Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Ohio State is given a pass for losing to a hapless Va Tech

Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:14 am
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:14 am
Why isn't Missouri afforded the same luxury for their early season loss to Indiana? Is it because Virginia Tech is more of a name brand?
Posted by thefloydian
Member since Dec 2012
4771 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:15 am to
Va Tech is shite, but Indiana is next-level shite.
Posted by Volmanac
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2009
7733 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:15 am to
We don't have a signature win but that will change Saturday.
Posted by NeverToYield
Ever to conquer!
Member since May 2014
616 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Why isn't Missouri afforded the same luxury for their early season loss to Indiana?


OSU has also beaten michigan state and minnesota. Who is missouri's best win honestly? aTm? Arkansas?

Against the best team they faced they lost at home by 5 touchdowns.
Posted by Sancho Panza
La Habaña, Cuba
Member since Sep 2014
8161 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:32 am to
They don't have 2 losses, yet.
Posted by CrimsonCrusade
Member since Jan 2014
5142 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:34 am to
Mizzou also got crushed at home by UGA.
Posted by ATLdawg25
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:36 am to
VT loss combined with a 34-0 shutout at home. If OSU had the second loss, they would be about where Missouri is in the rankings.

Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Mizzou also got crushed at home by UGA.


We played without 2 starting WR's and our QB had a fricked up shoulder, our offense then and now is not comparable.
Posted by ATLdawg25
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:40 am to
quote:

We played without 2 starting WR's and our QB had a fricked up shoulder, our offense then and now is not comparable.


Ok, so we will use that as a comp for OSU's loss when Barrett was playing his 2nd career game. Now add on the Indiana loss.
Posted by Aman
Alabama
Member since Mar 2010
5181 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Is it because Virginia Tech is more of a name brand?


That plus it was their first game with the new QB after the starter went down. He got markedly better after that.
Posted by JCinBAMA
North of Huntsville
Member since Oct 2009
17582 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:42 am to
quote:

We played without 2 starting WR's and our QB had a fricked up shoulder, our offense then and now is not comparable


Nice try
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:43 am to
omg look at that, is that.....INDIANA'S STARTING QB?

Man....it's like Indiana played a backup QB for the rest of the season....

Also Coleman is a 2000 yard rusher, something Bama doesn't have, not scared.
Posted by JCinBAMA
North of Huntsville
Member since Oct 2009
17582 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 8:45 am to
quote:

omg look at that, is that.....INDIANA'S STARTING QB?


And that's y'all starting D you need to be scared.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter