Started By
Message

re: Doesn't LSU owe A&M anyway?

Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:14 pm to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44016 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Actually its the other way. We need this lawsuit to get nasty so we have a rivalry for rivalry weekend that doesn't require us winning anything.


Posted by UserName69
Member since Sep 2014
1613 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

A&M had Chavis sign a contract stating that A&M would pay buyout fees, therefore A&M owes LSU $400k.


So if they "settle" and Chavis or A&M pays LSU $100,000, according to A&M fans, they would still owe LSU $300,000..even after they settled..

Am I doing this right?
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 3:17 pm
Posted by Herman Frisco
Bon Secour
Member since Sep 2008
17246 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:20 pm to
The way I see it LSU owes A&M $400,000. They did LSU a favor and helped them get rid of a coach who is famous for 3rd and long. Lsu wanted him gone so pay up, it's the right thing to do...
Posted by Tubedog13
Member since May 2009
3495 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:20 pm to
Don't blame LSU for your administration settling for 100K. Those lazy fricks should've flown their arse to Louisiana if they wanted the other 400K.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43785 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

The way I see it LSU owes A&M $400,000.


Except LSU doesn't. Try to keep up.
Posted by BasilBogomil
Member since Dec 2012
6091 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

That's true. We settled.


Game over.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:24 pm to
You laugh but there is some truth in that.

If we had beaten LSU during our SEC run, and Bama not at all, then maybe it is Kirby Smart on our sidelines next year.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44016 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

So if they "settle" and Chavis or A&M pays LSU $100,000, according to A&M fans, they would still owe LSU $300,000..even after they settled.. Am I doing this right?

Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36104 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:26 pm to
1) if they did then it would have gone to court and A&M would have collected.
2) A&M owes LSU for supporting their entry into the SEC and behaving like a welcoming institution. Signing on for a rivalry game to replace Texas is the second obvious demonstration of this (the first being A&M's entry)
3) A&M can't have it both ways on Chavis. When he was recruiting for them in January that's either a violation (since he's not their employee) or an early departure (so they should pay the 400k).

IDC which of the options they choose from #3 but it has to be one of the two.
Posted by agswin
The Republic of Texas
Member since Aug 2011
4337 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Why didn't A&M pursue it?


To us $400,000 is chump change. I guess to LSU, it's the state budget.

Since they decided to go after, we will play too.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44016 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

The way I see it LSU owes A&M $400,000. They did LSU a favor and helped them get rid of a coach who is famous for 3rd and long. Lsu wanted him gone so pay up, it's the right thing to do...

Nah, we'll take the upgrade AND the 400 large.

It's just business.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41813 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:28 pm to
quote:


To us $400,000 is chump change. I guess to LSU, it's the state budget.


You can't "buy" a win against poor LSU
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43785 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

To us $400,000 is chump change


aTm is willing to go to court over it. So, apparently it isn't "Chump Change', now is it?
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

IDC which of the options they choose from #3 but it has to be one of the two.



The NCAA doesn't have the same standard as a court. A court can rule that Chavis owes nothing AND the NCAA can do jack crap.

The NCAA doesn't have the power of subpoena. If this case doesn't put things into public record that prove the violation (yes more than a few pictures and secondhand recruit's claims) then they can't do anything.

Something tells me if LSU unearths some smoking gun we will settle the next day. The only way we would go down this path is if we feel we are most likely in the right.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

You can't "buy" a win against poor LSU



Don't speak so soon. Unless you believe that dominance of LSU over A&M is so solid it cannot be jinxed.

Heck just the odds say we were going to beat you eventually. Given how much yall teed up the ball I think if God has a sense of humor it will be this season.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 3:31 pm
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70878 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:32 pm to
I mean this is clearly going to settle IMO. I don't think aTm or Chavis have anything to gain by letting it go to court, as it seems to me that LSU has enough on Chavis that we probably don't know about.
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24312 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

I guess to LSU, it's the state budget.



Such a swing and a miss of a joke.


Where's A&M btw????






College Football Program Values
Ranking School Value
1 Texas $131 million
2 Notre Dame $122 million
3 Michigan $117 million
4 Alabama $107 million
5 LSU $103 million
6 Auburn $97 million
7 Tennessee $94 million
8 Oklahoma $93 million
9 Ohio State $87 million
10 Georgia $83 million
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

I mean this is clearly going to settle IMO.


I think if it was going to it would have. I would also think if the LSU AD had some Chavis dirt that would be out in the open via a back channel by now.

Honestly I think A&M/Chavis wins this case. And that isn't Aggie delusion talking, just the way the situation has set up.
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:35 pm to
Chaggies owe LSU $400K PLUS other damages. Isn't that what the law suit states?
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24312 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Honestly I think A&M/Chavis wins this case. And that isn't Aggie delusion talking, just the way the situation has set up.


Based on what?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter