Started By
Message
re: Better college football program since 1992. Bama or Florida?
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:16 pm to Crimson Legend
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:16 pm to Crimson Legend
frick off crowd pleaser.
0
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:17 pm to OffroadSportsman89
ITT: very insecure gumps
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:17 pm to SwayzeCrazy
No one gives a shite about baseball. The fact that regular season games basically don't appear on TV should clue you in to that.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:19 pm to Chronic
quote:
No one gives a shite about baseball. The fact that regular season games basically don't appear on TV should clue you in to that.
Ole Miss suddenly decided it's a major sport since they were pretty good last year.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:19 pm to Crimson Legend
Wins mean more or national titles mean more?
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:20 pm to Crimson Legend
Actually we've been pretty good in it.
Bama fans seem to think that football is the only sport.
Bama fans seem to think that football is the only sport.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:20 pm to OffroadSportsman89
Alabama.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:22 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Winning percentages since 1982 and national rank:
Florida 73.4 (6)
Auburn 70.0 (9)
Bama 67.7 (15)
LSU 66.3 (19)
Florida 73.4 (6)
Auburn 70.0 (9)
Bama 67.7 (15)
LSU 66.3 (19)
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:22 pm to OffroadSportsman89
quote:
Wins mean more or national titles mean more?
Depends on the situation. I don't consider Michigan's wins to make them superior over Bama because they played more seasons, played different teams, and won FAR FAR fewer championships.
But Alabama and Florida played the same number of games against many of the same opponents, with only one national title difference, and the nod goes to Florida in SEC championships. Championships are relevant, but you don't just count them up and ignore the other factors.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:24 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Better college football program since 1992. Bama or Florida?
quote:
Winning percentages since 1982
quote:
Florida 73.4 (6)
Auburn 70.0 (9)
This one has a little trouble staying on topic.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:24 pm to OffroadSportsman89
quote:
Wins mean more or national titles mean more?
You gonna try and argue BYU has been a better football program than Georgia since 1982 next? They have more national titles and less wins which seems to fit your simple minded criteria.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 8:25 pm
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:24 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Yo tiger in Miami, is much better all time program than auburn so frick off
Bama has many more national titles, wins, sec titles, head to head wins, all Americans, better coaches, etc.
Bo Jackson and payt Sullivan also were also embarrassed by bama in their senior seasons
Bama has many more national titles, wins, sec titles, head to head wins, all Americans, better coaches, etc.
Bo Jackson and payt Sullivan also were also embarrassed by bama in their senior seasons
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:25 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
You gonna try and argue BYU has been a better football program than Georgia since 1982 next? They have more national titles and less wins which seems to fit your simple minded criteria.
Is BYU in the SEC?
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:26 pm to Crimson Legend
I posted since 1992 already.
Now STFU.
Now STFU.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:26 pm to OffroadSportsman89
Better program since 1982 alabama or auburn
Bama: 4 national titles
6 sec titles
Auburn: 1 national title
7 sec titles
Better head to head vs alabama
4>1 brah
Bama: 4 national titles
6 sec titles
Auburn: 1 national title
7 sec titles
Better head to head vs alabama
4>1 brah
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:27 pm to OffroadSportsman89
Yo tiger in Miami... Auburn ain't shite
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:28 pm to OffroadSportsman89
AU has 4 national titles since 1983 using bama math lil fella.
And more wins.
And more SEC championships.
And more SEC wins.
And more head to head wins.
And has played a tougher schedule (by far).
And has more H2H wins in AU.
And has more H2H wins in Tuscaloosa.
Etc, etc.
And more wins.
And more SEC championships.
And more SEC wins.
And more head to head wins.
And has played a tougher schedule (by far).
And has more H2H wins in AU.
And has more H2H wins in Tuscaloosa.
Etc, etc.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:29 pm to OffroadSportsman89
are we counting those vacated victories due to the Langham situation and other b.s.? If so, those really need to be added back and both programs are basically even....and the extra title would give Bama the nod.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:29 pm to Korin
Are you a dumbass?
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:31 pm to OffroadSportsman89
Bama has two 4 win seasons and a 3 win season in that span.
UF has had one 4 win season. Other than that they haven't won less than 7 games in a season.
Bama has been better recently, but has had lower lows. UF has been really consistent.
This is bias free, as I hate them both.
UF has had one 4 win season. Other than that they haven't won less than 7 games in a season.
Bama has been better recently, but has had lower lows. UF has been really consistent.
This is bias free, as I hate them both.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News