Started By
Message
re: Kevin Steele is a downgrade
Posted on 3/2/15 at 2:51 pm to mattytiger123
Posted on 3/2/15 at 2:51 pm to mattytiger123
Kevin Steele is a fricking joke.
0
Posted on 3/2/15 at 2:52 pm to WRTC
Speaking of what you don't know/where you've never been. You're definitely an Aggy.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:02 pm to NFLSU
Can y'all agree that Chavis is going to improve that aTm defense?
Can y'all agree that with LSU's talent they will never field a horrible defense regardless of who they have coaching the D?
The real question is which team will field the better offense?
Can y'all agree that with LSU's talent they will never field a horrible defense regardless of who they have coaching the D?
The real question is which team will field the better offense?
This post was edited on 3/2/15 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:04 pm to RT1941
This about them healing, not agreeing
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:05 pm to NFLSU
Lashing out in anger? Is that not a step in the grieving process?
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:07 pm to NFLSU
quote:
He recruited for A&M for over a month and nothing came of it.
Without him we don't get Mack. Period.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:10 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Without him we don't get Mack. Period.
Mack said he really wanted to play for Chavis at LSU....but he's just a 5* defensive player, not significant
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:11 pm to Pavoloco83
quote:
I dont think he's the strategist and game planner that Chief is.
He may not be the in-game coach that Chavis is, but with Orgeron and Raymond supporting him, I think we'll be alright.
He's a much better recruitor than Chavis, and I expect our LB play to improve.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:11 pm to RT1941
quote:
Can y'all agree that Chavis is going to improve that aTm defense?
It all depends. Chavis' D needs depth and above average CB play. What about A&M makes anyone think they will have either?
quote:
Can y'all agree that with LSU's talent they will never field a horrible defense regardless of who they have coaching the D?
This seems to be very hard to understand for some here.
quote:
The real question is which team will field the better offense?
Statistically or one that wins games? A&M will put up a ton of yardage and points but their pace will have that D on the field a ton.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:12 pm to cardboardboxer
So you're saying you would have lost the #2 defensive player in the State to ANOTHER Big12 team had Chavis not been hired? Seems pretty indicative of your program and the reality of its shortcomings.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:16 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
Mack said he really wanted to play for Chavis at LSU....but he's just a 5* defensive player, not significant
Mickey Johnson 2.0
ETA:
2014 LSU sack totals
2014 Texas A&M sack totals
Myles Garrett's talent will be wasted
This post was edited on 3/2/15 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:18 pm to RT1941
It should improve.
But Chief doesn't work miracles. Which is what aggy needs to compete for the west.
But Chief doesn't work miracles. Which is what aggy needs to compete for the west.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:23 pm to NFLSU
quote:
So you're saying you would have lost the #2 defensive player in the State to ANOTHER Big12 team had Chavis not been hired? Seems pretty indicative of your program and the reality of its shortcomings.
So in a WRTS thread you go on and on about how the hashtag is ridiculous because we are at best fourth in the state after at least TCU and Baylor because of their performance last year.
Yet in this thread potentially losing Mack to the same TCU is "indicative of your program and the reality of its shortcomings."
Which is it? TCU is better than us and therefore should recruit better than us, or we are the better program and therefore we get to use WRTS with impunity?
Unless your Big 12 dig was referring to Texas, which is an even MORE ridiculous claim for you to make considering how your favorite talking point is how they were our daddy before LSU.
I don't mind playing Rant with you NFLSU, but it is no fun when you keep moving the goalposts. The only consistency in your narrative is your hatred of Aggie.
Without Chavis we don't get Mack, that is the truth. Spin the result however you want, or say it is a fluke, but for this recruiting cycle Chavis pulled his weight.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:23 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
Considering the lack of talent on your D, you might want to rethink your position.
Meh. Our defensive line is more talented than LSU's. Linebackers and the secondary aren't, but when Chavis establishes himself after a couple seasons they most likely will be. A&M will have a far more talented defense than LSU in 2-3 years.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:24 pm to TeLeFaWx
Aggy predictions :jump1: :jump2:
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:25 pm to cas4t
I'm just glad Chavis is gone. I hope for A&M's sake he improves their defense, but God Damn I was getting sick of our defense getting worse and worse every year and becoming very predictable. I don't know what Steele is going to bring, but right now I feel a lot better about starting the season with a fresh face at DC that looks to have a good bit of potential.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:26 pm to cas4t
You know that's not true. We've been on the bubble of competing for the west with a HORRIBLE defense. We need an average to ok defense to contend.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:29 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Meh. Our defensive line is more talented than LSU's. Linebackers and the secondary aren't, but when Chavis establishes himself after a couple seasons they most likely will be. A&M will have a far more talented defense than LSU in 2-3 years.
I know you're a caricature, but I actually laughed out loud when I read this. Good job.
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:37 pm to cardboardboxer
Cardboard, when you only land 1 of the top 8 defensive players in the State while pumping out the SEC logo as much as you do..there's a problem with your program.
Page 7 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News