re: OT: Troops to "operate undetected amongst civilian population."

quote:

---

I can't think of a logical reason to decide to implode the building due to the damage and not want this known....

---

Because then they'd have to admit that 7 was pre-wired for demolition well in advance.....

Both towers #1 and #2 clearly collapsed from the top or at the points where the planes hit them. We all clearly saw them begin their dissents from the tops down. They did not implode from the bottom up.

So answer this, if they were allegedly pre-wired with explosives to collapse on purpose, how the ever living frick did those explosives not ignite and blow up the instant the planes crashed in to them and giant jet-fuel fireballs shot out over the city?

Are you really trying to say those buildings were wired with explosives in the small amount of time while raging fires were burning? Or are you trying to tell me they were pre-wired but those explosives stayed intact and didn't blow up when the jets crashed in to them?

I mean there is no way the towers were pre-wired and they weren't wired to blow from top-down in the hour they were burning. And if they weren't wired to blow, then why would #7 have been?

I mean it's just total bullshite to claim the towers collapsing was a planned/designed/organized demolition, but that all the wires and explosives survived jet fuel burning and planes crashing through them.

quote:

---

It just doesn't make sense to me.

---

You keep jumping ahead to motive.....and letting that cloud what can be seen clearly and what you know in your gut makes perfect sense for Building 7.

Does the grim reality that Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition spark a whole lot of frightening questions? Of course, it does.

But, that doesn't change the facts or the evidence at the crime scene. It doesn't change what you can see clearly with your own eyes. And it doesn't change the fact that official revised explanation of how Building 7 came down is simply impossible. THat it can be disproven in a few seconds by a high school Physics teacher.

Forget about motive for now, man. And THEN tell me what you see?

Beef dawg, have you watched video of Building 7?

Or are you just trying to noodle your way through this in your head without looking at evidence?

How does tower #1 and #2 not have anything to do with #7????

If you can't explain the two towers away with your retarded conspiracy theories, then how do you expect anyone to believe #7 was part of one?

And Jefferson, eat a dick. Thanks.

If you take motive and context out of the discussion, I can still accept the official collapse story. The sprinkler systems were probably overwhelmed and based on photographic evidence the bottom several floors of 7 were completely on fire. Also, it was built over a subway station that allowed airflow. The North Tower across the street collapsed and caused God knows what damage to the underground superstructure. The collapse was at 5 which is about 8 hours or so after WTC 1 & 2 were attacked so it was on fire for a while. I can buy that it gave way due to these stresses....even being the first steel structure ever to do so.

What I can't make fit however is the news reports and air traffic talking about blowing the building and reported sounds of explosions. If you go down that rabbit hole...you have to accept it was blow on purpose ....which means it was prewired to blow before 9/11....which means the whole thing was set up. Also...if this is all true I would submit that WT 7 was the main target of the attack and 1 & 2 were diversions...because again what purpose does blowing WT 7 serve?

But let's be clear...I have no doubt that there are elements within the military industrial complex that would justify such an act for their profit and perceived "greater good". It would have just been one hell of a complicated operation to pull off. I'm open to any links or YouTube videos with info that I may not be aware and need to see. Also...I'm well aware of all of the other shady goings on and have no doubt there is a lot we're not being told.

Maybe we should sic JAG on them (old school for you rig)...

Well, in that case, i guess if a highrise building needs to be demolished in the future, then they shouldn't waste their time and money anymore with all the engineering and preparations...Instead, simply light some random office fires......and wait for the building to collapse neatly at free-fall speed straight down into its own footprint. Problem solved!

Squatch, WTC 7 wasn't the only building located at the foot of the twin towers. Many buildings suffered worse damage and also burned..........but none of them disintegrated into their own footprint. Why? Because it's impossible.

I love how you just refuse to acknowledge my point. Maybe because you can't and it blows your retarded conspiracy out of the water.

Come on Jefferson, please explain to us all how wires and explosives needed for a MASSIVE controlled demolition survive raging fires for hours.

Also feel free to check these:
LINK
Video