Started By
Message
Who will be more improved in 2015: LSUs offense or A&M's defense?
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:19 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:19 am
Obviously both were last in their respected categories last year, this is not meant to be a flame thread.
Both fanbases have reasons to be optimistic with young A&Ms D getting a year of experience and adding Chavis to help improve. While LSU was very young at offensive skill positions, and hopefully another year of the system will help the QB situation. Who do yall think will be more improved next year?
Both fanbases have reasons to be optimistic with young A&Ms D getting a year of experience and adding Chavis to help improve. While LSU was very young at offensive skill positions, and hopefully another year of the system will help the QB situation. Who do yall think will be more improved next year?
23
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:19 am to RagingCajun3195
A&M's defense and it isn't even worth debating
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:21 am to RagingCajun3195
LSU hasn't had an offense in at least half a decade why would I think next year would be different.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:22 am to RagingCajun3195
quote:LSU has a system?
hopefully another year of the system
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:23 am to Iosh
tamu has the easiest route to improvement ...
they just need to learn the concept of "defense" to start ...
they just need to learn the concept of "defense" to start ...
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:28 am to RagingCajun3195
LSU has the players. A&M doesn't
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:29 am to TheJones
quote:
A&M's defense and it isn't even worth debating
This. We actually shook up our defensive coaching staff to cause change.
Meanwhile to fix up the offense LSU.....shook up the defensive coaching staff!
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:30 am to GermantownTiger
quote:
LSU has the players. A&M doesn't
Yall have a QB?
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 11:57 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:32 am to RagingCajun3195
how about......neither! 
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:32 am to GalvoAg
quote:
Yall have a QB?
This is the answer and it isn't even close...
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:34 am to Iosh
Yea...an only Miles understands it !
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:34 am to RagingCajun3195
I think LSU's offense because i am bias and an optimist.
The truth I think LSU has a much her ceiling. IF we reach our potential we will be infinitely better than A&M has a chance of being on defense.
However i think A&M is more likely to have guaranteed improvement.
That being said, they lack a lot of the things Chavis needs to succeed.
No MLB (this ruins is essential to his system)
NO man cover corners
Weak DL (outside Miles Garrett who will thrive in Chavis's system)
They will be better, but will be limited by personal.
The truth I think LSU has a much her ceiling. IF we reach our potential we will be infinitely better than A&M has a chance of being on defense.
However i think A&M is more likely to have guaranteed improvement.
That being said, they lack a lot of the things Chavis needs to succeed.
No MLB (this ruins is essential to his system)
NO man cover corners
Weak DL (outside Miles Garrett who will thrive in Chavis's system)
They will be better, but will be limited by personal.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:35 am to SammyTiger
A&M Defense will be much better.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:36 am to oklahogjr
quote:
LSU hasn't had an offense in at least half a decade
i remember 2013 like it was 2 years ago
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:38 am to oklahogjr
quote:
LSU hasn't had an offense in at least half a decade why would I think next year would be different.
You MAD
Mett - 3,000+ passing
OBJ- 1000+ Receiving
Landry - 1000+ receiving
Hill - 1000+ rushing
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 11:40 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:42 am to Restomod
That was good enough for 6th in the SEC on offense.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:43 am to RagingCajun3195
It really depends on what you mean by improve.
aTm D:
Scoring - 126th
Rushing - 111th
Passing - 83rd
Total D - 104th
3rd down D - 67th
Turnovers - 122nd
LSU offense:
Scoring - 76th
Rushing - 25th
Passing - 116th
Total - 80th
3rd down - 71st
Turnovers - 27th
So you see, it would be really hard for aTm to not improve on those terrible numbers. Going from 110+ to 80 is a huge improvement for them, yet they would still be pretty bad. Meanwhile, going from 80+ to 50 or so is much harder to do.
So, to answer the question, odds are aTm will improve them most.
aTm D:
Scoring - 126th
Rushing - 111th
Passing - 83rd
Total D - 104th
3rd down D - 67th
Turnovers - 122nd
LSU offense:
Scoring - 76th
Rushing - 25th
Passing - 116th
Total - 80th
3rd down - 71st
Turnovers - 27th
So you see, it would be really hard for aTm to not improve on those terrible numbers. Going from 110+ to 80 is a huge improvement for them, yet they would still be pretty bad. Meanwhile, going from 80+ to 50 or so is much harder to do.
So, to answer the question, odds are aTm will improve them most.
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 11:47 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:43 am to RagingCajun3195
Duh?
Posted on 1/30/15 at 11:44 am to GalvoAg
quote:7th actually in ypg.
That was good enough for 6th in the SEC on offense.
Drops down to 8th if you just include BCS AQ teams.
Page 1 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News