Started By
Message

re: Ole Miss amends stadium expansion costs....

Posted on 4/17/15 at 3:01 pm to
Posted by Rebel Land Shark
Member since Jul 2013
30162 posts
Posted on 4/17/15 at 3:01 pm to
If we were to build a upper deck like Bjork said we could do I imagine it would make a cluster frick right in there but I doubt anything will ever be as bad as Vandy's football/basketball/baseball stadium all in one spot.

Also I imagine it would depend on the size if we built an upperdeck more the size of Michigan State's or Rutgers it wouldn't be too bad





But if we built something like the size of Auburn it would cause more of a problem





Posted by SwayzeBalla
Member since Dec 2011
19451 posts
Posted on 4/17/15 at 3:03 pm to
I think it would be something like Rutgers (smaller). As long as the structure overlapped the lower deck and went upward instead of toward the Pavilion, I think it would be fine.
Posted by Sancho Panza
La Habaña, Cuba
Member since Sep 2014
8161 posts
Posted on 4/17/15 at 5:00 pm to
Should be nice. Help keep noise in, too.

Congratulations!!!
Posted by StarkRebel
Member since Sep 2014
2175 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 9:47 am to
quote:

2014, Presbyterian - 99%


Complete bullshite
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 11:19 am to
quote:

I'm not sure how they'd do it unless they tore down the press box and added an upper deck with the press box built into the upper deck, kind of like this old picture of Bryant-Denny Stadium:

That is what we will do.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 11:35 am to
quote:

With not building the final few rows of the North endzone it leaves room to be able to match the top part of the south endzone after it's renovated this year assuming they decided to tear down those 2 buildings that are under the North endzone

What I think will be the second project after the current NEZ expansion. I doubt we will have the ticket demand to handle two upper decks in the near future and do not see us tearing down the East side to just put suites and club seating up. The reason being that we would have to tear down what we built as soon as the deman for a second upper deck is there.

My dream would be to have a structure above the west side that stretches from end zone to end zone and connects to the video boards in the SW and NW corners. Having a structure above the bowl that would stretch from NE corner to SE corner around the west side. That would leave the only gap between our upper bowl structures on either side of the East side rebel club starting at the 20 and going to each end zone in the north and south. Our new video board in the north will need to be replaced regardless of plans by 2025. When we mirror the NEZ with the SEZ, we will have four video boards in the all the corners.

Think how well that stadium would hold in noise.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 11:40 am to
quote:

B) I don't really know how many more spectators evening out the rows in the south endzone would add?

Not as many as you would think if the NEZ mirrors the SEZ exactly. The first seven rows of the SEZ have been removed for suites so if that is done in the NEZ, not many rows will be added. I'd say with all the club seating, suites, and all the rows added, we would net 2500-3k added attendance
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 11:43 am to
It wouldn't surprise me if we did all chair back upper deck. We could build that as big as Auburns and it only add 6k seats. Well actually that would surprise me because that's what I would actually like to happen. You are correct though, we will not build a 9k+ seat upper deck
Posted by Less Cowbell
Powder Springs, GA
Member since Nov 2014
624 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 1:41 pm to
When did Bjork say anything about adding an upper deck?
This post was edited on 4/20/15 at 1:42 pm
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 2:13 pm to
Many many times in various interviews. It's the next move. We will tear down the press box and add a super structure with suites, press, club seating and an upper deck
This post was edited on 4/20/15 at 2:14 pm
Posted by Less Cowbell
Powder Springs, GA
Member since Nov 2014
624 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 2:19 pm to
That sounds great! Totally for it. About time, really.

But haven't there been problems or weird legality issues with stadium size limits in the state of Mississippi? I seem to recall something on those grounds in the past.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64463 posts
Posted on 4/20/15 at 2:23 pm to
quote:


But haven't there been problems or weird legality issues with stadium size limits in the state of Mississippi? I seem to recall something on those grounds in the past.




All expansion projects have to be approved by the IHL.
Posted by lockthevaught
Member since Jan 2013
2357 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:11 pm to
99% vs Presbyterian is impressive
Posted by SwayzeCrazy
Member since Jan 2015
3260 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:13 pm to
quote:


All expansion projects have to be approved by the IHL.


Well we're fricked. The IHL doesn't want us to get too far ahead of the other schools in state.

Maybe they'll feel bad for the Jones disaster and just let us do what we want.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64463 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:29 pm to
quote:


Well we're fricked. The IHL doesn't want us to get too far ahead of the other schools in state.



The positive is that I don't recall them ever vetoing a proposed expansion by us. I'm sure all they do is just make sure we have the proper planning and fundraising so that we don't go bankrupt with borrowing an ungodly amount of money that we can't pay back.
Posted by YouDontKnowBro
Los Angeles
Member since Apr 2014
1864 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

All expansion projects have to be approved by the IHL.


That's pretty standard for public works projects. Technically the true owners of the project are the citizens of MS because we are a public institution and IHL is acting on the behalf of the citizens.

TL:DR It's a formality required by law. I needed to use my RECM knowledge.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64463 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 11:09 pm to
Well, yeah.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26496 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:16 am to
Anyone got any renderings of an upper deck on VHS? Any photoshop wizards care to give it a crack?
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 4/27/15 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

@rebelsportsbiz: Since FY12 @OleMissSports annual operations budget has grown from $57.5M to a projected FY16 budget of $92.9M. #RebBiz
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18064 posts
Posted on 4/27/15 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

@rebelsportsbiz: Since FY12 @OleMissSports annual operations budget has grown from $57.5M to a projected FY16 budget of $92.9M. #RebBiz


And look... most of our sports teams have been successful.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter