Started By
Message
Admit it, the SEC was better when Mizzou and Carolina were both good
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:15 pm
Ever since we both fell off, the East has been in shambles.
18
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:16 pm to MizzouTrue
Yes, we all long for that one season when Missouri and South Carolina were both kind of good.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:16 pm to MizzouTrue
At what?
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:17 pm to MizzouTrue
2013 was the only season where both Mizzou and USCe were good.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:17 pm to TT9
Making bad internet posts I guess.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:20 pm to MizzouTrue
Only once in the last 8 seasons has the SEC Title Game been decided by one score.
Hint: Neither Missouri or South Carolina were the east rep.
Hint: Neither Missouri or South Carolina were the east rep.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:21 pm to MizzouTrue
It would just make the conference more interesting if anyone from the East was good.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:21 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Only once in the last 8 seasons has the SEC Title Game been decided by one score.
Hint: Neither Missouri or South Carolina were the east rep.
/thread
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:21 pm to MizzouTrue
Mizzou and Carolina were good?
Posted on 12/13/16 at 2:24 pm to MizzouTrue
'member when...
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:16 pm to MizzouTrue
quote:
Ever since we both fell off, the East has been in shambles.
I would argue that Missouri and Carolina "being good" was more of a reflection of the shambles than the cause of it
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:18 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
It would just make the conference more interesting if anyone from the West besides Alabama was good.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:19 pm to MizzouTrue
quote:
Ever since we both fell off, the East has been in shambles.
That is more of a reflection of how bad the SEC was this past season than anything. Mizzou and SC had legit teams. Mizzou in 2013 and SC had a couple of really good years. Other than that.....
Posted on 12/13/16 at 3:57 pm to MizzouTrue
quote:
Admit it, the SEC was better when Mizzou and Carolina weren't members.
FIFY
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:03 pm to MizzouTrue
SCar is trending up...SJWU on the other hand... 
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:22 pm to BamaELCo
I don't blame you for not knowing, but Mizzou is going to surprise next year.
Probably not a 2013 surprise, but much better than most anticipate.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:28 pm to MizzouTrue
@Mizzou attempting to be relevant in any way possible.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:38 pm to MizzouTrue
quote:
Hint: Neither Missouri or South Carolina were the east rep.
Hint#2: The East representative didn't have to travel very far to get to the game.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 4:39 pm to MizzouTrue
In shambles? UK looking good to me. What you should worry about is Mizzou suck arse basketball program. The reason why we let you asses into the conference to begin with.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 6:09 pm to MizzouTrue
What an incredibly stupid statement.
The Sec is better when teams don't suck,,hence this applies TO ANY TEAM in the conference. Stop being so needy Mizzzlou.
The Sec is better when teams don't suck,,hence this applies TO ANY TEAM in the conference. Stop being so needy Mizzzlou.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News