Started By
Message

re: Alabama OG Alphonse Taylor found not guilty of DUI and leaving the scene

Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:36 am to
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26953 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:36 am to
quote:

even if it was a trial, which is kind of unclear by the short article,


What is it about being found "not guilty" that was confusing to you? I mean, it was a pretty large font size.
This post was edited on 8/30/16 at 11:37 am
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64468 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:37 am to
quote:

What is it about being found "not guilty" that was confusing to you?

that sometimes reporters incorrectly use legal terminology. i can 100% guarantee i know infinitely more about the legal system than you do. the fact you think he should sue

here is an article that is better and clearer
LINK /
This post was edited on 8/30/16 at 11:38 am
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38235 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:37 am to
I wonder how many other people see a DWI case beat in 6 weeks?
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64468 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:39 am to
quote:

I wonder how many other people see a DWI case beat in 6 weeks?


generally isn't the case, but you can file a motion for a speedy trial. and in a small county it's much easier as well
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:40 am to
Was it because his car didn't have air conditioning and he had to drive around in the heat while everybody else has cars with AC?
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26953 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:41 am to
quote:

What is it about being found "not guilty" that was confusing to you?

that sometimes reporters incorrectly use legal terminology

here is an article that is better


Ahh, I see. So "Alphonse Taylor was acquitted" and "Judge Ricky McKinney ruled Taylor was not guilty..." was also confusing to you.

Now you're just face saving. You said the charges were dropped. They weren't. It's significant because the DA's office expended time and resources to try a case they didn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning.
This post was edited on 8/30/16 at 12:02 pm
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30190 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Seriously, someone should be fired, and if Taylor sues,
This is water under the bridge now, and Taylor should treat it as such.
Posted by jatebe
Queen of Links
Member since Oct 2008
18275 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 11:51 am to
quote:

From what I read about this. NOT AN EXPERT


quote:

Showed up to a hit and run. Found the suspect.
Alphonse called the cops @ 8:50 am and waited for them.

quote:

He passed the breathalyzer
Correct. He provided two breath samples at 9:19 a.m. The tests showed that he had a 0.0 blood alcohol content.

quote:

He failed.
Where did he fail?

quote:

He did not tell the cops he hit his head, the layer said that later.
Wrong..... "The officer wrote that Taylor was reclining in his 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe when he arrived. Taylor told the officer that he had bumped his head on the steering wheel. The 911 call taker who dispatched the officer to the accident reported that Taylor was very difficult to understand." LINK

quote:

Whether he called or not he still left the scene of an accident.
He was in the parking lot where the accident occurred when the officer arrived.

He was charged with leaving the scene of an accident after the officers found another car struck and determined he had hit it earlier in the morning. This one is confusing to me.

Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64468 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Ahh, I see. So "Alphonse Taylor was acquitted" and "Judge Ricky McKinney ruled Taylor was not guilty..." was also confusing to you
nothing is confusing me. i simply found another article that gave a clearer picture of what happened, information that was not included in the article in the OP
quote:

It's significant because the DA's office expended time and resources to try a case they didn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning.


except it's not significant. but you continue to try to be an internet lawyer and i'll just continue being a real one
This post was edited on 8/30/16 at 12:13 pm
Posted by CaptSpaulding
Member since Feb 2012
6501 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 12:17 pm to
Only explanation is that he was high on pot cigarettes, which is what they call a gateway drug, and he left the scene in search of harder drugs like acid.
Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
1946 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 1:07 pm to
He was acquitted as soon as the jury realized he was an Alabama football player.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27339 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Especially when you blow a 0.0 as in this case.


Even worse. He hit two cars in two different locations inside of the apartment according to the article. That means he's irresponsible and an incompetent driver.
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter