Started By
Message
re: Sumlin - what's your threshold Aggies?
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:09 pm to Spindicus Lofrus
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:09 pm to Spindicus Lofrus
How many years of 7 or less wins before Charlie is gone?
0
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:09 pm to JimmyHDeridderhigh
quote:
Lsu should be an easy win for yall.
It's hard to set the hook when you don't even bother baiting it right.
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:10 pm to derSturm37
quote:
If we can get some D out of Chief then things might get real good real fast.
Chavis is aggy now, he will definitely give us some D.
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:12 pm to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
Why can't he keep top Texas recruits from going to Big12 programs in the State?
This post was edited on 1/28/15 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:15 pm to Dr RC
quote:
s this just a shitty troll job
No it's actually not. It's a comment on your incredibly shitty logic. Your assertion that aTm was "close" because IF they had beaten right UF or LSU they would have won the West is absurd. It's assuming everything else stays exactly the same, which, in itself, is absurd.
quote:
I'm saying we were actually pretty damn close to getting one which is a straight up fact.
And once again, it's not a fact, it's your opinion. You give your opinion that aTm was 8 points away and it's a fact, but when I give my opinion that LSU was 1:30 away and my "tiny peen" is showing? Nice logic once again there.
The only fact in this argument is neither won the West and aTm finished 3rd in the division.
This post was edited on 1/28/15 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:16 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
He's won 1 fewer game than Miles over his three years in Aggieland, and he's done it with far less talent, and he's done it while recruiting at an elite level and building up the talent level of the program, and he just stole Chavis from LSU.
Recruiting at such an elite level and building up a program that LSU keeps trotting out freshman and continues to whip the Aggies.
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:17 pm to Projectpat
quote:
Anyways, as much as everyone around here likes to ignore it, A&M finishing top 5 in the country after it's first year in the SEC, a year in which the overwhelming majority was that we'd be fighting for last place in the division, gave him a lot of slack. We knew this year was going to be a rebuilding type year (no Manziel, very young on defense), so 8-5 was expected.
But is it how you got to 8-5. Started with a bang and ended in a bust. Blown through one QB (is he leaving?). Second QB is good but is he JFF good? Don't see that yet. I think the Aggies digressed on defense, but that should (maybe, at least help) reverse with Chavis.
I know y'all have tons of cash, but Sumlim is pretty highly paid along with his staff. I am sure someone might bark at that later (ie. This team is paying under $3 million for our 10-2 season and we are paying over $5 million ofr 8-4?).
I think Sumlin has plenty of time as long as the Aggies have the cash to spend. Another season like last and I can hear the alumni rumbling, especially if Baylor and TCU keep flying high and U of Texas (figgin bastards) start trending up. A season worse and it might get ugly. Of course, winning solves a lot.
The state of Texas can be a huge pissing contest with each other behind the sence. Green-eyed boosters can run amonk and screw it all up.
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:26 pm to RB10
quote:
No it's actually not. It's a comment on your incredibly shitty logic. Your assertion that aTm was "close" because IF they had beaten right UF or LSU they would have won the West is absurd. It's assuming everything else stays exactly the same, which, in itself, is absurd.
If we had beaten LSU, you could have changed the wins or losses for ANY SEC team and A&M would have still won the west. We would have been 7-1 in the SEC and held the tie-breaker against every other SEC west team no matter what.
Stop being a douche. It's okay to admit A&M had a good team once in the last 100 years.
ETA: if you can look back on a season and change a 1 score game (that the team led at half no less) from a loss to a win and that result in an SEC west title, that is absolutely "sniffing an SEC west title" by any reasonable person.
This post was edited on 1/28/15 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:35 pm to NFLSU
Futures Bleak we are discussing gay sex here, please hold your questions until we are finished. 
