Started By
Message
1st time since 2005 SEC won't be represented in Heisman Finalists
Posted on 12/5/16 at 11:49 pm
Posted on 12/5/16 at 11:49 pm
Wonder how much that and Lamar Jackson having pretty much won it already will impact the TV ratings.
8
Posted on 12/5/16 at 11:54 pm to BamaELCo
He's literally the Myles Garrett of QBs. Pads stats against god awful teams and folds when he plays real competition, save for Clemson.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 11:59 pm to BamaELCo
I'm honestly not so sure Jackson wins it with how he finished the season losing the final two games and throwing 3 picks against Kentucky. I know Jackson has the stats, but it wouldn't shock me to see Watson win
Posted on 12/6/16 at 12:02 am to BamaELCo
Were the TV ratings ever that great anyways?
In fact its such a shitty cast of characters (highlighted by Peppers who is a joke) that more people watch just to see the train wreck
In fact its such a shitty cast of characters (highlighted by Peppers who is a joke) that more people watch just to see the train wreck
Posted on 12/6/16 at 12:07 am to FourThreeForty
quote:
He's literally the Myles Garrett of QBs. Pads stats against god awful teams and folds when he plays real competition, save for Clemson.
vs Florida State:
216 yards passing, 1 passing TD
147 yards rushing, 4 rushing TDs
vs Clemson:
295 yards passing, 1 passing TD
162 yards rushing, 2 rushing TDs
vs Kentucky (bowl eligible):
211 yards passing, 2 passing TDs
171 yards rushing, 2 rushing TDs
vs NC State (bowl eligible):
355 yards passing, 3 passing TDs
76 yards rushing, 1 rushing TD
vs Boston College (bowl eligible):
231 yards passing, 4 passing TDs
185 yards rushing, 3 rushing TDs
vs Wake Forest (bowl eligible):
145 yards passing, 1 passing TD
153 yards rushing
Seems like he was pretty damn good against the good/solid teams on their schedule...
...but don't let stats stop you from spewing your SEC biased nonsense
This post was edited on 12/6/16 at 12:09 am
Posted on 12/6/16 at 12:10 am to FourThreeForty
quote:
Pads stats against god awful teams and folds when he plays real competition, save for Clemson.
Dude had one bad game vs Houston. Not his fault his defense was garbage vs Kentucky.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 3:01 am to lsufball19
Great player. Turnover prone sometimes tho. Amazingly elusive runner. He should win it.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 3:54 am to BamaELCo
This really is a lousy year for the Heisman. When the clear cut front-runner is a player from a 3 loss Louisville team. With all due respect to Lamar.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 7:16 am to BamaELCo
Lamar won the Heisman against Charlotte in the first game.
Fact.
Fact.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 7:22 am to FourThreeForty
No, Lamar Jackson is fricking good. Heisman.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 7:42 am to harmonics
quote:No, it's better when they give the best player in college football the award. Not the best player on the best team. It shouldn't matter if his team has no losses or 12 losses.
This really is a lousy year for the Heisman. When the clear cut front-runner is a player from a 3 loss Louisville team.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 7:55 am to BamaELCo
Yeah because if Alabama doesn't have a rep in NY for the Heisman, who could possibly care? It's Jackson, Watson and Baker Mayfield? Jackson or bust.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:01 am to FourThreeForty
quote:
save for Clemson.
...and FSU.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:04 am to TTsTowel
quote:
No, it's better when they give the best player in college football the award. Not the best player on the best team. It shouldn't matter if his team has no losses or 12 losses.
Totally agree. That's been a flawed approach that goes back years and years, particularly in the era of Notre Dame dominance.
It must be based on a ridiculous logical fallacy that the best player on the best team must be the best player in college football.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:24 am to Crimson Legend
I mean... Manziel and RGIII won it and they certainly weren't on the best teams 
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:56 am to Crimson Legend
quote:
That's been a flawed approach that goes back years and years, particularly in the era of Notre Dame dominance.
Eh that's not always the case. Seems like that's the case moreso when there hasn't been a clear cut favorite. Plenty of guys have won it without being on one of or the best teams
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:57 am to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
1st time since 2005 SEC won't be represented in Heisman Finalists by WilliamTaylor21quote:He's literally the Myles Garrett of QBs. Pads stats against god awful teams and folds when he plays real competition, save for Clemson. vs Florida State: 216 yards passing, 1 passing TD 147 yards rushing, 4 rushing TDs vs Clemson: 295 yards passing, 1 passing TD 162 yards rushing, 2 rushing TDs vs Kentucky (bowl eligible): 211 yards passing, 2 passing TDs 171 yards rushing, 2 rushing TDs vs NC State (bowl eligible): 355 yards passing, 3 passing TDs 76 yards rushing, 1 rushing TD vs Boston College (bowl eligible): 231 yards passing, 4 passing TDs 185 yards rushing, 3 rushing TDs vs Wake Forest (bowl eligible): 145 yards passing, 1 passing TD 153 yards rushing Seems like he was pretty damn good against the good/solid teams on their schedule... ...but don't let stats stop you from spewing your SEC biased nonsense
^^^That's gonna leave a mark.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:59 am to harmonics
quote:
This really is a lousy year for the Heisman. When the clear cut front-runner is a player from a 3 loss Louisville team. With all due respect to Lamar
Not at all, see 2007 when Tim Tebow won the Heisman on a 3-loss Florida team, and McFadden came in second on a 4-loss Arkansas team.
Nothing lousy about either of those teams.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 9:07 am to BamaELCo
quote:
Wonder how much that and Lamar Jackson having pretty much won it already will impact the TV ratings.
So salty.
Watson wins it.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 9:12 am to BamaELCo
Who gives a shite about a media popularity contest?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News