Started By
Message
re: Bama player lays a hit on Bulldogs
Posted on 12/19/14 at 12:44 pm to RB10
Posted on 12/19/14 at 12:44 pm to RB10
quote:
To anyone with reading comprehension above a 3rd grade level
Duhhh....to anyone with an IQ above that of a turnip, the word "approximately" is open to interpretation of the person making the decision.
1
Posted on 12/19/14 at 12:45 pm to BamaGradinTn
This is a great Offseason thread, guys. 
Posted on 12/19/14 at 12:48 pm to RB10
quote:
RB10
Bama player lays a hit on Bulldogs
quote:
always thought that there is no kick catch interference for non fair catches on kick offs
They changed it a couple of years ago to protect the receiving team on onside kicks.
The only exception...as noted in the rule I quoted...is for an onsides kick that is pounded immediately into the ground and bounces up.
"f. During a free kick a player of the receiving team in position to receive the
ball has the same kick-catch and fair-catch protection whether the ball is
kicked directly off the tee or is immediately driven to the ground, strikes the
ground once and goes into the air in the manner of the ball kicked directly
off the tee."
Posted on 12/19/14 at 12:49 pm to Buttermilk Pancakes
This^^^^.Not sure but it looks like a Landon Collins hit.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 12:53 pm to WillHarsha
quote:
I cant believe you have made me defend fricking bammer too.
Your sacrifice will not go unnoticed
Posted on 12/19/14 at 12:54 pm to Buttermilk Pancakes
Frick you.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 12:55 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
immediately driven to the ground, strikes the ground once and goes into the air in the manner of the ball kicked directly off the tee."
Why do you keep highlighting this? The ball never touched the ground before Jones hit him. It wasn't an onside kick, it was a pooch kick.
This post was edited on 12/19/14 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 12/19/14 at 12:58 pm to WillHarsha
quote:
I cant believe you have made me defend fricking bammer too.
You seem to be a straight shooter, you're alright in my book
Posted on 12/19/14 at 1:23 pm to RB10
quote:
It wasn't an onside kick, it was a pooch kick.
No foul called = legal play, end of story. You can continue to debate it all day long, but it will never change that play.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 1:24 pm to Spread
quote:
You can continue to debate it all day long, but it will never change that play
Well no fricking shite. Thanks for explaining that one for me.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 1:26 pm to RB10
quote:
Thanks for explaining that one for me.
You're welcome... you seem to be having a problem with letting it go, so I thought I'd help you out.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 1:29 pm to Buttermilk Pancakes
yeah, i remember that one. good hit. also 
at the all the butthurt in this thread about it
at the all the butthurt in this thread about itPosted on 12/19/14 at 1:30 pm to Spread
quote:
No foul called = legal play, end of story
BTW this is probably the dumbest thing you've ever said, and that's impressive. Just because a facemask isn't called doesn't make it a legal play.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 1:57 pm to RB10
quote:you seem pretty emotionally invested in a play that happened over a year ago with a different team
BTW this is probably the dumbest thing you've ever said, and that's impressive. Just because a facemask isn't called doesn't make it a legal play
Posted on 12/19/14 at 2:16 pm to narddogg81
quote:
you seem pretty emotionally invested in a play that happened over a year ago with a different team
You got me. I'm not passing time at work by posting on a message board. No, that can't possibly be it.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 2:28 pm to RB10
quote:
Just because a facemask isn't called doesn't make it a legal play.
Let me make this simple for you; when you go back and watch that game, was a foul called? If yes, then it was not legal. If no foul called, it was legal. That is not my opinion, that is historical proof, right there on video for you and all the world to see. It doesn't matter what your opinion is, or what you THINK happened, or what you THINK should have happened.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 2:31 pm to Spread
quote:
If no foul called, it was legal
So when I go back and watch a game where a face mask was missed, it was legal just that time? That makes sense.
Said no one. Ever.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 2:38 pm to RB10
quote:
So when I go back and watch a game where a face mask was missed, it was legal just that time? That makes sense
Does the missed call show up in the penalty stats? No. Calls are missed every game, that is a given. But seeing a missed call after a game is over does not - and will never - change how that play was called during the game. I realize we are arguing semantics here, but I too am killing time at work - plus the Jones hit in the video was legal.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 2:40 pm to narddogg81
quote:
you seem pretty emotionally invested in a play that happened over a year ago with a different team
He's only arguing because Alabama is involved.
Posted on 12/19/14 at 2:43 pm to Buttermilk Pancakes
Awesome hit! Boom mutherfricka!
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News