Started By
Message
Is LSU's running back corp the most physical rb corp in cfb?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:11 am
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:11 am
You have LF at 6'1 and 230 lbs, Kenny Hilliard at 6ft and 235 lbs, Terrance Magee at 5'9 220 lbs.,and Darrel Williams at 6'1 and 225 lbs.
I havent seen a rb corp this year that matches their physicality.
I havent seen a rb corp this year that matches their physicality.
6
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:12 am to JaxTiger10
Nah.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:13 am to northalabamacracker
Then who?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:14 am to JaxTiger10
This post was edited on 11/28/14 at 12:15 am
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:15 am to JaxTiger10
Don't ask that idiot for a legit response. He has an IQ of 73.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:16 am to 870Hog
What's funny? I'm not calling them them the best, just the most physical.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:18 am to JaxTiger10
Since you included injured Kenny Hilliard, I will say with certainty that Gurley, Chubb, Douglas, Marshall, Michel was the most physical RB group in the country. Size alone doesn't make a back physical. Maybe your 4th stringer is more physical than theirs, but they have two guys that if healthy would be the starter at LSU, and run with more physicality than anyone at Lsu.
Could make a case for Arkansas backfield as well, hell even South Carolina.
Could make a case for Arkansas backfield as well, hell even South Carolina.
This post was edited on 11/28/14 at 12:20 am
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:19 am to Riseupfromtherubble
I agree with you, but are you implying Hilliard isn't a physical back? It's literally his only attribute.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:19 am to JaxTiger10
Not even in yhe SEC.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:20 am to northalabamacracker
Then who? Every one of lsu's rbs have great power.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:20 am to cas4t
No, I was just reminding ricky that Hilliard is done for the year or else he would have said "yea but Gurley is hurt"
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:21 am to Riseupfromtherubble
Makes more sense then 
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:24 am to Riseupfromtherubble
Ah shite. It is that idiot, genetically inferior douche bag rickdaddy.
What a fricking loser that guy was.
What a fricking loser that guy was.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:25 am to northalabamacracker
I started a thread for you fellas
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:30 am to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
Size alone doesn't make a back physica
I never said it did , but all lsu rbs ARE physical and if if you have two different rbs and they run with the same physicality, the rb that weighs more will have more power behind his pads.
quote:
Since you included injured Kenny Hilliard, I will say with certainty that Gurley, Chubb, Douglas, Marshall, Michel was the most physical RB group in the country
Fair point.
quote:
Could make a case for Arkansas backfield as well, hell even South Carolina.
No. After williams and collins, arky's rbs take a big drop off. There is also a big drop off for USC after davis and wilds.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:39 am to JaxTiger10
Not every team rotates 4 backs (overkill iyam). If a team uses two, then that's basically their RB corps. South Carolina and Arkansas fall into that category, with A third guy sprinkled in.
2 backs are capable of carrying the load and running with physicality throughout a game.
Lsu has a physical backfield. It's just a matter of opinion whether or not it "the most physical"
A RB corps isn't apples to apples as I pointed out. If one team only uses two physical runners, does it really matter if lsu has a more physical 4th stringer than them if they're only using 2 guys?
2 backs are capable of carrying the load and running with physicality throughout a game.
Lsu has a physical backfield. It's just a matter of opinion whether or not it "the most physical"
A RB corps isn't apples to apples as I pointed out. If one team only uses two physical runners, does it really matter if lsu has a more physical 4th stringer than them if they're only using 2 guys?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:43 am to Riseupfromtherubble
Of course not. But this is just another version of the popular LSU moral victory thread to comfort them after such a mediocre season.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:45 am to Riseupfromtherubble
I mean our 3rd string RB is 6'2, 250 if we're just talking size. 
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:49 am to Riseupfromtherubble
Bad thread, even worse troll attempt if it is that.
If you had said physical rushing style, maybe, but showing their pure size and body builds is simply that size and athleticism.
We beat a bad football team, that is very thin at many positions. We looked terrific because A&M is really bad on offense right now, and when you run the HUNH, and you get 3 and outs, coupled with a smaller, thinner (numbers wise) defensive front seven, and our between the tackles running style, it was a good matchup.
Early on in the game if A&M could have just not started so poorly on offense, they would have won this game. Not taking credit away from our D because they have really stepped up, but a lot of drops, and a lot of breaks went LSU's way tonight, bottom line, that's football.
If you had said physical rushing style, maybe, but showing their pure size and body builds is simply that size and athleticism.
We beat a bad football team, that is very thin at many positions. We looked terrific because A&M is really bad on offense right now, and when you run the HUNH, and you get 3 and outs, coupled with a smaller, thinner (numbers wise) defensive front seven, and our between the tackles running style, it was a good matchup.
Early on in the game if A&M could have just not started so poorly on offense, they would have won this game. Not taking credit away from our D because they have really stepped up, but a lot of drops, and a lot of breaks went LSU's way tonight, bottom line, that's football.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:08 am to Riseupfromtherubble
Hillary tweeted that he'll be ready for the bowl game
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News