Started By
Message
The Iron Bowl winner will have had the more successful season
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:23 pm
Yes?
9
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:25 pm to JuiceTerry
9-3 > 10-2? Maybe, dunno.
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:25 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Yes?
I say no
Winning the iron bowl will not save our season. Alabama winning it will save theirs.
Our season is already a disappointment. Winning another iron bowl wont change that
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:26 pm to JuiceTerry
Not if MSU loses to Ole Miss and Alabama goes to the SECCG even with an Iron Bowl loss. Then it would be Alabama because they are playing for a championship.
If MSU wins the Egg Bowl, then your statement is probably true even if Alabama has a better overall record. In that scenario, neither season would be considered a success. It would just be a mediocre season ending on a high note by beating your rival. Beating your rival is always nice.
If MSU wins the Egg Bowl, then your statement is probably true even if Alabama has a better overall record. In that scenario, neither season would be considered a success. It would just be a mediocre season ending on a high note by beating your rival. Beating your rival is always nice.
This post was edited on 11/24/14 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:29 pm to elposter
You may be right, El. If State wins, though, I would say Auburn has had a more successful season, assuming they win. Better wins, the Iron Bowl would tip it.
This post was edited on 11/24/14 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:33 pm to JuiceTerry
If Bama wins then yes 111-1 is an excellent season
If Aubie wins, which I hope they do, I still think Bama was more successful, and all you have to do to figure that out is to look at who each team lost to.
If Aubie wins, which I hope they do, I still think Bama was more successful, and all you have to do to figure that out is to look at who each team lost to.
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:34 pm to JuiceTerry
Correct me if I'm wrong, but UA can still win the West with loss.
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:35 pm to JuiceTerry
Bama, yes.
AU, no.
AU, no.
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:40 pm to JuiceTerry
Not really. I mean, if AU wins it is close. Both have decent records considering the respective schedules and both would have big signature wins.
But Alabama wins and has a ton to still play for.
I will say that if AU wins and UA is 10-2 and AU is 9-3, the records probably pretty accurately reflect reality. If UA gets through at a 11-1, I think they're viable in the playoff, but this is probably one of the more vulnerable teams to come out of the SECW in recent years.
But Alabama wins and has a ton to still play for.
I will say that if AU wins and UA is 10-2 and AU is 9-3, the records probably pretty accurately reflect reality. If UA gets through at a 11-1, I think they're viable in the playoff, but this is probably one of the more vulnerable teams to come out of the SECW in recent years.
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:42 pm to JuiceTerry
If neither teams wins a championship, the winner would have had a better season. Doesn't matter if the loser has a slightly better record
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:42 pm to Pettifogger
State champs >>>> no SEC west, No SEC, No Nattie. However if Alabama wins all there goals are intact. Would be a championship season.
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:44 pm to JuiceTerry
Auburn would have the more successful season if it caused Bama to miss the SEC Championship. That's the only way.
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:51 pm to diddydirtyAubie
I don't see Ole Miss beating State, so that would probably be the case.
Posted on 11/24/14 at 5:52 pm to JuiceTerry
Our season was over after losing to ATM.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News