barrett vs Oklahoma. Basically the opposite of the games listed as the ones you're targeting. Against Oklahoma Barrett scored 35 fantasy points. That's about the range an avg QB scores in this league. Less and you're disappointed. 40 or more and you can say your QB had a good game. My best performance last year was 61 points with Washington's QB vs Oregon where they just went off. Turned out to be the only week I won in what was a really awful year for me.
So it's not really that easy. In the limited player pool, sometimes the thinking is if I have Rudolph playing Kansas, and he throws 1 TD, the RBs score 2 and if there's a non offensive TD from either a kick or punter return or a pick or fumble, is Rudolph riding the pine at that point. Looks as though that may have been the case for both QBs in your example.
This post was edited on 6/4/17 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 6/4/17 at 6:24 pm to joshnorris14
Will we be wagering bitcoin?
Posted on 6/4/17 at 7:26 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Will we be wagering bitcoin?
We have a history of accepting bitcoin and paying out in bitcoin, so yes
Posted on 6/5/17 at 5:19 am to TheDeathValley
You can fill out the contact form at www.cffleague.com
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News