Started By
Message
Alternate history: what would you have chosen/supported
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:19 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:19 am
In 1846-47, the United States was at war with Mexico. We initially took what is now the American Southwest, and tried to sue for peace. The Mexican government refused to sign any peace agreement that involved the cession of more land the the USA, so the decision was made to invade central mexico.
Around this time, there was a minority opinion to annex Baja California, Sonora, and Chihuahua as well.
There was another movement call the "All of Mexico" movement, that was dropped because of Northern fear of Mexico being divided into too many slave states, and Southern fear of too many Latinos.
Both of these were abandoned. If you had been able to make the decision at the time, would you have gone with the historic outcome of just Alta California? Or tried for more?
Around this time, there was a minority opinion to annex Baja California, Sonora, and Chihuahua as well.
There was another movement call the "All of Mexico" movement, that was dropped because of Northern fear of Mexico being divided into too many slave states, and Southern fear of too many Latinos.
Both of these were abandoned. If you had been able to make the decision at the time, would you have gone with the historic outcome of just Alta California? Or tried for more?
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:23 am to cokebottleag
Baja, while cool to visit, is pretty much a wasteland. Chihuahua isn't much better.
All of Mexico couldn't have been swung; we would have been occupiers and never accepted.
Now, all of the resources of Mexico would be awesome. It's a real travishamockery that a country so rich in potential and gifted with such resources continually shits the bed. I
All of Mexico couldn't have been swung; we would have been occupiers and never accepted.
Now, all of the resources of Mexico would be awesome. It's a real travishamockery that a country so rich in potential and gifted with such resources continually shits the bed. I
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:27 am to cokebottleag
I would have chosen to take all of Mexico, because it would be easy to build a huge wall with a fiery moat across the skinny southern part.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:34 am to cokebottleag
I would have chosen "All of Mexico" because it would have prevented the current loss of "All of America" to the invaders from the south.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 3:45 pm to cokebottleag
Take the northern half of Mexico. Allow popular sovereignty to dictate slave issue as per the contemporary Kansas-Nebraska Act.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 4:00 pm to cokebottleag
As the only Expert of Mexico on this board, I'd definitely have voted to take it all. There are way more resources than people actually know, especially in the agricultural area. The tourism would have been amazing, cartels a non-factor and a much smaller border to make defensible for land crossing.
Womenfolk ain't bad either.
Womenfolk ain't bad either.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 4:09 pm to cokebottleag
If Tennessee wanted "all of Mexico", we would have had "ALL OF MEXICO". Fact.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 4:22 pm to Vols&Shaft83
United States of All of America
Posted on 1/30/15 at 4:57 pm to cokebottleag
Would have taken all of Baja and Sonora y Chihuaha.
Baja would be incredible beachfront property for retirement communities if it had been under white people control for the past 150 years. Plus Gulf of California, fishing, etc.
Baja would be incredible beachfront property for retirement communities if it had been under white people control for the past 150 years. Plus Gulf of California, fishing, etc.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 5:16 pm to cokebottleag
I would've McArthur'd it and stopped at the Isthmus of Panama. Good place to set up a narrow border crossing that could have easily been controlled.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 5:32 pm to cokebottleag
With Obama at the helm we are working on getting "all of Mexico" anyways
Posted on 1/30/15 at 6:23 pm to cokebottleag
All of it. Just think of all the things that would be different.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:59 pm to cokebottleag
I would not change a thing.
Now, the prospect of invading Mexico TODAY and taking everything to, and including, The Panama Canal, has been the subject of some of my hypnagogic musings.
Now, the prospect of invading Mexico TODAY and taking everything to, and including, The Panama Canal, has been the subject of some of my hypnagogic musings.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 8:12 pm to Jobu93
quote:
Baja, while cool to visit, is pretty much a wasteland. Chihuahua isn't much better.
In my opinion, we and Israel should invade the Baja again, and then we have the Jews move there. The Jews like deserts and hate Muslims, and the only difference between the Sea of Galilee and the Sea of Cortez is world class sports fishing. We will wait until around 11:30 at night when all of Mexico passes out, and then take it over by the time they wake up. Once they've got the land secure, they can then send the Mexicans back over to Israel, scrape off the top 8 inches of soil, spread it over the Penusula, and then start afresh.
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 1/30/15 at 8:16 pm to OMLandshark
Do you think God would bless Mexico? Even he's embarrassed
Posted on 1/30/15 at 8:18 pm to DMagic
quote:
Do you think God would bless Mexico? Even he's embarrassed
That's why I added sending Mexicans back to Israel to scrap off all the surface dirt. God's already blessed that soil, so just bring the soil over here.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 10:39 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
If Tennessee wanted "all of Mexico", we would have had "ALL OF MEXICO". Fact.
V,B
Posted on 1/31/15 at 2:11 am to CroakaBait
quote:
I would've McArthur'd it and stopped at the Isthmus of Panama. Good place to set up a narrow border crossing that could have easily been controlled.
boom
Just think, all these people would be speaking English today as well.
Posted on 1/31/15 at 3:25 am to DawgSmoke
Quesadilla level invasion but not enchilada level invasion
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News