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:36 pm to RB10
quote:
And once again, it's not a fact, it's your opinion. You give your opinion that aTm was 8 points away and it's a fact, but when I give my opinion that LSU was 1:30 away and my "tiny peen" is showing? Nice logic once again there.
yes its you tiny peen showing b/c you had to try to one up w/a "well we were eve closer than you so nya nya nya!"
keep on keepin on brah
so sorry we make u
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:37 pm to MMB5DAP
quote:
Stop being a douche. It's okay to admit A&M had a good team once in the last 100 years
I never said aTm wasn't good in 2012.
quote:
If we had beaten LSU, you could have changed the wins or losses for ANY SEC team and A&M would have still won the west. We would have been 7-1 in the SEC and held the tie-breaker against every other SEC west team no matter what
Once again, you're assuming aTm would still beat Bama, whom you played after LSU.
I've already said, assuming everything thing else stays equal, in this situation, is absurd. aTm had both losses by week 8. Had you won either of those games, the possibility is high that the rest if the season would have played out much differently.
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:38 pm to Dr RC
quote:
yes its you tiny peen showing b/c you had to try to one up w/a "well we were eve closer than you so nya nya nya
Nah, just pointing out your ridiculous logic. Which I see you can't refute so you digress to what essentially becomes "you mad". Just go ahead and post a gif next time.
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:43 pm to derSturm37
quote:
3) Damn but ain't there A LOT of LSU people jumping on this thread, already?
Maybe it had something to do with "ya'll beat LSU easily" comment
I hope he stays honestly for obvious reasons.
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:45 pm to RB10
That's fine that you don't like to do hypotheticals where only one thing changes. Most reasonable sports fans are able to do that. The fact remains that A&M was absolutely "sniffing" an SEC west title in 2012 whether you like it or not
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:47 pm to RB10
Dude, its ok that you were wrong. You can admit it. But go ahead and pretend that you're the great brain and we all a bunch of dumb Aggy if it makes ya feel better.
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:49 pm to MMB5DAP
quote:
The fact remains that A&M was absolutely "sniffing" an SEC west title in 2012 whether you like it or not
You're fighting a losing battle, hyperbole is a Cajun specialty. Win by 1? "We whooped yer arse!" Lose by 1? "Fire everyone! Bench everyone!"
This post was edited on 1/28/15 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:51 pm to MMB5DAP
At any rate this topic is absurd. A&M has been shitty for the past 15+ years and mediocre at best before that. Sumlins worst season at A&M so far is on par with the best seasons in the last 15 years.
You dumbasses keep talking out of both sides of your mouth:
"A&M isn't even a has been!!! They're a never was! They always suck!"
"So A&M fans when are you gonna fire sumlin for only winning 9 games a year???"
You dumbasses keep talking out of both sides of your mouth:
"A&M isn't even a has been!!! They're a never was! They always suck!"
"So A&M fans when are you gonna fire sumlin for only winning 9 games a year???"
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:51 pm to MMB5DAP
quote:
That's fine that you don't like to do hypotheticals where only one thing changes. Most reasonable sports fans are able to do that.
I can apply that logic when it makes sense. For example, UGA would have played in the BCSNC had they beat Bama in 2012 or LSU would have played in the Sugar Bowl in 2010 if they'd beaten Arkansas.
However, when it's faulty, at best, to use this type of logic, I don't do it.
quote:
The fact remains that A&M was absolutely "sniffing" an SEC west title in 2012 whether you like it or not
Do the two of you need me to provide the definition of fact? Saying aTm was close is not a fact, it's an opinion.
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:52 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Dude, its ok that you were wrong. You can admit it. But go ahead and pretend that you're the great brain and we all a bunch of dumb Aggy if it makes ya feel better.
I'm not the one giving my opinion and calling it fact, so....
Posted on 1/28/15 at 12:55 pm to RB10
Dude I'm sorry but you are being silly.
7-1 won the division. A&M was 6-2 w/a head to head win over 7-1 Bama.
If you think that isn't close... well then... sorry but you dumb.
This post was edited on 1/28/15 at 12:58 pm
Page 4 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News